School of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Ashworth Research Centre, Mersey Care NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Aggress Behav. 2024 Jun;50(4):e22165. doi: 10.1002/ab.22165.
The current study examines the effects of trait aggressiveness, inhibitory control and emotional states on aggressive behavior in a laboratory paradigm. One hundred and fifty-one adult participants took part (73 men, 71 women, and 7 nondisclosed). Event Related Potentials (ERPs) during a Go/No-Go task were utilized to capture the extent of inhibitory processing, with a laboratory provocation paradigm used to assess aggression. Contrary to the expectations, negative affective responses to provocation were negatively associated only with short-lived aggression and only among those with high past aggressiveness. Furthermore, past aggressiveness was related to a continuous increase in laboratory aggressive behavior regardless of the level of inhibitory control (P3 difference amplitude). However, feeling hostile was associated with short-lived aggressive behavior, only in those with lower levels of inhibitory control. These findings demonstrate the effect of distinct mechanisms on different patterns of aggressive behavior.
本研究采用实验室范式,考察了特质攻击性、抑制控制和情绪状态对攻击行为的影响。共有 151 名成年参与者(73 名男性,71 名女性,7 名未公开性别)参加了研究。通过 Go/No-Go 任务中的事件相关电位(ERP)来捕捉抑制加工的程度,并用实验室挑衅范式来评估攻击性。与预期相反,对挑衅的消极情感反应仅与短暂的攻击性呈负相关,且仅在过去攻击性高的人群中存在。此外,过去的攻击性与实验室攻击性行为的持续增加有关,而与抑制控制水平无关(P3 差异幅度)。然而,敌意感与抑制控制水平较低的人短暂的攻击性行为有关。这些发现表明,不同的机制对不同模式的攻击行为有影响。