Departmental Faculty, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Sep 3;79(9):2354-2363. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae236.
To clarify whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be useful for resistance assessment in virologically suppressed highly treatment-experienced (HTE) individuals with MDR HIV.
Ninety-one participants from the PRESTIGIO Registry were included. NGS was performed on HIV-DNA at 1%, 5% and 20% cut-offs; major drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were evaluated and compared with those detected in historical plasma genotypic resistance testing (h-GRT). APOBEC editing was also characterized.
Participants had a complex and long treatment history [median 23 (IQR 21-25) years of ART exposure) and had been virologically suppressed since a median of 3 (IQR 2-5) years. Among all major DRMs detected by HIV-DNA NGS and/or h-GRT, 30% were exclusively found through NGS. The highest detection rate of historical major DRMs was reached with NGS set at 1%, but unusual substitutions and extensive APOBEC hypermutations suggest technical issues and poor clinical relevance in the 1%-5% interval. At NGS set at 5%, 67.2% of historical major DRMs were detected. The number of major DRMs detected exclusively by DNA-NGS as minority variants (frequency 5%-20%) was significantly higher in individuals who later experienced virological rebound compared with those who maintained virological control [median 2 (IQR 1-3) versus 1 (0-2), P = 0.030] and positively correlated with viraemia levels at rebound (rho = 0.474, P = 0.030).
In non-viraemic people with an MDR virus, HIV-1 DNA NGS set at 5% is an acceptable technical cut-off that might help to reveal mutations with a potential clinical relevance. Moreover, the number of minority resistance mutations additionally detected by NGS might be associated with loss of virological control.
为了阐明下一代测序(NGS)是否可用于评估经治耐药(MDR)HIV 高度治疗经验(HTE)患者病毒学抑制下的耐药情况。
纳入 PRESTIGIO 登记处的 91 名参与者。在 1%、5%和 20%的截止值下对 HIV-DNA 进行 NGS;评估并比较主要耐药突变(DRMs)与历史血浆基因型耐药检测(h-GRT)中检测到的耐药突变。还对 APOBEC 编辑进行了特征描述。
参与者的治疗史复杂且漫长[中位数为 23(IQR 21-25)年的 ART 暴露),自中位数 3(IQR 2-5)年前以来一直病毒学抑制。通过 HIV-DNA NGS 和/或 h-GRT 检测到的所有主要 DRMs 中,有 30%仅通过 NGS 检测到。在 NGS 设置为 1%时,历史主要 DRMs 的检测率最高,但不寻常的替换和广泛的 APOBEC 超突变提示在 1%-5%的间隔内存在技术问题和较差的临床相关性。在 NGS 设置为 5%时,67.2%的历史主要 DRMs 被检测到。在后来发生病毒学反弹的个体中,仅通过 DNA-NGS 作为少数变异(频率 5%-20%)检测到的主要 DRMs 数量明显高于那些维持病毒学控制的个体[中位数 2(IQR 1-3)与 1(0-2),P = 0.030],并且与反弹时的病毒血症水平呈正相关(rho = 0.474,P = 0.030)。
在携带 MDR 病毒的非病毒血症人群中,HIV-1 DNA NGS 设置为 5%是一种可接受的技术截止值,可能有助于发现具有潜在临床相关性的突变。此外,通过 NGS 额外检测到的少数耐药突变数量可能与病毒学控制的丧失有关。