Ji Xubin, Li Tianyan, Liu Fang, Zhao Yanmin, Li Liang, Guo Guangming, Dong Minya, Gao Xuede
Trauma Orthopedics Department, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying 257091, Shandong, China.
Health Materials Management Department, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying 257091, Shandong, China.
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Jun 15;14(6):2971-2983. doi: 10.62347/SFEY4389. eCollection 2024.
This study investigated subtrochanteric femoral metastases using a retrospective approach by analyzing data from 109 patients with bone metastases (2015-2019). Surgical methods were compared: curettage with intramedullary nail and bone cement versus prosthetic reconstruction. Post-surgical assessments included joint function, bone metastasis-related serum markers, and complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent risk factors affecting patients' prognosis. R language was used to construct a nomogram model for predicting patients' 1- and 2-year survival, which was validated through ROC curves and the calibration chart. Patients treated with curettage showed superior postoperative outcomes, exhibiting significantly higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores (80.00 70.00, P < 0.001) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (MSTS) (23.86 ± 2.57 21.67 ± 3.24, P < 0.001). Both methods demonstrated comparable efficacy in pain control (VAS: 3.00 3.00, P > 0.05) and bone metabolism impact (ALP: 85.93 ± 14.44 83.19 ± 21.19; CTX-I: 3.03 ± 1.56 3.15 ± 1.75; PINP: 10.30 ± 4.41 11.57 ± 3.90; all P > 0.05). Cox regression identified treatment regimen, age, diabetes, and pre-treatment KPS score as significant survival factors (all P < 0.05). The nomogram model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting one-year and two-year survival (AUC: 0.821 and 0.790, respectively). In conclusion, curettage with intramedullary nail and bone cement enhances postoperative functional recovery and quality of life for subtrochanteric femoral metastases patients, representing a promising treatment method.
本研究采用回顾性方法,通过分析109例骨转移患者(2015 - 2019年)的数据,对股骨转子下转移瘤进行了调查。比较了手术方法:髓内钉和骨水泥刮除术与假体重建术。术后评估包括关节功能、骨转移相关血清标志物和并发症。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析筛选影响患者预后的独立危险因素。使用R语言构建预测患者1年和2年生存率的列线图模型,并通过ROC曲线和校准图进行验证。接受刮除术治疗的患者术后结果更佳,其卡氏功能状态(KPS)评分显著更高(80.00对70.00,P < 0.001),肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分(MSTS)也更高(23.86±2.57对21.67±3.24,P < 0.001)。两种方法在疼痛控制(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]:3.00对3.00,P > 0.05)和对骨代谢的影响方面(碱性磷酸酶[ALP]:85.93±14.44对83.19±21.19;I型胶原交联羧基末端肽[CTX-I]:3.03±1.56对3.15±1.75;I型前胶原氨基端前肽[PINP]:10.30±4.41对11.57±3.90;所有P > 0.05)疗效相当。Cox回归分析确定治疗方案、年龄、糖尿病和治疗前KPS评分是显著的生存因素(所有P < 0.05)。列线图模型在预测1年和2年生存率方面显示出较高的准确性(AUC分别为0.821和0.790)。总之,髓内钉和骨水泥刮除术可提高股骨转子下转移瘤患者术后的功能恢复和生活质量,是一种有前景的治疗方法。