Suppr超能文献

低负荷和高负荷热身方案对多组深蹲总负荷的影响。

Effect of warm-up protocols using lower and higher loads on multiple-set back squat volume-load.

机构信息

Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.

Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Jul 9;12:e17347. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17347. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after three warm-up protocols on back squat performance in trained men.

METHODS

Fourteen resistance-trained men performed conditioning activity (CA) with high-load (HL-CA), low-load (LL-CA), or usual specific warm-up as a control (CON). HL-CA consisted of one set of three repetitions with 90% of one repetition maximum (RM); LL-CA consisted of one set of six repetitions with 45% of 1 RM performed at maximal velocity; CON involved eight repetitions with 45% of 1 RM at controlled velocity. The participant's performance was measured using the total number of repetitions and volume load (reps × load × sets).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between warm-up for the total number of repetitions ( = 0.17) or total volume load ( = 0.15). There was no difference between conditions for the number of repetitions (main condition effect; = 0.17); however, participants achieved a significantly higher volume load after HL-PAPE than after CON for the first set ( = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

High or low equated-load CA used as warm-up strategies did not potentiate subsequent performance enhancement in multiple-set back squat exercise performed until muscle failure in comparison with usual warm-up.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨三种热身方案后的后激活性能增强(PAPE)对有训练的男性深蹲表现的影响。

方法

14 名有抗阻训练经验的男性进行了条件活动(CA),包括高负荷(HL-CA)、低负荷(LL-CA)或通常的特定热身作为对照(CON)。HL-CA 由一组三个重复,使用 90%的一次重复最大重量(RM)组成;LL-CA 由一组六个重复,使用 45%的 1 RM 以最大速度进行;CON 涉及 8 次重复,使用 45%的 1 RM 以受控速度进行。参与者的表现通过总重复次数和总负荷量(重复次数×负荷×组数)来衡量。

结果

在总重复次数( = 0.17)或总负荷量( = 0.15)方面,热身之间没有显著差异。在重复次数方面,条件之间没有差异(主要条件效应; = 0.17);然而,与 CON 相比,HL-PAPE 后,参与者在第一组中实现了显著更高的负荷量( = 0.04)。

结论

与通常的热身相比,高负荷或低负荷的等负荷 CA 作为热身策略,在多组深蹲练习中,直到肌肉疲劳,并没有增强随后的性能增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f829/11243969/62cd5ed2047d/peerj-12-17347-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验