Haq Ibrahim I, Manku Bhagat, Mahon Andrew, Langley Clare, Samson Deepak
Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 14;16(6):e62399. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62399. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Introduction Animal or human hand bites are a common presentation to the emergency department. If hand bites are not treated adequately, they can give rise to significant local and systemic complications, potentially leading to functional deficits that impact patients' lives. Traditionally, hand bites require hospital admission for the administration of intravenous antibiotics and, in some cases, surgical intervention. A combination of the increasing incidence, hospital admission rates, and in-patient bed pressures prompted a change in our bite management protocol and a move toward ambulatory management of bite injuries. We found this new protocol to be safe, efficient, and cost-effective with a scope for wider implementation. Aim The primary outcome is to assess the feasibility of safely managing hand bites on an outpatient basis, by reviewing the local data before and after the change in practice. The secondary outcome is to compare the financial implications of treating hand bites with an outpatient approach. Material and methods All first-presentation adult consultations referred to Trauma and Orthopaedics from the emergency department over a three-month snapshot period were reviewed in 2017. This was repeated after the implementation of the updated handbite guidelines in 2023. Initial admission documentation as well as operation notes and clinic follow-up letters were each reviewed retrospectively. Results In 2017, 36 patients were identified over three months. The average time to surgery was 1.19 days with an average inpatient stay of 2.36 days. There were two re-operations and follow-up of two cases of osteomyelitis. In 2023, 63 patients were identified over three months. The average time to surgery was 1.03 days with an average inpatient stay of 0.56 days. Thirty-seven surgeries were performed for 33 patients with 32% (20/63) of patients admitted directly from the emergency department. There were no documented cases of osteomyelitis on follow-up. The cost per patient episode decreased by 40% from 2017 to 2023, without accounting for inflation. Conclusions With the implementation of the new departmental guidelines, there has been a reduced average inpatient stay and reduced time to surgery without an increase in documented osteomyelitis. There is also a significant decrease in the average patient cost. This data suggests that without compromising patient safety it is possible to cost-effectively manage hand bites without the need for long inpatient stays. However, it is imperative that there is close patient follow-up as well as prompt time to surgery to ensure patient safety. Our findings suggest a need for further research to strengthen the evidence supporting our conclusions.
引言
动物或人类咬伤手部是急诊科常见的就诊情况。如果手部咬伤得不到充分治疗,可能会引发严重的局部和全身并发症,进而导致影响患者生活的功能缺陷。传统上,手部咬伤需要住院接受静脉注射抗生素治疗,在某些情况下还需要进行手术干预。咬伤发生率、住院率以及住院床位压力的不断增加,促使我们改变咬伤管理方案,转向对手部咬伤进行门诊管理。我们发现这个新方案安全、高效且具有成本效益,有更广泛实施的空间。
目的
主要结果是通过回顾实践改变前后的本地数据,评估门诊安全管理手部咬伤的可行性。次要结果是比较采用门诊方法治疗手部咬伤的财务影响。
材料与方法
对2017年三个月期间从急诊科转诊至创伤与骨科的所有首次就诊成人咨询病例进行回顾。在2023年实施更新后的手部咬伤指南后重复这一操作。对初始入院记录以及手术记录和门诊随访信件进行回顾性审查。
结果
2017年,三个月内共识别出36例患者。平均手术时间为1.19天,平均住院时间为2.36天。有2例再次手术,2例骨髓炎病例接受随访。
2023年,三个月内共识别出63例患者。平均手术时间为1.03天,平均住院时间为0.56天。为33例患者进行了37次手术,32%(20/63)的患者直接从急诊科入院。随访中没有记录到骨髓炎病例。每位患者的费用从2017年到2023年下降了40%,未考虑通货膨胀因素。
结论
随着新部门指南的实施,平均住院时间缩短,手术时间缩短,且记录在案的骨髓炎病例没有增加。平均患者费用也显著降低。这些数据表明,在不影响患者安全的情况下,可以经济高效地管理手部咬伤,而无需长时间住院。然而,必须密切随访患者并及时安排手术以确保患者安全。我们的研究结果表明需要进一步研究以加强支持我们结论的证据。