Cui Shifang, Liu Lin, Zhang Fuli
Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, CHN.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 13;16(7):e64457. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64457. eCollection 2024 Jul.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Dihuang decoction (DD), anti-inflammatory drugs (AIDs), blood circulation improvement drugs (BCIDs), and conventional therapy (CT) in the management of Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) and to establish their comparative effectiveness rankings. Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study (PICOS) design framework, we developed a detailed search strategy. The literature search included databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Weipu Journal Data, and the Chinese Biomedical Database, covering studies published up to June 2024. We included randomized controlled trials that featured the DD as the experimental intervention, with three remaining treatments as comparators. Our analysis encompassed 63 studies with 5,435 participants, divided into 2,817 in the experimental group and 2,618 in the control group. The network meta-analysis suggested that the DD potentially surpasses AIDs, BCIDs, and CT in the management of HSP. This conclusion is supported by its superior SUCRA (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking) scores across various measures, including the overall effective rate of medication, time to relief or disappearance of the rash, incidence of adverse reactions, time to relief or disappearance of abdominal pain, time to relief or disappearance of arthritic swelling or pain, IgA levels, and the relapse rate within six months (SUCRA scores: 100.0%, 88.3%, 79.8%, 94.4%, 99.9%, 88.3%, and 95.4%, respectively). In terms of overall effectiveness rate, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > AIDs > AIDs+BCID > BCID > CT. Regarding rash relief and regression time, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > CT > AIDs+BCID > AIDs. For the incidence rate of adverse reactions, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > CT > AIDs > BCID > AIDs+BCID. For the relief and disappearance of abdominal pain, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > CT > AIDs+BCID > AIDs. In terms of relief and disappearance of joint swelling and pain, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > AIDs+BCID > AIDs. Regarding IgA changes, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > CT > BCID > AIDs+BCID > AIDs. For the six-month recurrence rate, the SUCRA efficacy rankings are as follows: DD > AIDs > AIDs+BCID > CT. The DD appears to be a more effective alternative for treating HSP compared to AIDs, BCIDs, and CT. We hope that this study will provide better assistance to clinical practice.
本系统评价旨在评估地黄汤(DD)、抗炎药(AIDs)、改善血液循环药物(BCIDs)和传统疗法(CT)在治疗过敏性紫癜(HSP)中的疗效,并确定它们的相对有效性排名。我们采用人群、干预措施、对照、结局、研究(PICOS)设计框架制定了详细的检索策略。文献检索包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、万方数据、维普期刊数据库和中国生物医学数据库等数据库,涵盖截至2024年6月发表的研究。我们纳入了以DD作为实验干预措施、其余三种治疗方法作为对照的随机对照试验。我们的分析涵盖了63项研究,共5435名参与者,分为实验组2817名和对照组2618名。网络荟萃分析表明,在HSP的治疗中,DD可能优于AIDs、BCIDs和CT。这一结论得到了其在各项指标上较高的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)分数的支持,这些指标包括药物总体有效率、皮疹缓解或消失时间、不良反应发生率、腹痛缓解或消失时间、关节肿胀或疼痛缓解或消失时间、IgA水平以及六个月内的复发率(SUCRA分数分别为:100.0%、88.3%、79.8%、94.4%、99.9%、88.3%和95.4%)。在总体有效率方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>AIDs>AIDs + BCID>BCID>CT。在皮疹缓解和消退时间方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>CT>AIDs + BCID>AIDs。在不良反应发生率方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>CT>AIDs>BCID>AIDs + BCID。在腹痛缓解和消失方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>CT>AIDs + BCID>AIDs。在关节肿胀和疼痛缓解及消失方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>AIDs + BCID>AIDs。在IgA变化方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>CT>BCID>AIDs + BCID>AIDs。在六个月复发率方面,SUCRA疗效排名如下:DD>AIDs>AIDs + BCID>CT。与AIDs、BCIDs和CT相比,DD似乎是治疗HSP更有效的选择。我们希望这项研究能为临床实践提供更好的帮助。