Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO; and.
Department of Surgery; Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):426-430. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002825.
To determine the effectiveness of an updated protocol that increased the transfusion threshold to perform preperitoneal pelvic packing in patients with pelvic ring injuries and hemodynamic instability (HDI).
Retrospective review.
Urban level 1 trauma center.
Severely injured (injury severity score > 15) patients with pelvic ring injuries treated before and after increasing the threshold to perform preperitoneal pelvic packing from 2 to 4 units of red blood cells (RBCs). HDI was defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg.
Mortality from hemorrhage, anterior pelvic space infections, and venous thromboembolisms before and after increasing preperitoneal pelvic packing threshold.
One hundred sixty-six patients were included: 93 treated under the historical protocol and 73 treated under the updated protocol. HDI was present in 46.2% (n = 43) of the historical protocol group and 49.3% (n = 36) of the updated protocol group (P = 0.69). The median age of patients with HDI was 35.0 years (interquartile range 26.0-52.0), 74.7% (n = 59) were men, and the median injury severity score was 41.0 (interquartile range 29.0-50.0). Patients with HDI in the updated protocol group had a lower heart rate on presentation (105.0 vs. 120.0; P = 0.004), required less units of RBCs over the first 24 hours (6.0 vs. 8.0, P = 0.03), and did not differ in age, injury severity score, systolic blood pressure on arrival, base deficit or lactate on arrival, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, resuscitative thoracotomy, angioembolization, or anterior pelvis open reduction internal fixation (P > 0.05). The number of PPPs performed decreased under the new protocol (8.3% vs. 65.1%, P < 0.0001), and there were fewer anterior pelvic infections (0.0% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.02), fewer VTEs (8.3% vs. 30.2%; P = 0.02), and no difference in deaths from acute hemorrhagic shock (5.6% vs. 7.0%, P = 1.00).
Increasing the transfusion threshold from 2 to 4 units of red blood cells to perform pelvic packing in severely injured patients with pelvic ring injuries decreased anterior pelvic space infections and venous thromboembolisms without affecting deaths from acute hemorrhage.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
确定增加输血阈值以对骨盆环损伤伴血流动力学不稳定(HDI)患者进行腹膜前盆腔填塞的更新方案的有效性。
回顾性研究。
城市一级创伤中心。
接受治疗的严重损伤(损伤严重程度评分> 15 分)患者骨盆环损伤,并在增加腹膜前盆腔填塞阈值从 2 到 4 单位红细胞(RBC)之前和之后。HDI 定义为收缩压<90mmHg。
增加腹膜前盆腔填塞阈值前后出血性休克、前盆腔空间感染和静脉血栓栓塞的死亡率。
共纳入 166 例患者:93 例接受历史方案治疗,73 例接受更新方案治疗。历史方案组中 46.2%(n=43)和更新方案组中 49.3%(n=36)存在 HDI(P=0.69)。HDI 患者的中位年龄为 35.0 岁(四分位距 26.0-52.0),74.7%(n=59)为男性,损伤严重程度评分为 41.0(四分位距 29.0-50.0)。更新方案组中存在 HDI 的患者在就诊时心率较低(105.0 比 120.0;P=0.004),前 24 小时内需要的 RBC 单位较少(6.0 比 8.0,P=0.03),且年龄、损伤严重程度评分、入院时收缩压、基础不足或入院时乳酸、主动脉腔内修复球囊阻断复苏术、开胸复苏术、血管栓塞术或前骨盆切开复位内固定术(P>0.05)无差异。新方案中实施的 PPP 数量减少(8.3%比 65.1%,P<0.0001),前盆腔感染减少(0.0%比 13.9%,P=0.02),静脉血栓栓塞减少(8.3%比 30.2%;P=0.02),急性出血性休克死亡无差异(5.6%比 7.0%,P=1.00)。
增加输血阈值从 2 到 4 单位红细胞以对骨盆环损伤严重的患者进行骨盆填塞,可减少前盆腔空间感染和静脉血栓栓塞,而不会影响急性出血性休克的死亡率。
治疗性 III 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。