School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Sydney, Chippendale, Australia.
School of Psychology, The University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1181-1188. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01751-9. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Codeine was rescheduled in Australia to prescription only in February 2018. Initial studies reported an increase in population level paracetamol and ibuprofen sales following codeine upscheduling. However, to date no study has been able to investigate changes in non-opioid analgesic use at the individual patient level to determine if sales data reflect actual consumption patterns.
To address this gap, we aimed to determine the impact of codeine rescheduling on non-opioid analgesic use in people who regularly used over-the-counter codeine, primarily for pain, prior to the rescheduling change.
We conducted a prospective cohort study with 260 participants who reported regular over-the-counter codeine consumption at cohort entry. Surveys were completed at baseline (November 2017, 3 months before rescheduling) and at 1 month (February 2018), 4 months (June 2018), and 12 months (February 2019), following rescheduling. The primary outcomes were mean daily doses of non-opioid analgesics, captured through a 7 day medication diary.
The mean daily paracetamol dose decreased from 1754.4 mg (95% CI 1300.5-2208.3) at baseline to 1023.8 mg (95% CI 808.5-1239.1) at the final time-point (+ 12 months) (p = .009). The mean daily ibuprofen dose decreased from 305.1mg (95% CI 217.9-392.4) at baseline to 161.2 mg (95% CI 98.5-224.0) 12 months after rescheduling (p = .03). No significant change in doses of other medications remained was found.
In people who regularly consumed over-the-counter codeine, doses of non-opioid analgesics either reduced or remained stable following codeine rescheduling, suggesting concerns of medication substitution or overuse following the change were not realised.
2018 年 2 月,澳大利亚将可待因处方药化。最初的研究报告称,可待因上调处方级别后,人群中扑热息痛和布洛芬的销量有所增加。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究能够调查个体患者层面非阿片类镇痛药使用的变化,以确定销售数据是否反映实际消费模式。
为了解决这一差距,我们旨在确定可待因重新安排对经常使用非处方可待因(主要用于止痛)的人群中非阿片类镇痛药使用的影响,在此之前进行了重新安排。
我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 260 名在队列入组时报告经常使用非处方可待因的参与者。在重新安排之前的基线(2017 年 11 月,即 3 个月)、1 个月(2018 年 2 月)、4 个月(2018 年 6 月)和 12 个月(2019 年 2 月)进行了调查。主要结局指标是通过 7 天用药日记记录的非阿片类镇痛药的平均日剂量。
与基线时的平均每日扑热息痛剂量 1754.4mg(95%CI 1300.5-2208.3)相比,最终时间点(+12 个月)的平均每日扑热息痛剂量为 1023.8mg(95%CI 808.5-1239.1)(p=0.009)。与基线时的平均每日布洛芬剂量 305.1mg(95%CI 217.9-392.4)相比,重新安排后 12 个月的平均每日布洛芬剂量为 161.2mg(95%CI 98.5-224.0)(p=0.03)。其他药物剂量无显著变化。
在经常使用非处方可待因的人群中,可待因重新安排后,非阿片类镇痛药的剂量要么减少,要么保持稳定,这表明人们担心改变后会出现药物替代或过度使用。