Palangio M, Damask M J, Morris E, Doyle R T, Jiang J G, Landau C J, de Padova A
Medical Affairs Department, Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Mount Olive, New Jersey 07828-1234, USA.
Clin Ther. 2000 Jul;22(7):879-92. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80060-0.
The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of combination hydrocodone 7.5 mg and ibuprofen 200 mg with that of combination codeine 30 mg and acetaminophen 300 mg for the treatment of chronic pain.
Hydrocodone 7.5 mg with ibuprofen 200 mg is the only approved fixed-dose combination analgesic containing an opioid and ibuprofen.
In this randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, repeated-dose, active-comparator, 4-week, multicenter study, 469 patients were randomly assigned to receive a 1-tablet (n = 156) or 2-tablet (n = 153) dose of combination hydrocodone 7.5 mg and ibuprofen 200 mg (HI1 and HI2, respectively) or a 2-tablet dose of combination codeine 30 mg and acetaminophen 300 mg (CA, n = 160), the active comparator, every 6 to 8 hours as needed for pain. Efficacy was measured through pain relief scores, number of daily doses of study medication, number of daily doses of supplemental analgesics, number of patients who discontinued therapy due to an unsatisfactory analgesic response, and global assessment scores.
Of the 469 patients, 255 (54.4%) were female and 214 (45.6%) were male. The mean age was 51.1 years. Types of chronic pain included back (214; 45.6%), arthritic (145; 30.9%), other musculoskeletal (65; 13.9%), cancer (6; 1.3%), diabetic neuropathic (3; 0.6%), postherpetic neuralgic (5; 1.1%), other neurologic (21; 4.5%), and other unclassified chronic pain (10; 2.1%). During the 48 hours prior to the study, 351 (74.8%) patients had been treated with opioid or opioid-nonopioid combination analgesics. The overall mean daily pain relief score was significantly greater in the HI2 group (2.25+/-0.89) than in the HI1 group (1.98+/-0.87) (P = 0.003) or the CA group (1.85+/-0.96) (P < 0.001). The overall mean number of daily doses of study medication was significantly less in the HI2 group (2.94+/-0.99) than in the HI1 group (3.23+/-0.76) (P = 0.036) or the CA group (3.26+/-0.75) (P = 0.014). The overall mean number of daily doses of supplemental analgesics was significantly less in the HI2 group (0.24+/-0.49) than in the HI1 group (0.34+/-0.58) (P = 0.021) or CA group (0.49+/-0.85) (P = 0.010). The number of patients who discontinued treatment due to an unsatisfactory analgesic response was significantly less in the HI2 group (2; 1.3%) than in the CA group (12; 7.5%) (P = 0.008). HI2 was more effective than HI1 and CA as measured by pain relief scores for week 1 (P < 0.001 vs HI1 and CA), week 2 (P < 0.001 vs HI1 and CA), and week 3 (P = 0.008 vs HI1 and P < 0.001 vs CA); daily doses of study medication for week 1 (P = 0.019 vs HI1 and P = 0.011 vs CA); daily doses of supplemental analgesics for week 1 (P = 0.010 vs HI1 and CA); and global assessment scores for week 1 (P = 0.018 vs HI1 and P < 0.001 vs CA), week 2 (P = 0.005 vs HI1 and P < 0.001 vs CA), and week 4 (P = 0.013 vs HI1 and P = 0.023 vs CA). There were no significant differences between HI1 and CA in any efficacy variable. There were no significant differences in the number of patients experiencing adverse events in the HI2 (127; 83%), HI1 (124; 79.5%), and CA (129; 80.6%) groups. However, the mean number of patients who discontinued treatment due to adverse events was significantly greater in the HI2 group (40; 26.1%) than in the HI1 group (23; 14.7%) (P = 0.013).
The results of this study suggest that 2-tablet doses of combination hydrocodone 7.5 mg and ibuprofen 200 mg may be more effective than either 1-tablet doses of this combination or 2-tablet doses of combination codeine 30 mg and acetaminophen 300 mg. Moreover, 1-tablet doses of combination hydrocodone 7.5 mg and ibuprofen 200 mg may be as effective as 2-tablet doses of combination codeine 30 mg and acetaminophen 300 mg.
本研究旨在比较氢可酮7.5毫克与布洛芬200毫克联合用药和可待因30毫克与对乙酰氨基酚300毫克联合用药治疗慢性疼痛的疗效。
氢可酮7.5毫克与布洛芬200毫克是唯一获批的含阿片类药物和布洛芬的固定剂量复方镇痛药。
在这项随机、平行组、双盲、重复给药、活性对照、为期4周的多中心研究中,469例患者被随机分配,根据疼痛情况按需每6至8小时接受1片(n = 156)或2片(n = 153)剂量的氢可酮7.5毫克与布洛芬200毫克联合用药(分别为HI1和HI2),或2片剂量的可待因30毫克与对乙酰氨基酚300毫克联合用药(CA,n = 160),后者为活性对照药。通过疼痛缓解评分、研究药物每日剂量数、补充镇痛药每日剂量数、因镇痛效果不佳而停药的患者人数以及整体评估评分来衡量疗效。
469例患者中,255例(54.4%)为女性,214例(45.6%)为男性。平均年龄为51.1岁。慢性疼痛类型包括背部疼痛(214例;45.6%)、关节炎疼痛(145例;30.9%)、其他肌肉骨骼疼痛(65例;13.9%)、癌症疼痛(6例;1.3%)、糖尿病性神经病变疼痛(3例;0.6%)、带状疱疹后神经痛(5例;1.1%)、其他神经疼痛(21例;4.5%)以及其他未分类的慢性疼痛(10例;2.1%)。在研究前48小时内,351例(74.8%)患者接受过阿片类或阿片类 - 非阿片类复方镇痛药治疗。HI2组的总体平均每日疼痛缓解评分(2.25±0.89)显著高于HI1组(1.98±0.87)(P = 0.003)或CA组(1.85±0.96)(P < 0.001)。HI2组的研究药物每日总体平均剂量数(2.94±0.99)显著少于HI1组(3.23±0.76)(P = 0.036)或CA组(3.26±0.75)(P = 0.014)。HI2组的补充镇痛药每日总体平均剂量数(0.24±0.49)显著少于HI1组(0.34±0.58)(P = 0.021)或CA组(0.49±‘0.85)(P = 0.010)。因镇痛效果不佳而停药的患者人数,HI2组(2例;1.3%)显著少于CA组(12例;7.5%)(P = 0.008)。在第1周(与HI1和CA相比,P < 0.001)、第2周(与HI1和CA相比,P < 0.001)和第3周(与HI1相比,P = 0.008;与CA相比,P < 0.001)的疼痛缓解评分、第1周的研究药物每日剂量数(与HI1相比,P = 0.019;与CA相比,P = 0.011)、第1周的补充镇痛药每日剂量数(与HI1和CA相比,P = 0.010)以及第1周(与HI1相比,P = 0.018;与CA相比,P < 0.001)、第2周(与HI1相比,P = 0.005;与CA相比,P < 0.001)和第4周(与HI1相比,P = 0.013;与CA相比,P = 0.023)的整体评估评分方面,HI2比HI1和CA更有效。在任何疗效变量方面,HI1和CA之间均无显著差异。HI2组(127例;83%)、HI1组(124例;79.5%)和CA组(129例;80.6%)发生不良事件的患者人数无显著差异。然而,因不良事件而停药的患者平均人数,HI2组(40例;26.1%)显著多于HI1组(’23例;14.7%)(P = 0.013)。
本研究结果表明,2片剂量的氢可酮7.5毫克与布洛芬200毫克联合用药可能比该组合的1片剂量或2片剂量的可待因30毫克与对乙酰氨基酚300毫克联合用药更有效。此外,1片剂量的氢可酮7.5毫克与布洛芬200毫克联合用药可能与2片剂量的可待因30毫克与对乙酰氨基酚300毫克联合用药效果相当。