Zhuang Caywin, Dexter Franklin, Hadler Rachel A
From the Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Division of Management Consulting, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Dec 1;139(6):1232-1239. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006907. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Promptly assessing and treating the distress of intensive care unit (ICU) patients may improve long-term psychological outcomes. One holistic approach to reduce patient distress is through dignity-centered care, traditionally used in palliative care. The 25-item Patient Dignity Inventory has construct validity and reliability for measuring dignity-related distress among ICU patients. Because family members often serve as ICU patients' surrogates and play an integral role in patients' dignity, we examined whether family members reliably recognized ICU patients' sources of distress.
Two single-center observational studies of adult ICU patients were performed from May to June 2022. Inclusion criteria were ICU length-of-stay >48 hours, awake and alert, intact cognition, and no delirium. Study #1 evaluated concordance between patient and family for dignity-related distress. Both completed the Patient Dignity Inventory independently. The next Study #2 measured how many distressing items that the patient reported discussing with family members.
Study #1 of concordance had 33 patient-family dyads complete the Patient Dignity Inventory. The concordance correlation coefficient was small, 0.20 (99% confidence interval -0.21 to 0.55) and less than the inventory's test-retest reliability (r = .85). Study #2 examined sharing of Patient Dignity Inventory-related items between patients and family members. There were 12 of 19 patients who had severe distress based on an average Patient Dignity Inventory item score ≥1.92. The median patient shared multiple items of distress with their family (median 12, 99% 2-sided exact Hodges-Lehmann interval 4.0-17.5).
Although ICU patients often report sharing sources of distress with their loved ones, family members cannot accurately or reliably assess the extent to which patients experience psychosocial, existential, and symptom-related distress during critical illness. Treatments of distress should not be delayed by the absence of family members.
及时评估和治疗重症监护病房(ICU)患者的痛苦可能会改善长期心理结局。一种减少患者痛苦的整体方法是通过以尊严为中心的护理,这种护理传统上用于姑息治疗。25项患者尊严量表在测量ICU患者与尊严相关的痛苦方面具有结构效度和信度。由于家庭成员通常充当ICU患者的替代者,并在患者的尊严方面发挥不可或缺的作用,我们研究了家庭成员是否能可靠地识别ICU患者的痛苦来源。
2022年5月至6月对成年ICU患者进行了两项单中心观察性研究。纳入标准为ICU住院时间>48小时、清醒且警觉、认知完整且无谵妄。研究1评估了患者和家属在与尊严相关的痛苦方面的一致性。双方独立完成患者尊严量表。接下来的研究2测量了患者报告与家庭成员讨论的痛苦项目数量。
一致性研究1有33对患者-家属完成了患者尊严量表。一致性相关系数较小,为0.20(99%置信区间-0.21至0.55),低于该量表的重测信度(r = 0.85)。研究2检查了患者和家庭成员之间患者尊严量表相关项目的分享情况。19名患者中有12名基于平均患者尊严量表项目得分≥1.92而存在严重痛苦。患者中位数与家人分享了多个痛苦项目(中位数12,99%双侧精确霍奇斯-莱曼区间4.0-17.5)。
尽管ICU患者经常报告与亲人分享痛苦来源,但家庭成员无法准确或可靠地评估患者在危重病期间经历心理社会、生存和症状相关痛苦的程度。不应因家庭成员不在场而延迟痛苦治疗。