BOGOMOLETS NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, KYIV, UKRAINE.
BORYS GRINCHENKO KYIV METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY, KYIV, UKRAINE.
Wiad Lek. 2024;77(5):985-991. doi: 10.36740/WLek202405117.
Aim: Theoretical analysis of the problem of the individual's vitality in the context of its reflective determination, an empirical study of the formation of its components, and the proof of correlations with various types of reflection.
Materials and Methods: The following psychodiagnostic methods were used in the empirical study: "Methodology of vitality diagnosis" by S. Maddi in an adaptation by D. Leontiev; test for determining the reflection of interpersonal interaction T. Pushkar in the modification of N. Senchyna; the method of research of reflexivity of thinking (T. Pashukova, A. Dopira, G. Dyakonov); the technique "Determining the level of reflection" (O. Anisimov); method "Determining the level of reflexivity" (A. Karpov, V. Ponomaryova).
Results: It was established that the majority of students in both the first and fourth years have an average and low level of vitality. Vitality is directly connected to intellectual, personal, and situational reflection on a temporal basis; that is, the specified types of reflection are the leading determinants of vitality, which is statistically proven.
Conclusions: The study showed the high importance of resilience for the full functioning of student youth in modern complex life conditions and its determination by the level of development of various types of reflection.
在其反思性决定的背景下分析个体生命力问题,实证研究其组成部分的形成,并证明与各种类型的反思的相关性。
材料和方法:在实证研究中使用了以下心理诊断方法:S. Maddi 在 D. Leontiev 改编版中的“生命力诊断方法”;T. Pushkar 用于确定人际互动反射的测试,在 N. Senchyna 的修改版中;思维反思性研究方法(T. Pashukova、A. Dopira、G. Dyakonov);“确定反射水平”的技术(O. Anisimov);“确定反射水平”的方法(A. Karpov、V. Ponomaryova)。
结果:研究发现,一、四年级的大多数学生的生命力水平处于中等和低等水平。生命力与智力、个人和情境的反思在时间上直接相关;也就是说,指定类型的反思是生命力的主要决定因素,这在统计学上得到了证明。
结论:该研究表明,适应能力对现代复杂生活条件下学生青年的全面运作非常重要,其由各种类型的反思的发展水平决定。