Key Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov;105(11):2127-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.019. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
To compare balance control and ankle proprioception between athletes with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI). A further objective was to explore the relationship between balance control performance and ankle proprioception in athletes with CAI.
Cross-sectional study.
Sports Rehabilitation Laboratory.
Eighty-eight recreational athletes (47 CAI and 41 healthy control) were recruited.
No applicable.
Balance control performance was assessed using the sway velocity of the center of the pressure during the one-leg standing tasks. Ankle proprioception, including joint position sense and force sense, were tested using absolute error (AE) associated with joint position reproduction and force reproduction tasks in 4 directions, that is, plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion.
Athletes with CAI performed significantly worse than those without CAI in balance control tasks. In addition, CAI athletes showed significantly worse joint position sense and force sense in all 3 movement directions tested (plantarflexion, inversion, and eversion). Correlation analysis showed that the AE of the plantarflexion force sense was significantly moderately correlated with medial-lateral sway velocity in the one-leg standing with eyes open and closed conditions (r=.372-.403, P=.006-.012), and the AE of inversion force sense was significantly moderately correlated with medial-lateral sway velocity in the one-leg standing with eyes open (r=.345, P=.018) in athletes with CAI, but the joint position sense measures were not (all P>0.05).
Athletes with CAI showed significantly impaired balance control performance and diminished ankle proprioception. Deficit in force sense was deemed as a moderate predictor of one-leg standing balance control deficits in athletes with dominant-side injury CAI, whereas ankle position sense may be a small predictor.
比较慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)运动员与无 CAI 运动员之间的平衡控制和踝关节本体感觉。进一步的目的是探讨 CAI 运动员平衡控制表现与踝关节本体感觉之间的关系。
横断面研究。
运动康复实验室。
招募了 88 名休闲运动员(47 名 CAI 和 41 名健康对照组)。
无。
单腿站立任务中使用压力中心的摆动速度评估平衡控制表现。使用关节位置再现和力再现任务中的绝对误差(AE)测试踝关节本体感觉,包括关节位置感和力感,在 4 个方向(即跖屈、背屈、内翻和外翻)进行测试。
CAI 运动员在平衡控制任务中的表现明显差于无 CAI 运动员。此外,CAI 运动员在所有 3 个测试运动方向(跖屈、内翻和外翻)的关节位置感和力感均明显较差。相关分析显示,在闭眼和睁眼单腿站立条件下,跖屈力感觉的 AE 与内外侧摆动速度呈显著中度相关(r=.372-.403,P=.006-.012),而在睁眼单腿站立时,内翻力感觉的 AE 与内外侧摆动速度呈显著中度相关(r=.345,P=.018),但关节位置感测量值则没有(均 P>.05)。
CAI 运动员的平衡控制表现明显受损,踝关节本体感觉下降。力感觉的缺陷被认为是优势侧损伤 CAI 运动员单腿站立平衡控制缺陷的中度预测因素,而踝关节位置感觉可能是一个较小的预测因素。