• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-sectional study to evaluate patients' medication management with a new model of care: incorporating a pharmacist into a community specialist palliative care telehealth service.横断面研究评估新的护理模式下患者的药物管理情况:在社区专科姑息治疗远程医疗服务中加入药剂师。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 16;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01508-1.
2
Potentially inappropriate medication at hospital admission in patients with palliative care needs.有姑息治疗需求的患者入院时的潜在不适当用药。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Oct;39(5):1018-1030. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0518-3. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
Pharmacist-led medication assessment and deprescribing intervention for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a pilot study.药师主导的药物评估和减少老年癌症和多种药物治疗患者用药的干预:一项试点研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Dec;26(12):4105-4113. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4281-3. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Appropriateness of Medications in Older Adults Living With Frailty: Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Structured Medication Review Process in Primary Care.衰弱老年人用药的适宜性:初级保健中由药剂师主导的结构化药物审查流程的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719890227. doi: 10.1177/2150132719890227.
5
Pharmacist-led medication review in a residential in-reach service leads to deprescribing.药剂师主导的住院延伸服务中的药物审查导致了减药。
Australas J Ageing. 2023 Dec;42(4):675-682. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13215. Epub 2023 May 17.
6
A Pharmacist-Led Program to Evaluate and Reduce Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older HIV-Positive Patients.药师主导的方案评估和减少老年 HIV 阳性患者的多种用药和潜在不适当处方。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Dec;37(12):1498-1506. doi: 10.1002/phar.2043. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing for people living with dementia and polypharmacy in primary care: A pilot study.药剂师主导的远程医疗减药用于初级保健中患有痴呆症和多种药物治疗的人群:一项试点研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):1973-1984. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18867. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
Integrating Innovative Telehealth Solutions into an Interprofessional Team-Delivered Chronic Care Management Pilot Program.将创新型远程医疗解决方案整合到跨专业团队提供的慢性病管理试点计划中。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Aug;24(8):813-818. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.8.813.
9
A nationwide survey of hospital pharmacist interventions to improve polypharmacy for patients with cancer in palliative care in Japan.一项关于日本医院药剂师干预措施以改善姑息治疗中癌症患者多重用药情况的全国性调查。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2019 Jul 3;5:14. doi: 10.1186/s40780-019-0143-5. eCollection 2019.
10
Medication management for community palliative care patients and the role of a specialist palliative care pharmacist: A qualitative exploration of consumer and health care professional perspectives.社区姑息治疗患者的药物管理和专科姑息治疗药剂师的作用:消费者和医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探讨。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1369-1377. doi: 10.1177/0269216318777390. Epub 2018 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacist-led deprescribing to improve medication safety in older patients with hip fractures.由药剂师主导的减药方案以提高老年髋部骨折患者的用药安全性。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06250-8.
2
Informal Palliative Care at Home: A Focus Group Study Among Professionals Working in Palliative Care in Portugal.居家非正式姑息治疗:葡萄牙姑息治疗专业人员的焦点小组研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;13(9):978. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090978.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a new emergency department avoidance model of care, the Cancer Urgent Assessment Clinic, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.评估一种新的急诊科避用护理模式——癌症紧急评估诊所,以应对新冠疫情。
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00011-8. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Enhancing a community palliative care service with telehealth leads to efficiency gains and improves job satisfaction.通过远程医疗增强社区姑息治疗服务可提高效率并提升工作满意度。
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Dec;27(10):625-630. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211048952.
3
People's Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.澳大利亚人在 COVID-19 大流行期间对远程医疗的体验和满意度:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 10;22(12):e24531. doi: 10.2196/24531.
4
ESMO Management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: Pancreatic Cancer.ESMO 在新冠疫情时代的管理和治疗适应推荐:胰腺癌。
ESMO Open. 2020 May;5(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000804.
5
Deprescribing in Older People Approaching End of Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using STOPPFrail Criteria.老年人接近生命终点时的减药:使用 STOPPFrail 标准的随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):762-769. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16278. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Nonprescription Medication Use in Hospice Patients.临终关怀患者使用非处方药的情况。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 May;37(5):336-342. doi: 10.1177/1049909119876259. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
7
Deprescribing in palliative care.舒缓治疗中的减药。
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Jul;19(4):311-314. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-4-311.
8
Medication management for community palliative care patients and the role of a specialist palliative care pharmacist: A qualitative exploration of consumer and health care professional perspectives.社区姑息治疗患者的药物管理和专科姑息治疗药剂师的作用:消费者和医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探讨。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1369-1377. doi: 10.1177/0269216318777390. Epub 2018 May 25.
9
Medication Regimen Complexity Measured by MRCI: A Systematic Review to Identify Health Outcomes.用药方案复杂性测量工具 MRCI:一项系统评价以识别健康结局
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Nov;52(11):1117-1134. doi: 10.1177/1060028018773691. Epub 2018 May 13.
10
Pilot and feasibility studies come of age!试点研究和可行性研究已然成熟!
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2055-5784-1-1. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

横断面研究评估新的护理模式下患者的药物管理情况:在社区专科姑息治疗远程医疗服务中加入药剂师。

Cross-sectional study to evaluate patients' medication management with a new model of care: incorporating a pharmacist into a community specialist palliative care telehealth service.

机构信息

Gold Coast Supportive and Specialist Palliative Care Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.

Allied Health Research, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 16;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01508-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01508-1
PMID:39010021
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving palliative care are often on complex medication regimes to manage their symptoms and comorbidities and at high risk of medication-related problems. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the involvement of a pharmacist to an existing community specialist palliative care telehealth service on patients' medication management.

METHOD

The specialist palliative care pharmacist attended two palliative care telehealth sessions per week over a six-month period (October 2020 to March 2021). Attendance was allocated based on funding received. Data collected from the medication management reviews included prevalence of polypharmacy, number of inappropriate medication according to the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy criteria (STOPP/FRAIL) and recommendations on deprescribing, symptom control and medication management.

RESULTS

In total 95 patients participated in the pharmaceutical telehealth service with a mean age of 75.2 years (SD 10.67). Whilst 81 (85.3%) patients had a cancer diagnosis, 14 (14.7%) had a non-cancer diagnosis. At referral, 84 (88.4%, SD 4.57) patients were taking ≥ 5 medications with 51 (53.7%, SD 5.03) taking ≥ 10 medications. According to STOPP/FRAIL criteria, 142 potentially inappropriate medications were taken by 54 (56.8%) patients, with a mean of 2.6 (SD 1.16) inappropriate medications per person. Overall, 142 recommendations were accepted from the pharmaceutical medication management review including 49 (34.5%) related to deprescribing, 20 (14.0%) to medication-related problems, 35 (24.7%) to symptom management and 38 (26.8%) to medication administration.

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence regarding the value of including a pharmacist in palliative care telehealth services. Input from the pharmacist resulted in improved symptom management of community palliative care patients and their overall medication management.

摘要

背景

接受姑息治疗的患者通常需要服用复杂的药物来控制症状和合并症,并且存在药物相关问题的高风险。本横断面研究的目的是评估在现有的社区专科姑息治疗远程医疗服务中加入药剂师对患者药物管理的影响。

方法

在六个月的时间里(2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月),专科姑息治疗药剂师每周参加两次姑息治疗远程医疗会议。参加会议的时间是根据收到的资金分配的。从药物管理审查中收集的数据包括多药并用的流行率、根据预期寿命有限的虚弱老年人的处方筛选工具(STOPP/FRAIL)标准确定的不适当药物数量以及关于减少用药、症状控制和药物管理的建议。

结果

共有 95 名患者参加了药品远程医疗服务,平均年龄为 75.2 岁(SD 10.67)。虽然 81 名(85.3%)患者患有癌症诊断,但 14 名(14.7%)患有非癌症诊断。在转介时,84 名(88.4%,SD 4.57)患者正在服用≥5 种药物,其中 51 名(53.7%,SD 5.03)患者正在服用≥10 种药物。根据 STOPP/FRAIL 标准,54 名(56.8%)患者服用了 142 种潜在不适当的药物,每人平均有 2.6 种(SD 1.16)不适当药物。总体而言,从药物管理审查中接受了 142 项建议,其中包括 49 项(34.5%)与减少用药相关、20 项(14.0%)与药物相关问题相关、35 项(24.7%)与症状管理相关和 38 项(26.8%)与药物管理相关。

结论

本研究提供了在姑息治疗远程医疗服务中纳入药剂师的价值的证据。药剂师的投入使社区姑息治疗患者的症状管理得到改善,并且他们的整体药物管理得到改善。