Andonie Raphael R, Wimmer Wilhelm, Schraivogel Stephan, Mantokoudis Georgios, Caversaccio Marco, Weder Stefan
Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ear Hear. 2025;46(1):16-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001546. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly recognized as a biomarker for assessing inner ear function in cochlear implant patients. This study aimed to objectively determine intraoperative cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude patterns and correlate them with residual hearing in cochlear implant recipients, addressing the limitations in current ECochG analysis that often depends on subjective visual assessment and overlook the intracochlear measurement location.
In this prospective study, we investigated intraoperative pure-tone ECochG following complete electrode insertion in 31 patients. We used our previously published objective analysis method to determine the maximum CM amplitude and the associated electrode position for each electrode array. Using computed tomography, we identified electrode placement and determined the corresponding tonotopic frequency using Greenwood's function. Based on this, we calculated the tonotopic shift, that is, the difference between the stimulation frequency and the estimated frequency of the electrode with the maximum CM amplitude. We evaluated the association between CM amplitude, tonotopic shift, and preoperative hearing thresholds using linear regression analysis.
CM amplitudes showed high variance, with values ranging from -1.479 to 4.495 dBµV. We found a statistically significant negative correlation ( ) between maximum CM amplitudes and preoperative hearing thresholds. In addition, a significant association ( ) between the tonotopic shift and preoperative hearing thresholds was observed. Tonotopic shifts of the maximum CM amplitudes occurred predominantly toward the basal direction.
The combination of objective signal analysis and the consideration of intracochlear measurement locations enhances the understanding of cochlear health and overcomes the obstacles of current ECochG analysis. We could show the link between intraoperative CM amplitudes, their spatial distributions, and preoperative hearing thresholds. Consequently, our findings enable automated analysis and bear the potential to enhance specificity of ECochG, reinforcing its role as an objective biomarker for cochlear health.
耳蜗电图(ECochG)越来越被认为是评估人工耳蜗植入患者内耳功能的生物标志物。本研究旨在客观地确定术中耳蜗微音电位(CM)的幅度模式,并将其与人工耳蜗植入受者的残余听力相关联,以解决当前ECochG分析中常依赖主观视觉评估且忽略耳蜗内测量位置的局限性。
在这项前瞻性研究中,我们调查了31例患者在电极完全插入后的术中纯音ECochG。我们使用之前发表的客观分析方法来确定每个电极阵列的最大CM幅度和相关电极位置。利用计算机断层扫描,我们确定电极位置,并使用格林伍德函数确定相应的音调频率。在此基础上,我们计算音调偏移,即刺激频率与具有最大CM幅度的电极的估计频率之间的差异。我们使用线性回归分析评估CM幅度、音调偏移和术前听力阈值之间的关联。
CM幅度显示出高度的变异性,值范围为-1.479至4.495 dBµV。我们发现最大CM幅度与术前听力阈值之间存在统计学上显著的负相关( )。此外,观察到音调偏移与术前听力阈值之间存在显著关联( )。最大CM幅度的音调偏移主要发生在向基底方向。
客观信号分析与耳蜗内测量位置的考虑相结合,增强了对耳蜗健康的理解,克服了当前ECochG分析的障碍。我们能够展示术中CM幅度、其空间分布与术前听力阈值之间的联系。因此,我们的研究结果实现了自动化分析,并具有提高ECochG特异性的潜力,强化了其作为耳蜗健康客观生物标志物的作用。