Suppr超能文献

关于智力遗传学的教科书式论述。

Textbook treatments of the genetics of intelligence.

作者信息

Paul D B

出版信息

Q Rev Biol. 1985 Sep;60(3):317-26. doi: 10.1086/414428.

Abstract

Genetics textbooks have been remarkably unaffected by the discovery of fraud in the work of British psychologist Sir Cyril Burt or by the resulting critical review of other classic studies on the genetics of intelligence. Although Burt's name has nearly vanished from current textbooks, his results continue to be cited in textbook discussions of the heritability of intelligence, as do the results of other studies now recognized as methodologically inadequate. Moreover, genetics textbooks consistently employ confused or misleading definitions of the concept of heritability that, together with the reporting of discredited data, perpetuate a fundamentally inaccurate understanding of the genetics of intelligence. This situation is largely attributable to the practice--generic to textbook writing but in this case taken to an extreme--of authors' liberal borrowing from one another or from a few apparently authoritative works (including earlier textbooks). The extent to which authors rely on these sources for their discussions of the genetics of intelligence is apparently a function both of the controversiality of the subject and of authors' technical insecurity, perhaps reinforced by prior assumptions about the influence of genes on variations in intellectual performance.

摘要

遗传学教科书并未因英国心理学家西里尔·伯特爵士研究中的欺诈行为被发现,或由此引发的对其他关于智力遗传学的经典研究的批判性审视而受到显著影响。尽管伯特的名字在当前教科书中几乎已消失,但他的研究结果在教科书关于智力遗传性的讨论中仍被引用,其他一些现在被认为在方法上存在不足的研究结果也是如此。此外,遗传学教科书一直对遗传性概念采用含混或误导性的定义,再加上对不可信数据的报道,使得对智力遗传学的根本不准确理解一直延续。这种情况很大程度上归因于一种做法——这是教科书编写中的普遍做法,但在这种情况下被推向了极端——即作者们相互之间或从一些明显具有权威性的著作(包括早期教科书)中大量借鉴。作者们在讨论智力遗传学问题时依赖这些资料来源的程度,显然既取决于该主题的争议性,也取决于作者们在专业上的不安全感,或许还受到关于基因对智力表现差异影响的先入之见的强化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验