Samelson F
Psychology Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506, USA.
Genetica. 1997;99(2-3):145-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02259518.
Shortly after the death, in 1971, of Cyril Burt, a prominent British psychologist, the authenticity of his accounts of intelligence test results from the largest report sample of MZA's (monozygotic twins reared apart) was challenged. Charges of fraud by Burt's critics and countercharges by his supporters started an acrimonious battle of words in journals, books, and the mass media that seesawed over the decades. It is still not resolved. The problematic ways in which the scientific community and its major organizations and journal editors have dealt or failed to deal with the problem are discussed.
1971年,英国著名心理学家西里尔·伯特去世后不久,他关于最大规模分开抚养的同卵双胞胎(MZA)智力测试结果报告样本的描述的真实性受到了质疑。伯特的批评者指控其造假,他的支持者则进行了反驳,双方在期刊、书籍和大众媒体上展开了激烈的言辞交锋,这场争论在几十年间此起彼伏。至今仍未得到解决。本文讨论了科学界及其主要组织和期刊编辑处理或未能处理该问题的有问题的方式。