• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕妇的基因知识水平及产前筛查测试的决策冲突:一项横断面研究。

Pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict about prenatal screening tests: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Yeşilçinar İlknur, Şahin Eda, Tutar Sadettin Oğuzhan

机构信息

Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.

Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1951. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1951. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1951
PMID:39010818
Abstract

Understanding the prenatal screening and diagnostic tests performed during pregnancy and making a decision in line with the test results can be a complex process for pregnant individuals and their families. Therefore, this study examined pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict regarding prenatal screening tests. The study was conducted with 328 pregnant individuals who applied to a training and research hospital to receive antenatal care between April 05 and September 30, 2021. Research data were collected by using the "Decisional Conflict Scale," "SURE Scale," and "Genetic Literacy and Comprehension Measure." The mean age of the participants was 28.69 ± 5.48, and the mean gestational week was 25.90 ± 10.43. A statistically significant difference was found between the educational levels of the pregnant individuals and the genetic literacy and comprehension scales (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between getting information about prenatal screening tests, having a screening test and decisional conflict scale, SURE Scale, and genetic literacy and comprehension scales (p < 0.001). A weak, negative, statistically significant correlation was found between the genetic literacy and comprehension familiarity and decision conflict scales (r = -0.177, p = 0.001). It is well known that pregnant individuals have difficulty understanding and interpreting test results due to prenatal screening tests that include genetic information. In our study, approximately half of the pregnant individuals received information about prenatal screening tests. Therefore, prenatal care must include the necessary information about prenatal screening tests. The study found that as the genetic literacy of pregnant individuals increased, the conflict of decisions they experienced decreased. Accordingly, it is suggested that interventions to increase genetic literacy among pregnant individuals may be effective in reducing decisional conflict regarding prenatal screening tests.

摘要

对于孕妇及其家人来说,了解孕期进行的产前筛查和诊断测试并根据测试结果做出决定可能是一个复杂的过程。因此,本研究调查了孕妇在产前筛查测试方面的基因知识水平和决策冲突。该研究对2021年4月5日至9月30日期间到一家培训和研究医院接受产前护理的328名孕妇进行。研究数据通过使用“决策冲突量表”、“SURE量表”和“基因知识与理解测量量表”收集。参与者的平均年龄为28.69±5.48岁,平均孕周为25.90±10.43周。发现孕妇的教育水平与基因知识和理解量表之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p<0.001)。在获取产前筛查测试信息、进行筛查测试与决策冲突量表、SURE量表以及基因知识和理解量表之间发现了统计学上的显著差异(p<0.001)。基因知识和理解熟悉度与决策冲突量表之间发现了微弱的、负向的、统计学上的显著相关性(r=-0.177,p=0.001)。众所周知,由于包含基因信息的产前筛查测试,孕妇在理解和解释测试结果方面存在困难。在我们的研究中,约一半的孕妇获得了产前筛查测试的信息。因此,产前护理必须包括有关产前筛查测试的必要信息。研究发现,随着孕妇基因知识水平的提高,她们经历的决策冲突减少。据此,建议提高孕妇基因知识水平的干预措施可能有助于减少产前筛查测试方面的决策冲突。

相似文献

1
Pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict about prenatal screening tests: A cross-sectional study.孕妇的基因知识水平及产前筛查测试的决策冲突:一项横断面研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1951. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1951. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Decisional conflict, anxiety, and social support among Chinese pregnant women making further prenatal testing decisions.中国孕妇在做出进一步产前检查决策时的决策冲突、焦虑及社会支持
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2025 Jan;43(1):34-46. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2023.2232380. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test.你确定吗?:使用 4 项筛查测试评估患者的决策冲突。
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Aug;56(8):e308-14.
4
Reducing decisional conflict in decisions about prenatal genetic testing: the impact of a dyadic intervention at the start of prenatal care.减少产前基因检测决策中的决策冲突:在产前保健开始时的一种双重干预的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2024 Apr 29;52(5):467-477. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0442. Print 2024 Jun 25.
5
High risk-What's next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret, and satisfaction among high-risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.高风险-下一步该怎么办?一项关于高风险孕妇在选择进一步进行胎儿非整倍体产前检测时的决策冲突、后悔和满意度的调查研究。
Prenat Diagn. 2019 Jul;39(8):635-642. doi: 10.1002/pd.5476. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
6
Women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care.女性在产前筛查和检测路径中的决策冲突:芬兰公共产科护理内的探索性研究。
J Perinat Med. 2020 Jul 28;48(6):527-537. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0450.
7
Genetic Literacy of pregnant women and their use of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests in Turkey.土耳其孕妇的基因知识素养及其对产前筛查和诊断测试的使用情况。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):578-586. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1082. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Factors influencing patients' decision-making about preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.影响患者对单基因疾病植入前遗传学检测决策的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2599-2610. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac185.
9
Counselling and education for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests for pregnant women: Randomized controlled trial.对孕妇进行产前筛查和诊断测试的咨询和教育:随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2021 Oct;27(5):e13000. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13000. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.情况复杂——产前诊断检测中决策冲突的预测因素
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):388-402. doi: 10.1111/hex.12363. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Pregnant Patient Perspectives on Genetic Privacy of Cell-Free DNA and Optimal Design of a Prenatal Genetics Video-Based Educational Intervention.一项关于孕妇对无细胞DNA遗传隐私的看法及基于视频的产前遗传学教育干预最佳设计的定性研究。
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Apr;45(4):491-499. doi: 10.1002/pd.6769. Epub 2025 Feb 25.