• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国及全球范围内糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征:一项 20 年的系统综述。

Microbiological profile of diabetic foot infections in China and worldwide: a 20-year systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

Division of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 28;15:1368046. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1368046. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2024.1368046
PMID:39010897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247326/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pathogens causing diabetic foot infections (DFIs) vary by region globally; however, knowledge of the causative organism is essential for effective empirical treatment. We aimed to determine the incidence and antibiotic susceptibility of DFI pathogens worldwide, focusing on Asia and China.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive literature search, we identified published studies on organisms isolated from DFI wounds from January 2000 to December 2020.

RESULTS

Based on our inclusion criteria, we analyzed 245 studies that cumulatively reported 38,744 patients and 41,427 isolated microorganisms. DFI pathogens varied according to time and region. Over time, the incidence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria have decreased and increased, respectively. America and Asia have the highest (62.74%) and lowest (44.82%) incidence of Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Africa has the highest incidence (26.90%) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Asia has the highest incidence (49.36%) of Gram-negative aerobic bacteria with species infection rates as follows: , 10.77%; , 3.95%; and , 11.08%, with higher local rates in China and Southeast Asia. Linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were the most active agents against Gram-positive aerobes, while imipenem and cefoperazone-sulbactam were the most active agents against Gram-negative aerobes.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review showed that over 20 years, the pathogens causing DFIs varied considerably over time and region. This data may inform local clinical guidelines on empirical antibiotic therapy for DFI in China and globally. Regular large-scale epidemiological studies are necessary to identify trends in DFI pathogenic bacteria.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023447645.

摘要

简介

全球范围内,导致糖尿病足感染(DFI)的病原体因地区而异;然而,了解致病病原体对于有效的经验性治疗至关重要。我们旨在确定全球范围内 DFI 病原体的发病率和抗生素敏感性,重点关注亚洲和中国。

方法

通过全面的文献检索,我们确定了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间从 DFI 伤口中分离出的病原体的已发表研究。

结果

根据我们的纳入标准,我们分析了 245 项研究,这些研究累计报告了 38744 例患者和 41427 株分离的微生物。DFI 病原体随时间和地区而变化。随着时间的推移,革兰阳性需氧菌和革兰阴性需氧菌的发病率分别下降和增加。美洲和亚洲的革兰阴性菌发病率最高(62.74%)和最低(44.82%)。非洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的发病率最高(26.90%)。亚洲革兰阴性需氧菌的发病率最高(49.36%),其中感染率最高的菌种如下: ,10.77%; ,3.95%; ,11.08%,中国和东南亚的局部发病率更高。对于革兰阳性需氧菌,林可霉素、万古霉素和替考拉宁是最有效的药物,而对于革兰阴性需氧菌,亚胺培南和头孢哌酮-舒巴坦是最有效的药物。

讨论

本系统综述表明,20 多年来,DFI 的病原体随时间和地区差异很大。这些数据可能为中国和全球的 DFI 经验性抗生素治疗提供本地临床指南。有必要定期进行大规模的流行病学研究,以确定 DFI 病原菌的趋势。

系统综述注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符 CRD42023447645。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/6dabe3949ab8/fendo-15-1368046-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/9ac3b5a016b9/fendo-15-1368046-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/3a7387b00e8d/fendo-15-1368046-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/8b0c64f174ad/fendo-15-1368046-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/0a8eeef2e0b5/fendo-15-1368046-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/57b2634f836b/fendo-15-1368046-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/60622da7770a/fendo-15-1368046-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/6dabe3949ab8/fendo-15-1368046-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/9ac3b5a016b9/fendo-15-1368046-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/3a7387b00e8d/fendo-15-1368046-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/8b0c64f174ad/fendo-15-1368046-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/0a8eeef2e0b5/fendo-15-1368046-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/57b2634f836b/fendo-15-1368046-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/60622da7770a/fendo-15-1368046-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b9e/11247326/6dabe3949ab8/fendo-15-1368046-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Microbiological profile of diabetic foot infections in China and worldwide: a 20-year systematic review.中国及全球范围内糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征:一项 20 年的系统综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 28;15:1368046. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1368046. eCollection 2024.
2
The microbiologic profile of diabetic foot infections in Turkey: a 20-year systematic review: diabetic foot infections in Turkey.土耳其糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征:一项20年的系统评价:土耳其的糖尿病足感染
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;33(6):871-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2047-5. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
3
Microbial Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in China: Literature Review.中国糖尿病足溃疡的微生物感染与抗生素耐药性:文献综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;13:881659. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.881659. eCollection 2022.
4
Clinical and bacteriological profile of diabetic foot infections in a tertiary care.三级护理中糖尿病足感染的临床和细菌学特征。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jun 16;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00406-y.
5
Microbiology of diabetic foot infections in three district hospital in Malaysia and comparison with South East Asian Countries.马来西亚三家地区医院糖尿病足感染的微生物学情况及与东南亚国家的比较。
Med J Malaysia. 2019 Oct;74(5):394-399.
6
Diabetic Foot Infection: Causative Pathogens and Empiric Antibiotherapy Considerations-The Experience of a Tertiary Center.糖尿病足感染:致病病原体及经验性抗生素治疗考量——一家三级医疗中心的经验
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Jun;18(2):122-128. doi: 10.1177/1534734619839815. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
A study of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Kuwait.科威特一家教学医院糖尿病足感染的微生物学研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Mar;5(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
8
Microbiological profile and antimicrobial resistance among diabetic foot infections in Lebanon.黎巴嫩糖尿病足感染的微生物谱和抗菌药物耐药性。
Int Wound J. 2020 Dec;17(6):1764-1773. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13465. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
9
[Clinical distribution and antimicrobial resistance analysis of 754 pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infection].754株糖尿病足感染病原菌的临床分布及耐药性分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Apr 1;94(12):889-94.
10
Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in Diabetic Foot Infection: A Study Focusing on the Culture and Antibiotic Sensitivity in a Population From Southern China.糖尿病足感染的经验性抗生素治疗:一项聚焦于中国南方人群培养及抗生素敏感性的研究
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2017 Sep;16(3):173-182. doi: 10.1177/1534734617725410. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonlinear association between C-reactive protein and severity of diabetic foot infection in patients with diabetes: A retrospective cohort study with clinical implications.糖尿病患者C反应蛋白与糖尿病足感染严重程度之间的非线性关联:一项具有临床意义的回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0323704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323704. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Distribution of Causative Microorganisms in Diabetic Foot Infections: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Malaysia.马来西亚中部一家三级护理医院糖尿病足感染致病微生物的分布:一项十年回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;12(4):687. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040687.
2
Microbial Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in China: Literature Review.中国糖尿病足溃疡的微生物感染与抗生素耐药性:文献综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;13:881659. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.881659. eCollection 2022.
3
The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis.
糖尿病足感染的微生物学:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7.
4
Diabetic Foot Infections: Bacterial Isolates From the Centers and Hospitals of Latin American Countries.糖尿病足感染:来自拉丁美洲国家中心和医院的细菌分离株。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2022 Dec;21(4):562-573. doi: 10.1177/1534734620976305. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Bacterial diversity and inflammatory response at first-time visit in younger and older individuals with diabetic foot infection (DFI).年轻和老年糖尿病足感染(DFI)患者初诊时的细菌多样性和炎症反应。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Feb;58(2):181-189. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01587-5. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).糖尿病足感染的诊断和治疗指南(IWGDF 2019 更新)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3280. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3280.
7
Microbiology of diabetic foot infections in three district hospital in Malaysia and comparison with South East Asian Countries.马来西亚三家地区医院糖尿病足感染的微生物学情况及与东南亚国家的比较。
Med J Malaysia. 2019 Oct;74(5):394-399.
8
The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England.英格兰国家医疗服务体系中糖尿病足溃疡和截肢的成本。
Diabet Med. 2019 Aug;36(8):995-1002. doi: 10.1111/dme.13973. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在糖尿病患者中的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Aug;56(8):907-921. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01301-0. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
10
The Significant Association between Polymicrobial Diabetic Foot Infection and Its Severity and Outcomes.多种微生物引起的糖尿病足感染与其严重程度及预后之间的显著关联。
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;26(1):107-114. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.1.10. Epub 2019 Feb 28.