Suppr超能文献

筛选俾路支骆驼()和绒山羊()的瘤胃以分离产酶细菌作为动物饲料的潜在添加剂。

Screening the Rumen of Balochi Camel () and Cashmere Goat () to Isolate Enzyme-Producing Bacteria as Potential Additives for Animal Feed.

作者信息

Gheibipour Maryam, Ghiasi Seyyed Ehsan, Bashtani Moslem, Torbati Mohammad Bagher Montazer, Motamedi Hossein

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

Research Group of Environmental Stress in Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

出版信息

Indian J Microbiol. 2024 Jun;64(2):572-582. doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01197-7. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Abstract

Rumen microbiology has made a significant contribution to the discovery of biodegradation processes, which convert nutrients into energy for ruminants. Therefore, understanding the enzymatic potential in the rumen of different animal species is essential for developing efficient microbial feed additives. The aim of this study was to isolate enzyme-producing bacteria (EPBs) from the rumen of the Balochi camel () and Cashmere goat () as potential additives for animal feed. The EPBs were screened based on the hydrolysis of carboxyl methyl cellulose, tannin, starch, and bovine serum albumin. The isolates were then subjected to enzyme activity assays and molecular characterization. Additionally, they were evaluated for their antagonistic effects, antibiotic susceptibility, and growth in acidic, bile, and saline media. Thirteen enzyme-producing strains were identified in the rumen of the camels and goats, belonging to the genera , , , and . The highest and lowest tannase activities were recorded for GHMGHE41 (10.46 Um/l) and GHMGHE15 (1.83 Um/l), respectively. GHMGHE18 (2.03 U/ml) was the most effective cellulolytic isolate, compared to strains (1.05 Um/l). The highest protease producer was GHMGHE13 (3.00 U/ml), while GHMGHE17 (1.13 U/ml) had the lowest activity. GHMGHE13 (1.55 U/ml) and GHMGHE19 (1.26 U/ml) were the highest and lowest producers of amylase, respectively. The strains exhibited mixed responses to antibiotics and remained stable under stressful conditions. These findings indicate that ruminal EPBs have the potential to be used in animal feed, pending further in vivo studies.

摘要

瘤胃微生物学对生物降解过程的发现做出了重大贡献,该过程将营养物质转化为反刍动物的能量。因此,了解不同动物物种瘤胃中的酶潜力对于开发高效的微生物饲料添加剂至关重要。本研究的目的是从俾路支骆驼()和绒山羊()的瘤胃中分离产酶细菌(EPB),作为动物饲料的潜在添加剂。基于羧甲基纤维素、单宁、淀粉和牛血清白蛋白的水解对EPB进行筛选。然后对分离株进行酶活性测定和分子表征。此外,还评估了它们的拮抗作用、抗生素敏感性以及在酸性、胆汁和盐培养基中的生长情况。在骆驼和山羊的瘤胃中鉴定出13株产酶菌株,分别属于、、、和属。GHMGHE41(10.46 Um/l)和GHMGHE15(1.83 Um/l)的单宁酶活性分别最高和最低。与菌株(1.05 Um/l)相比,GHMGHE18(2.03 U/ml)是最有效的纤维素分解分离株。蛋白酶产量最高的是GHMGHE13(3.00 U/ml),而GHMGHE17(1.13 U/ml)的活性最低。淀粉酶产量最高和最低的分别是GHMGHE13(1.55 U/ml)和GHMGHE19(1.26 U/ml)。这些菌株对抗生素表现出混合反应,并且在应激条件下保持稳定。这些发现表明,瘤胃EPB有潜力用于动物饲料,但有待进一步的体内研究。

相似文献

1
Screening the Rumen of Balochi Camel () and Cashmere Goat () to Isolate Enzyme-Producing Bacteria as Potential Additives for Animal Feed.
Indian J Microbiol. 2024 Jun;64(2):572-582. doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01197-7. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Degradation of euptox A by tannase-producing rumen bacteria from migratory goats.
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Nov;123(5):1194-1202. doi: 10.1111/jam.13563. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
Unraveling the camel rumen microbiome through metaculturomics approach for agriculture waste hydrolytic potential.
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Jan;203(1):107-123. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-02010-x. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
5
Screening and evaluation of the ruminal cellulolytic bacteria and their potential application as probiotics.
Iran J Microbiol. 2024 Jun;16(3):389-400. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v16i3.15796.
7
Isolation and identification of a cellulolytic from rumen of Aceh cattle.
Vet World. 2017 Dec;10(12):1515-1520. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1515-1520. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
8
Community structure and fibrolytic activities of anaerobic rumen fungi in dromedary camels.
J Basic Microbiol. 2019 Jan;59(1):101-110. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201800323. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Foregut microbiology of the Arabian camel ().
Anim Front. 2022 Aug 12;12(4):46-51. doi: 10.1093/af/vfac049. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Engineering the probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 as an efficient cell factory for heparosan biosynthesis.
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2022 Aug;158:110038. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2022.110038. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Tracing probiotic producing bacterial species from gut of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis), South-East-Asia.
Braz J Biol. 2022 Mar 11;84:e259094. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.259094. eCollection 2022.
5
Isolation of bacterial consortia with probiotic potential from the rumen of tropical calves.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2023 Jan;107(1):62-76. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13699. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
Lignocelluloytic activities and composition of bacterial community in the camel rumen.
AIMS Microbiol. 2021 Sep 24;7(3):354-367. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021022. eCollection 2021.
7
Implication and challenges of direct-fed microbial supplementation to improve ruminant production and health.
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 12;12(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00630-x.
10
Unraveling the camel rumen microbiome through metaculturomics approach for agriculture waste hydrolytic potential.
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Jan;203(1):107-123. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-02010-x. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验