Suppr超能文献

数字艺术体验中标签的有效性:心理生理和行为证据。

Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.

作者信息

Castellotti Serena, D'Agostino Ottavia, Del Viva Maria Michela

机构信息

Department of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 1;15:1342667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1342667. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays museums make large use of digital materials (e.g., virtual tours) to attract visitors. Therefore, it is worthwhile investigating which variables affect the engagement with art outside the museum, and whether digital reproductions of artworks are as effective as museum originals in producing a satisfying aesthetic experience.

METHODS

Here we tested the effectiveness of introducing additional informative materials on the artistic enjoyment of contemporary paintings presented on a computer screen. Naïve observers were exposed to essential and descriptive labels before viewing artworks. We flanked traditional measurement methods - viewing times and questionnaires, with biometric parameters - pupil responses, eye movements, heart rate, and electrodermal activity. The results were then compared to our previous museum study that adopted the same experimental paradigm.

RESULTS

Our behavioral and psychophysiological data lead to a complex pattern of results. As found in the museum setting, providing detailed descriptions decreases complexity, evokes more positive sensations, and induces pupil dilation but does not enhance aesthetic appreciation. These results suggested that informative labels improve understanding and emotions but have a limited impact on the hedonic evaluation of artworks in both contexts. However, other results do not mirror those found in the museum; in the laboratory setting, participants spend a similar amount of time, have a comparable gaze behavior, and their electrodermal activity and heart rate do not change when viewing artworks with different types of labels. The main difference between the lab and museum settings is the shorter time spent viewing digital reproductions vs. real paintings, although subjective ratings (e.g., liking, interest) are comparable.

DISCUSSION

Overall, this study indicates that the environmental context does impact the aesthetic experience; although, some beneficial effects of introducing additional relevant content in labels accompanying artworks can also be acquainted through digital media outside of the museum.

摘要

引言

如今,博物馆大量使用数字资料(如虚拟游览)来吸引参观者。因此,研究哪些变量会影响博物馆外艺术作品的吸引力,以及艺术作品的数字复制品在产生令人满意的审美体验方面是否与博物馆原作一样有效,是很有价值的。

方法

在这里,我们测试了引入额外信息材料对在电脑屏幕上展示的当代绘画艺术欣赏效果的影响。在观看艺术作品之前,让没有相关知识的观察者接触基本和描述性标签。我们在传统测量方法(观看时间和问卷调查)的基础上,增加了生物特征参数(瞳孔反应、眼球运动、心率和皮肤电活动)。然后将结果与我们之前采用相同实验范式的博物馆研究进行比较。

结果

我们的行为和心理生理数据得出了复杂的结果模式。正如在博物馆环境中所发现的那样,提供详细描述会降低复杂性,引发更积极的感觉,并导致瞳孔扩张,但不会提高审美欣赏水平。这些结果表明,信息标签在两种情况下都能提高理解和情感,但对艺术作品的享乐评价影响有限。然而,其他结果与在博物馆中发现的结果并不相同;在实验室环境中,参与者观看不同类型标签的艺术作品时,花费的时间相似,注视行为相当,皮肤电活动和心率也没有变化。实验室和博物馆环境之间的主要区别在于,观看数字复制品的时间比观看真实绘画的时间短,尽管主观评分(如喜欢程度、兴趣)相当。

讨论

总体而言,这项研究表明环境背景确实会影响审美体验;尽管如此,通过博物馆外的数字媒体也可以了解到在艺术作品附带标签中引入额外相关内容的一些有益效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f4/11248719/99bfaea8887d/fpsyg-15-1342667-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验