• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利南蒂罗尔地区发生杀亲案件后,心理健康专业人员和普通民众(包括精神障碍患者、亲属以及无直接或间接接触者)的情绪反应和污名化。

Emotional reactions and stigmatization after a parricide in South Tyrol, Italy, among mental health professionals and the general population, including persons with mental disorders, relatives, and persons with no direct or indirect contact.

机构信息

Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Sports, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;12:1388842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388842. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388842
PMID:39011331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247646/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted on the occasion of the parricide in Bolzano (South Tyrol, Italy) in January 2021. The psychological impact of parricide on the general population and on mental health professionals has scarcely been investigated to the present day. Studies on stigmatization show differences between various groups. The aim was to analyze the emotional reactions to the parricide and the stigmatization of persons with mental disorders in the South Tyrolian population.

METHODS

In September 2022, 121 mental health professionals of the Department of Psychiatry in Bolzano were surveyed using an online questionnaire. In addition, from January to March 2023, the general population of South Tyrol was invited to take part in the survey through an online-link and was divided into three groups: 267 persons with mental health problems, 855 relatives and 1,019 persons with no direct or indirect contact to people with mental problems. The validated Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS) was used together with questions on the emotional reactions to the parricide and the perceived dangerousness of psychiatric patients. Descriptive statistics, one-way Anovas as well as regressions were carried out.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All groups experienced sadness the most. Relatives experienced more sadness and anger than the other groups. Over 80% of the professionals stated that psychiatric patients were not at greater risk of committing parricide. The population with no contact rated the risk higher than those affected and had the lowest level of openness (RIBS). There were no differences between genders, but there were age differences, with younger people being more stigmatizing. The results suggest that personal contact, appropriate information, and education are associated with less stigmatization.

摘要

简介

本研究是在 2021 年 1 月意大利博尔扎诺(南蒂罗尔)发生弑亲事件的背景下进行的。迄今为止,弑亲事件对普通民众和心理健康专业人员的心理影响几乎没有得到调查。关于污名化的研究表明,不同群体之间存在差异。本研究旨在分析南蒂罗尔民众对弑亲事件的情绪反应和对精神障碍患者的污名化。

方法

2022 年 9 月,对博尔扎诺精神病学系的 121 名心理健康专业人员进行了在线问卷调查。此外,2023 年 1 月至 3 月,通过在线链接邀请南蒂罗尔的普通民众参与调查,并将其分为三组:267 名有心理健康问题的人、855 名亲属和 1019 名与精神问题患者没有直接或间接接触的人。使用经过验证的报告和意图行为量表(RIBS)以及对弑亲事件的情绪反应和对精神病人危险性的感知问题进行调查。进行了描述性统计、单因素方差分析和回归分析。

结果和讨论

所有组别的人最感到悲伤。亲属比其他组别的人感到更多的悲伤和愤怒。超过 80%的专业人员表示,精神病人没有更高的自杀风险。没有接触过精神病人的人群认为精神病人的风险更高,且开放性程度(RIBS)最低。性别之间没有差异,但存在年龄差异,年轻人的污名化程度更高。结果表明,个人接触、适当的信息和教育与较少的污名化有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/82490229097f/fpubh-12-1388842-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/95ce6c2d703d/fpubh-12-1388842-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/64b156da2220/fpubh-12-1388842-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/82490229097f/fpubh-12-1388842-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/95ce6c2d703d/fpubh-12-1388842-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/64b156da2220/fpubh-12-1388842-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/11247646/82490229097f/fpubh-12-1388842-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotional reactions and stigmatization after a parricide in South Tyrol, Italy, among mental health professionals and the general population, including persons with mental disorders, relatives, and persons with no direct or indirect contact.意大利南蒂罗尔地区发生杀亲案件后,心理健康专业人员和普通民众(包括精神障碍患者、亲属以及无直接或间接接触者)的情绪反应和污名化。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;12:1388842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388842. eCollection 2024.
2
Personality, self-esteem, familiarity, and mental health stigmatization: a cross-sectional vignette-based study.人格、自尊、熟悉度与心理健康污名化:一项基于横断虚拟情景的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14017-z.
3
More Optimistic Recovery Attitudes Are Associated with Less Stigmatization of People with Mental Illness among Healthcare Professionals Working on Acute and Semi-Acute Psychiatric Wards.在急性和半急性精神科病房工作的医护人员中,更乐观的康复态度与对精神疾病患者的污名化程度较低有关。
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Sep;90(3):481-489. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09642-3.
4
Differential stigmatizing attitudes of healthcare professionals towards psychiatry and patients with mental health problems: something to worry about? A pilot study.医疗保健专业人员对精神病学和有心理健康问题患者的歧视性态度差异:值得担忧吗?一项试点研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;50(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0931-z. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
5
Development and evaluation of e-mental health interventions to reduce stigmatization of suicidality - a study protocol.电子心理健康干预措施的制定与评估以减少对自杀意念的污名化——研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 May 17;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2137-0.
6
[Perception of stigmatization in people with psoriasis-qualitative analysis from the perspective of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals].[银屑病患者对污名化的认知——基于患者、亲属和医护人员视角的定性分析]
Hautarzt. 2019 Jul;70(7):520-526. doi: 10.1007/s00105-019-4411-y.
7
Crazy'App: A web survey on representations and attitudes toward mental disorders using video testimonies.疯狂 APP:一项使用视频证言调查人们对精神障碍的看法和态度的网络调查。
Encephale. 2019 Sep;45(4):290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
8
[Stigmatisation of patients with mental disorders by medical interns specialising in general practice: A national survey].[全科医学专业实习医生对精神障碍患者的污名化:一项全国性调查]
Encephale. 2023 Feb;49(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Medical student attitudes about mental illness: does medical-school education reduce stigma?医学生对精神疾病的态度:医学院教育是否能减少污名化?
Acad Psychiatry. 2012 May 1;36(3):197-204. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.10110159.
10
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies to Reduce Mental Illness Stigma: Perspectives of People with Lived Experience and Caregivers.减少精神疾病污名化的策略:有过患病经历者和护理人员的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031632.
2
Trends in Public Stigma of Mental Illness in the US, 1996-2018.美国公众对精神疾病污名化的趋势,1996-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140202. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40202.
3
Aggressive Behavior and Psychiatric Inpatients: a Narrative Review of the Literature with a Focus on the European Experience.
攻击性行为与精神科住院患者:文献回顾的叙述性研究,重点关注欧洲经验。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Apr 7;23(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01233-z.
4
Stigma toward mental and physical illness: attitudes of healthcare professionals, healthcare students and the general public in Pakistan.对精神疾病和身体疾病的污名化:巴基斯坦医疗保健专业人员、医学生和普通公众的态度。
BJPsych Open. 2020 Aug 3;6(5):e81. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.66.
5
The typology of parricide and the role of mental illness: Data-driven approach.杀亲行为的类型学与精神疾病的作用:数据驱动方法。
Aggress Behav. 2020 Nov;46(6):516-522. doi: 10.1002/ab.21906. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
Mental Health Stigma: The Impact of Age and Gender on Attitudes.心理健康污名:年龄和性别对态度的影响
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Jul;56(5):933-938. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00559-x. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
A systematic review of the impact of media reports of severe mental illness on stigma and discrimination, and interventions that aim to mitigate any adverse impact.一项关于媒体报道严重精神疾病对污名化和歧视影响的系统评价,以及旨在减轻任何不良影响的干预措施。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;54(1):11-31. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1608-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Psychiatric symptoms and risk of victimisation: a population-based study from Southeast London.精神症状与受害风险:来自伦敦东南部的一项基于人群的研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr;28(2):168-178. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000537. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
9
Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation.使用社交媒体衡量心理健康态度:调查污名化和轻视现象。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;54(1):51-58. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1571-5. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
10
Risk of Being Subjected to Crime, Including Violent Crime, After Onset of Mental Illness: A Danish National Registry Study Using Police Data.精神疾病发病后遭受犯罪(包括暴力犯罪)的风险:一项基于丹麦全国登记系统的警方数据研究
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):689-696. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0534.