NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre; Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, REAL, CCAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Grupo Luz Saúde, Lisbon, Portugal.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Sep 3;79(9):2281-2291. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae226.
Antimicrobial resistance is driven by inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing. The National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) is an Australian-developed auditing platform to assist in the assessments of antimicrobial quality by antimicrobial stewardship programmes using consensus-based definitions. The NAPS has demonstrated to be transferable to other countries. Its adaptation to Portugal could improve knowledge about the quality of antimicrobial prescribing in the country.
To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Australian Hospital NAPS appropriateness assessment definitions of antimicrobial prescribing for Portugal.
International recommendations on translation and adaptation of instruments were followed. Two panels of experts participated in the process, using Zoom® for discussions and interviews, and Google Forms® for assessing vignettes. A native English-speaking person proficient in Portuguese conducted the back-translation. SPSS v.28 and Excel® were used for validity calculation.
The Portuguese version was well accepted, its implementation being perceived as desirable and feasible by the experts. Validation process showed a Fleiss' κ score of 0.483 (95% CI, 0.415-0.551, P < 0.005) for appropriateness, and an average agreement with the Australian NAPS team of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, for appropriateness and reasons for inappropriateness.
The Portuguese version of the Australian Hospital NAPS appropriateness assessment definitions of antimicrobial prescribing, the first to be translated from English, was deemed non-inferior to the original, was well accepted, considered to be desirable and feasible, and could inspire other countries, particularly other Portuguese-speaking countries, to adapt and validate them in their own contexts, reinforcing the possibility of transferring NAPS use beyond Australia.
抗菌药物的不合理使用是导致抗菌药物耐药性产生的主要原因。澳大利亚开发的抗菌药物处方审核平台——国家抗菌药物处方调查(NAPS),可协助抗菌药物管理项目采用基于共识的定义对抗菌药物质量进行评估。该调查已被证明可在其他国家应用。将其应用于葡萄牙,可以提高对该国抗菌药物处方质量的认识。
将澳大利亚医院 NAPS 适宜性评估定义翻译成葡萄牙语并进行文化调适,以评估葡萄牙的抗菌药物处方适宜性。
遵循国际上有关工具翻译和调适的建议。两个专家小组通过 Zoom®进行讨论和访谈,使用 Google Forms®评估情景模拟案例,参与了这一过程。一名精通英语和葡萄牙语的母语为英语的人员进行了回译。使用 SPSS v.28 和 Excel®进行了有效性计算。
葡萄牙语版本得到了专家的认可,他们认为实施该版本是可取且可行的。验证过程显示,适宜性的 Fleiss' κ 评分为 0.483(95%CI,0.415-0.551,P<0.005),与澳大利亚 NAPS 团队的平均一致性分别为 0.8 和 0.9,用于评估适宜性和不适当的原因。
澳大利亚医院 NAPS 适宜性评估定义的葡萄牙语版本是从英语翻译而来的第一个版本,被认为与原文等效,得到了专家的认可,被认为是可取且可行的,并可能激发其他国家,特别是其他葡萄牙语国家,在自己的环境中对其进行调适和验证,从而加强了在澳大利亚以外地区应用 NAPS 的可能性。