University Health Network, 101 College St., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada.
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2, Canada.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jan 1;73(1):246-249. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx341.
Antimicrobial prescribing is frequently reported as appropriate or inappropriate, particularly in the ICU. However, the definitions used are non-standardized and lack validity and reliability.
To develop standardized definitions of appropriateness for antimicrobial prescribing in the critical care setting.
We used consensus-based modified Delphi and RAND appropriateness methodology to develop criteria to define appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing. A multiphased approach with an online questionnaire followed by a facilitated in-person meeting was utilized and included clinicians from a variety of practice areas (e.g. surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, intensivists, transplant specialists and pharmacists).
There were a total of 23 criteria agreed upon to define the following categories of antimicrobial prescribing: appropriate; effective but unnecessary; inappropriate; and under-treatment.
These standardized criteria for appropriateness may be generalizable to other patient populations and utilized with other tools to adjudicate prescribing practices.
抗菌药物的使用通常被报告为适当或不适当,尤其是在 ICU 中。然而,所使用的定义是非标准化的,缺乏有效性和可靠性。
制定标准化的重症监护环境下抗菌药物使用适当性的定义。
我们使用基于共识的改良 Delphi 和 RAND 适当性方法制定了定义抗菌药物使用适当性的标准。采用多阶段方法,首先进行在线问卷调查,然后再进行面对面会议,参与者来自各种临床科室(如外科医生、传染病专家、重症监护专家、移植专家和药剂师)。
共达成 23 项标准,用于定义以下抗菌药物使用类别:适当、有效但不必要、不适当和治疗不足。
这些标准化的适当性标准可能适用于其他患者人群,并与其他工具一起用于判断处方实践。