Suppr超能文献

合肥市大学生献血者的流行病学分析

Epidemiological analysis of blood donors from college students in Hefei city.

作者信息

Sun Qian Qian, Bian Mao Hong

机构信息

Department of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Anhui blood center Hefei Central Blood Station, Hefei, China.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14087. doi: 10.1111/jep.14087. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

RATIONALE

College students represent a unique demographic group as they are adults no longer under direct parental care, yet often lack the institutional health support available to more established members of society, which can lead to their health needs being neglected, despite their substantial contributions to blood donation. The objective of this study is to shed light on the health status of college students in Hefei, with a specific focus on transfusion-transmitted diseases. Based on the detailed data analysis, the implementation of some constructive strategies will play a good warning role in improving clinical blood safety and promoting better health monitoring of this population in the future.

AIMS & OBJECTIVES: The study aims to achieve two main objectives: On the one hand, to deepen our understanding of college students' participation in blood donation activities. On the other hand, to propose effective strategies for increasing youth involvement. Additionally, such research aims to afford recommendations for ensuring the safety of clinical blood supplies. Although the strategies and suggestions presented are speculative, they are grounded in the logical analysis of data and relevant theoretical frameworks. Therefore, these recommendations serve as a basis for potential future testing and implementation.

METHOD

The evaluation process for blood samples at the Hefei Blood Bank involves thorough serological testing for hepatitis B and C, HIV, and Treponema pallidum using both Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT). HIV reactive samples were further confirmed using Western Blot techniques at an external specialized laboratory. To ensure accuracy, each sample was tested with reagents from two different manufacturers. Moreover, any initially reactive sample was retested with the same reagent to eliminate potential false positives. In cases of conflicting results, alternative reagent kits are utilized for further confirmatory tests. Only samples that consistently show reactive results in consecutive tests are considered positive confirmation samples.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Upon analysis of the data set, it was found that out of the total 663,105 donors, 177,089 (26.7%) were identified as college students, with the remaining 486,016 categorized as noncollege students. Our study demonstrated a notably lower prevalence of blood-transmitted infections among college students (0.48%) in contrast to the wider donor population (1.23%), underscoring their potential as safe blood donors. To uphold this level of safety and protect public health, it is crucial to increase disease prevention awareness and advocate for responsible donation practices within this specific demographic. Strengthening confidentiality protocols and expanding education on safe sexual behaviors in university settings are vital actions to cultivate an environment that promotes informed and secure blood donation.

IN TERMS OF SPECIFIC INFECTIONS

The overall group had prevalence rates of 0.44% for hepatitis B, 0.15% for hepatitis C, 0.02% for HIV, and 0.42% for Treponema pallidum. When focusing on the student cohort, the prevalence rates were 0.17% for hepatitis B, 0.04% for hepatitis C, 0.02% for HIV, and 0.23% for Treponema pallidum. Transmissibility through blood transfusion All donors (%) Students (%) Non-students (%) Any infection 1.23 0.48 1.51 HbsAg 0.44 0.17 0.54 Anti-HCV 0.15 0.04 0.19 HIV Ag/Ab 0.02 0.02 0.02 Anti-TP 0.42 0.23 0.49 Individuals with two or more infectious agents occur more than once in all categories. While it leads to numerical over-representation, such overlap is minimal and statistically insignificant.

摘要

理论依据

大学生是一个独特的人口群体,他们已成年,不再受到父母的直接照料,但往往缺乏社会中更成熟成员所享有的机构健康支持,这可能导致他们的健康需求被忽视,尽管他们对献血做出了重大贡献。本研究的目的是阐明合肥大学生的健康状况,特别关注输血传播疾病。基于详细的数据分析,实施一些建设性策略将对改善临床用血安全以及未来促进对该人群更好的健康监测起到良好的警示作用。

目的

本研究旨在实现两个主要目标:一方面,加深我们对大学生参与献血活动的理解。另一方面,提出增加年轻人参与度的有效策略。此外,此类研究旨在为确保临床用血供应安全提供建议。尽管所提出的策略和建议具有推测性,但它们基于数据的逻辑分析和相关理论框架。因此,这些建议为未来可能的测试和实施奠定了基础。

方法

合肥血站对血样的评估过程包括使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和核酸检测(NAT)对乙型和丙型肝炎、艾滋病毒和梅毒螺旋体进行全面的血清学检测。艾滋病毒反应性样本在外部专业实验室使用蛋白质印迹技术进一步确认。为确保准确性,每个样本使用来自两个不同制造商的试剂进行检测。此外,任何最初反应性的样本都用相同的试剂重新检测以消除潜在的假阳性。在结果冲突的情况下,使用替代试剂盒进行进一步的确认测试。只有在连续测试中始终显示反应性结果的样本才被视为阳性确认样本。

结果与结论

通过对数据集的分析发现,在总共663,105名献血者中,有177,089名(26.7%)被确定为大学生,其余486,016名被归类为非大学生。我们的研究表明,与更广泛的献血人群(1.23%)相比,大学生中血液传播感染的患病率显著较低(0.48%),突出了他们作为安全献血者的潜力。为维持这种安全水平并保护公众健康,至关重要的是提高疾病预防意识,并在这一特定人群中倡导负责任的献血行为。加强保密协议以及在大学环境中扩大对安全性行为的教育是营造促进知情和安全献血环境的重要行动。

关于特定感染

总体人群中乙型肝炎患病率为0.44%,丙型肝炎为0.15%,艾滋病毒为0.02%,梅毒螺旋体为0.42%。聚焦学生群体时,乙型肝炎患病率为0.17%,丙型肝炎为0.04%,艾滋病毒为0.02%,梅毒螺旋体为0.23%。

输血传播率

所有献血者(%) 学生(%) 非学生(%)

任何感染 1.23 0.48 1.51

乙肝表面抗原 0.44 0.17 0.54

抗丙肝病毒 0.15 0.04 0.19

艾滋病毒抗原/抗体 0.02 0.02 0.02

抗梅毒螺旋体 0.42 0.23 0.49

有两种或更多种感染因子的个体在所有类别中不止出现一次。虽然这导致数字上的过度代表,但这种重叠最小且在统计学上不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验