Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences.
Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 1;210(11):1358-1369. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0165OC.
Optimizing pyrazinamide dosing is critical to improve treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity during tuberculosis treatment. Study 31/AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5349 represents the largest phase 3 randomized controlled therapeutic trial to date for such an investigation. We sought to report pyrazinamide pharmacokinetic parameters, risk factors for lower pyrazinamide exposure, and relationships between pyrazinamide exposure and efficacy and safety outcomes. We aimed to determine pyrazinamide dosing strategies that optimize risks and benefits. We analyzed pyrazinamide steady-state pharmacokinetic data using population nonlinear mixed-effects models. We evaluated the contribution of pyrazinamide exposure to long-term efficacy using parametric time-to-event models and safety outcomes using logistic regression. We evaluated optimal dosing with therapeutic windows targeting ≥95% durable cure and safety within the observed proportion of the primary safety outcome. Among 2,255 participants with 6,978 plasma samples, pyrazinamide displayed sevenfold exposure variability (151-1,053 mg·h/L). Body weight was not a clinically relevant predictor of drug clearance and thus did not justify the need for weight-banded dosing. Both clinical and safety outcomes were associated with pyrazinamide exposure, resulting in therapeutic windows of 231-355 mg · h/L for the control and 226-349 mg·h/L for the rifapentine-moxifloxacin regimen. Flat dosing of pyrazinamide at 1,000 mg would have permitted an additional 13.1% ( = 96) of participants allocated to the control and 9.2% ( = 70) to the rifapentine-moxifloxacin regimen dosed within the therapeutic window, compared with the current weight-banded dosing. Flat dosing of pyrazinamide at 1,000 mg/d would be readily implementable and could optimize treatment outcomes in drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02410772).
优化吡嗪酰胺剂量对于提高结核病治疗的疗效、降低毒性至关重要。研究 31/艾滋病临床试验组 A5349 是迄今为止此类研究中规模最大的 3 期随机对照治疗试验。我们旨在报告吡嗪酰胺药代动力学参数、吡嗪酰胺暴露量较低的风险因素,以及吡嗪酰胺暴露量与疗效和安全性结果之间的关系。我们旨在确定优化风险和收益的吡嗪酰胺给药策略。我们使用群体非线性混合效应模型分析吡嗪酰胺稳态药代动力学数据。我们使用参数时间事件模型评估吡嗪酰胺暴露对长期疗效的贡献,使用逻辑回归评估安全性结果。我们通过针对≥95%持久治愈率和观察到的主要安全性结果的比例内安全性的治疗窗来评估最佳给药剂量。在 2255 名参与者中,有 6978 个血浆样本,吡嗪酰胺的暴露量存在 7 倍的变异性(151-1053 mg·h/L)。体重不是药物清除率的临床相关预测因子,因此没有理由需要按体重分组给药。临床和安全性结果都与吡嗪酰胺的暴露有关,导致控制组的治疗窗为 231-355 mg·h/L,利福平-莫西沙星组为 226-349 mg·h/L。与当前的按体重分组给药相比,吡嗪酰胺的 1000mg 固定剂量可使更多的 13.1%(=96)分配到对照组和 9.2%(=70)分配到利福平-莫西沙星组的患者的剂量处于治疗窗内。与当前的按体重分组给药相比,每天 1000mg 固定剂量的吡嗪酰胺给药更容易实施,并可优化耐多药结核病的治疗效果。临床试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT02410772)。