• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活变得更好,但并非没有挑战:社区心理健康康复出院后的经历——一项质性内容分析

Life is better but not without challenges: experiences following discharge from community-based residential mental health rehabilitation-a qualitative content analysis.

作者信息

Parker Stephen, Chapman Maddison, Wyder Marianne, Pommeranz Matthew, Walgers Rebecca, Dark Frances, Meurk Carla

机构信息

Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;60(1):95-111. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02716-z. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-024-02716-z
PMID:39012385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11790724/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Community-based residential mental health rehabilitation units for people experiencing severe and persistent mental illness are increasingly available in Australia. Research completed 20 years ago suggested that people leaving these services often experienced impoverished social lives and other challenges in the community. It is unclear whether contemporary consumers experience similar difficulties. This qualitative study explored contemporary consumers' experiences after leaving community-based residential services.

METHODS

An inductive qualitative content analysis of individual interviews was completed with consumers 12-18 months following discharge from three community care units (CCUs) in Queensland, Australia. The interview schedule explored three questions: (1) What does life look like after leaving the CCU, (2) Has the CCU impacted their life, and (3) How could the CCU experience be improved? A convenience sample was used, with sampling continuing until thematic saturation was achieved. A member of the research team who had relevant lived experience actively supported the analysis and interpretation.

RESULTS

Seventeen interviews were completed. Three themes were identified: 'life is better but not without challenges', 'the CCU helps you get ready to go out into the world', and 'strict rules are important but rigid expectations can be hard; things could be better'.

CONCLUSION

Consumers reflected positively on their lives post-discharge from a community-based residential rehabilitation unit and viewed the service as having supported improvements in their lives. The findings suggest the appropriateness of optimism about the possibility of sustained improvements in quality of life after leaving community-based transitional residential rehabilitation support.

摘要

目的

在澳大利亚,为患有严重和持续性精神疾病的人提供的社区寄宿式心理健康康复机构越来越多。20年前完成的研究表明,离开这些服务机构的人在社区中往往经历着贫困的社交生活和其他挑战。目前尚不清楚当代的服务对象是否也会遇到类似的困难。这项定性研究探讨了当代服务对象离开社区寄宿式服务后的经历。

方法

对澳大利亚昆士兰州三个社区护理单元(CCU)出院12至18个月后的服务对象进行了个人访谈,并完成了归纳性定性内容分析。访谈提纲探讨了三个问题:(1)离开CCU后的生活是怎样的,(2)CCU是否对他们的生活产生了影响,以及(3)如何改善在CCU的体验?采用了便利抽样法,抽样持续进行直至达到主题饱和。一名具有相关生活经历的研究团队成员积极支持分析和解读工作。

结果

完成了17次访谈。确定了三个主题:“生活有所改善但并非没有挑战”、“CCU帮助你为融入社会做好准备”以及“严格的规定很重要,但刻板的期望可能难以承受;情况可以变得更好”。

结论

服务对象对从社区寄宿式康复机构出院后的生活给予了积极评价,并认为该服务有助于改善他们的生活。研究结果表明,对于离开社区过渡性寄宿康复支持后生活质量持续改善的可能性持乐观态度是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7533/11790724/31da83125a7e/127_2024_2716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7533/11790724/31da83125a7e/127_2024_2716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7533/11790724/31da83125a7e/127_2024_2716_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Life is better but not without challenges: experiences following discharge from community-based residential mental health rehabilitation-a qualitative content analysis.生活变得更好,但并非没有挑战:社区心理健康康复出院后的经历——一项质性内容分析
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;60(1):95-111. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02716-z. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Community-care unit model of residential mental health rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia: predicting outcomes of consumers 1-year post discharge.澳大利亚昆士兰州社区关怀单位模式下的住院精神健康康复服务:预测出院后 1 年消费者的结果。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Mar 11;29:e109. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000207.
3
Understanding consumers' initial expectations of community-based residential mental health rehabilitation in the context of past experiences of care: A mixed-methods pragmatic grounded theory analysis.理解消费者在过去护理经历背景下对社区居住型精神健康康复的初始期望:混合方法实用扎根理论分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Dec;27(6):1650-1660. doi: 10.1111/inm.12461. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
A systematic review of service models and evidence relating to the clinically operated community-based residential mental health rehabilitation for adults with severe and persisting mental illness in Australia.澳大利亚针对严重和持续性精神疾病成人的基于社区的临床运作的精神卫生康复服务模式及相关临床证据的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2019-5.
5
Consumers' understanding and expectations of a community-based recovery-oriented mental health rehabilitation unit: a pragmatic grounded theory analysis.消费者对基于社区的以康复为导向的精神卫生康复单位的理解和期望:实用扎根理论分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):408-417. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000749. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Comparing clinical and demographic characteristics of people with mental illness in hospital- and community-based residential rehabilitation units in Queensland.比较昆士兰州医院和社区寄宿康复机构中患有精神疾病者的临床和人口统计学特征。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 May;41(2):139-143. doi: 10.1071/AH15207.
7
The association between discontinuation of community treatment orders and outcomes in the 12-months following discharge from residential mental health rehabilitation.社区治疗令中止与出院后 12 个月内精神卫生康复机构中结局的相关性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Jan-Feb;74:101664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101664. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Consumer experiences of community-based residential mental health rehabilitation for severe and persistent mental illness: A pragmatic grounded theory analysis.基于社区的严重和持续性精神疾病康复的消费者体验:实用扎根理论分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):733-746. doi: 10.1111/inm.12842. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Examining the outcomes of the first one hundred residents in a community based residential rehabilitation unit for people affected by severe and persistent mental illness.对一家为患有严重和持续性精神疾病的人设立的社区住宅康复机构中的首批一百名居民的治疗效果进行调查。
Australas Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;31(2):213-219. doi: 10.1177/10398562231157599. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Longitudinal comparative evaluation of the equivalence of an integrated peer-support and clinical staffing model for residential mental health rehabilitation: a mixed methods protocol incorporating multiple stakeholder perspectives.住院精神卫生康复综合同伴支持与临床人员配备模式等效性的纵向比较评估:一项纳入多利益相关方观点的混合方法方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 2;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0882-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Engagement in Community-based Residential Mental Health Rehabilitation: Modelling of a cross-sectional Statewide Benchmarking Dataset from Queensland, Australia.社区居住式心理健康康复参与度的预测因素:来自澳大利亚昆士兰州的全州横断面基准数据集建模
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01512-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Functioning, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life of individuals with severe mental disorders after psychiatric rehabilitation.精神康复后严重精神障碍个体的功能、精神症状和生活质量。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;78(1):54-63. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2023.2262448. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
2
Independent Supported Housing Versus Institutionalised Residential Rehabilitation for Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Survey of Attitudes and Working Conditions Among Mental Healthcare Professionals.独立支持性住房与机构化住宅康复治疗对严重精神疾病患者的比较:精神卫生保健专业人员态度和工作条件调查。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Apr;59(3):531-539. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01037-2. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Integrated Peer Support and Clinical Staffing Models for Community-Based Residential Mental Health Rehabilitation: A Prospective Observational Study.
基于社区的精神卫生康复中综合同伴支持和临床人员配备模式的比较效果:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Apr;59(3):459-470. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01023-8. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
Effectiveness of supported housing versus residential care in severe mental illness: a multicenter, quasi-experimental study.支持性住房与住院治疗在严重精神疾病中的疗效比较:一项多中心、准实验研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 May;57(5):927-937. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02214-6. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
5
Structured Evaluation of Rehabilitation Programs Outcomes in Psychiatry: Application of a Recovery-Centered Model.精神科康复项目结果的结构化评估:以康复为中心模式的应用。
Psychiatr Q. 2021 Dec;92(4):1513-1530. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09884-0. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Consumer experiences of community-based residential mental health rehabilitation for severe and persistent mental illness: A pragmatic grounded theory analysis.基于社区的严重和持续性精神疾病康复的消费者体验:实用扎根理论分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):733-746. doi: 10.1111/inm.12842. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Effectiveness of permanent supportive housing and income assistance interventions for homeless individuals in high-income countries: a systematic review.高收入国家针对无家可归者的永久性支持性住房和收入援助干预措施的效果:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):e342-e360. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30055-4.
8
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
9
Research into mental health supported accommodation - desperately needed but challenging to deliver.对心理健康支持性住所的研究——迫切需要但实施起来具有挑战性。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;218(4):179-181. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.74.
10
Community-care unit model of residential mental health rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia: predicting outcomes of consumers 1-year post discharge.澳大利亚昆士兰州社区关怀单位模式下的住院精神健康康复服务:预测出院后 1 年消费者的结果。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Mar 11;29:e109. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000207.