• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区参与乌干达东部布达达区消灭盘尾丝虫病后监测:一项横断面研究。

Community Involvement in Onchocerciasis Post-elimination Surveillance in Bududa District, Eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.

The Carter Center, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jul 16;18(7):e0012270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012270. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012270
PMID:39012847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, there are an estimated 20.9 million cases of onchocerciasis, with Africa bearing the greatest burden. The World Health Organization (WHO) has targeted the disease for elimination by 2030. As of August 2023, there were 15 foci in 37/48 (76%) districts and one city in Uganda that had reached the elimination phase. However, there is a paucity of data on community involvement in post-elimination surveillance (PES) activities. The communities in the post-elimination phase are expected to maintain surveillance, provide health education, refer cases for treatment, and participate in surveillance. However, it is not clear whether this is being done. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of community involvement in post-elimination surveillance activities in Bududa District, Eastern Uganda, to draw key generalisable lessons for similar settings.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study employing rigorous mixed methods of data collection. We used a semi-structured questionnaire to collect quantitative data on randomly sampled study participants in two sub-countries in the district. Community involvement in post-elimination surveillance (PES) was our dependent variable, measured using Yes or No questions, and our independent variables were measured on different scales. Computations of proportions and associations were done using Stata 15 software. Conversely, qualitative data were collected via focus group discussions (FGDs) for community participants and key informant interviews (KIIs) for local leaders. For the qualitative component, we had 2 FGDs, each consisting of 8 gender-balanced participants per group and 8 KIIs. Qualitative data analyses were done using a robust thematic framework approach, ensuring the reliability and validity of our findings.

RESULTS

A total of 422 participants with a mean age of 51.4 years (SD = 15.8) participated in the study. Community involvement in post-elimination surveillance was low (14%). Factors associated with involvements were district support [Adjusted odd ratio AOR 14, 95 CI = (2.5, 81.7)], seeing black flies in the environment in a week preceding the survey [AOR 8, 95% CI = (1.5, 42.5)], in one month [AOR 3.8, 95% CI = (1.1, 13.2)], and being a community volunteer in the Ivermectin treatment program [AOR 4.3, 95% CI = (1.03, 17.9)]. Lack of funding, poor motivation, poor program sustainability planning, and a lack of drugs at health facilities were key challenges affecting community involvement in post-elimination surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Community involvement in onchocerciasis post-elimination surveillance activities in Bududa District in Eastern Uganda was low but could be improved by increased district support, funding, community motivation and sensitisation.

摘要

背景

全球估计有 2090 万例盘尾丝虫病病例,其中非洲负担最重。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)已将该病作为 2030 年消除的目标。截至 2023 年 8 月,乌干达已有 15 个病灶,涉及 37/48 个区(76%)和一个城市已进入消除阶段。然而,关于社区参与消除后监测(PES)活动的数据很少。预计社区在消除后阶段将继续进行监测、提供健康教育、转诊治疗病例并参与监测。但是,尚不清楚是否正在这样做。在这项研究中,我们评估了在乌干达东部布杜达区社区参与消除后监测活动的可行性,以总结出在类似环境下的关键经验教训。

方法

这是一项采用严格的混合方法收集数据的横断面研究。我们使用半结构式问卷,对该地区两个分区的随机抽样研究参与者收集定量数据。社区参与消除后监测(PES)是我们的因变量,使用是或否问题进行衡量,我们的自变量则以不同的尺度进行衡量。使用 Stata 15 软件计算比例和关联。相反,定性数据是通过社区参与者的焦点小组讨论(FGD)和当地领导人的关键信息访谈(KII)收集的。对于定性部分,我们进行了 2 次 FGD,每个小组由 8 名性别平衡的参与者组成,进行了 8 次 KII。使用稳健的主题框架方法进行定性数据分析,以确保研究结果的可靠性和有效性。

结果

共有 422 名参与者,平均年龄为 51.4 岁(SD=15.8)。社区参与消除后监测的比例较低(14%)。与参与有关的因素包括地区支持[调整后的优势比(AOR)14,95%置信区间(CI)=(2.5,81.7)]、调查前一周在环境中看到黑蝇[AOR 8,95%CI=(1.5,42.5)]、一个月内[AOR 3.8,95%CI=(1.1,13.2)]和作为伊维菌素治疗计划的社区志愿者[AOR 4.3,95%CI=(1.03,17.9)]。缺乏资金、动机不足、方案可持续性规划不善以及卫生设施缺乏药物是影响社区参与消除后监测的主要挑战。

结论

在乌干达东部布杜达区,社区参与盘尾丝虫病消除后监测活动的比例较低,但可以通过增加地区支持、资金、社区激励和宣传来提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2e/11251607/2ad7a1de7556/pntd.0012270.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2e/11251607/2ad7a1de7556/pntd.0012270.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2e/11251607/2ad7a1de7556/pntd.0012270.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Community Involvement in Onchocerciasis Post-elimination Surveillance in Bududa District, Eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study.社区参与乌干达东部布达达区消灭盘尾丝虫病后监测:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jul 16;18(7):e0012270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012270. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
"Cross-border collaboration in onchocerciasis elimination in Uganda: progress, challenges and opportunities from 2008 to 2013".“乌干达盘尾丝虫病消除工作中的跨境合作:2008 至 2013 年的进展、挑战与机遇”。
Global Health. 2018 Feb 6;14(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0333-1.
3
Impact of ivermectin mass drug administration on burden of soil-transmitted helminths in onchocerciasis control and elimination programs, Yeki district, southwest Ethiopia.在依维菌素大规模药物治疗对控制和消除盘尾丝虫病规划中土壤传播性蠕虫负担的影响,埃塞俄比亚西南部耶基地区。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0263625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263625. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of mass treatment with ivermectin program reach and survey coverage for onchocerciasis elimination in selected endemic areas of Ethiopia.评估在埃塞俄比亚部分流行区开展伊维菌素群体治疗项目的覆盖范围和调查覆盖面,以实现消灭盘尾丝虫病目标。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271518. eCollection 2022.
5
The selection and validation of indicators for monitoring progress towards self-sustainment in community-directed, ivermectin-treatment programmes for onchocerciasis control in Uganda.乌干达盘尾丝虫病控制项目中,社区导向的伊维菌素治疗方案实现自给自足进展监测指标的选择与验证
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998 Dec;92(8):859-68. doi: 10.1080/00034989858907.
6
Land slide disaster in eastern Uganda: rapid assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene situation in Bulucheke camp, Bududa district.乌干达东部滑坡灾害:布杜达区布卢切克营地的水、环境卫生和个人卫生状况快速评估。
Environ Health. 2011 May 14;10:38. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-38.
7
Important progress towards elimination of onchocerciasis in the West Region of Cameroon.喀麦隆西部地区在消除盘尾丝虫病方面取得重要进展。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Aug 3;10(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2301-7.
8
Understanding the delay in identifying Sudan Virus Disease: gaps in integrated disease surveillance and response and community-based surveillance to detect viral hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in Uganda, September 2022.了解苏丹病毒病的确诊延迟:乌干达综合疾病监测和应对以及基于社区的监测在发现病毒性出血热疫情方面存在的差距,2022 年 9 月。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09659-5.
9
The challenge of establishing community-directed treatment with Mectizan in Uganda.在乌干达采用美迪善开展社区导向治疗面临的挑战。
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998 Apr;92 Suppl 1:S171-4. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1998.11813388.
10
Progress towards the elimination of onchocerciasis as a public-health problem in Uganda: opportunities, challenges and the way forward.乌干达在将盘尾丝虫病作为公共卫生问题予以消除方面取得的进展:机遇、挑战与前进方向。
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2007 Jun;101(4):323-33. doi: 10.1179/136485907X176355.

本文引用的文献

1
Black flies and Onchocerciasis: Knowledge, attitude and practices among inhabitants of Alabameta, Osun State, Southwestern, Nigeria.黑蝇与盘尾丝虫病:尼日利亚西南部奥孙州阿拉巴梅塔居民的知识、态度和实践。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Apr 21;16(4):e0010320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010320. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Achieving malaria elimination in China.在中国实现消除疟疾目标。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Dec;6(12):e871-e872. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00201-2.
3
Risk Factors for Nodding Syndrome and Other Forms of Epilepsy in Northern Uganda: A Case-Control Study.
乌干达北部点头综合征及其他癫痫形式的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Pathogens. 2021 Nov 9;10(11):1451. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10111451.
4
Onchocerciasis Elimination: Progress and Challenges.盘尾丝虫病消除:进展与挑战
Res Rep Trop Med. 2020 Oct 7;11:81-95. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S224364. eCollection 2020.
5
Onchocerciasis (river blindness) - more than a century of research and control.盘尾丝虫病(河盲症)——一个多世纪的研究和防治。
Acta Trop. 2021 Jun;218:105677. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105677. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Historical Elimination of Onchocerciasis from Victoria Nile Focus in Central Uganda Verified Using WHO Criteria.乌干达维多利亚尼罗重点地区基于世界卫生组织标准的盘尾丝虫病消除史。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jun;102(6):1411-1416. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0064.
7
Reaching the last mile: main challenges relating to and recommendations to accelerate onchocerciasis elimination in Africa.到达最后一英里:与加速非洲消灭盘尾丝虫病相关的主要挑战和建议。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2019 Jul 4;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40249-019-0567-z.
8
After 70 years of fighting an age-old scourge, onchocerciasis in Uganda, the end is in sight.在与这一古老祸害进行了70年的斗争之后,乌干达的盘尾丝虫病终于有望终结。
Int Health. 2018 Mar 1;10(suppl_1):i79-i88. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihx044.
9
Review of the factors influencing the motivation of community drug distributors towards the control and elimination of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs).影响社区药物分发人员控制和消除被忽视热带病(NTDs)动机因素的综述。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Dec 6;11(12):e0006065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006065. eCollection 2017 Dec.
10
Interruption of the transmission of Onchocerca volvulus in the Kashoya-Kitomi focus, western Uganda by long-term ivermectin treatment and elimination of the vector Simulium neavei by larviciding.通过长期伊维菌素治疗以及采用杀幼虫剂消灭传播媒介纳氏蚋,阻断乌干达西部卡绍亚-基托米疫源地盘尾丝虫的传播。
Acta Trop. 2017 Mar;167:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.12.029. Epub 2016 Dec 26.