Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Michigan Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307002. eCollection 2024.
Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) accounts for or contributes to dyspnea in a noteworthy proportion of treatment seeking populations including those misdiagnosed with asthma. Despite increasing awareness of the disorder, literature exploring patient experience is limited. The aim of this work is to report patient perspectives on ILO and the way in which it impacts quality of life.
This qualitative study utilized methods detailed in the literature on grounded theory and phenomenological research to analyze interviews collected from participants diagnosed with ILO. Interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed. Transcriptions underwent content-analysis using Burnard's 14 step method [15], which included review of content codes across multiple raters until consensus regarding analyses was reached.
Twenty-six participants were included in the study. Most participants were female (92%). Ages ranged from 18-72 with a mean age of 45 for female participants and 37 for male participants. Without specific prompting to do so, all participants offered descriptions of the specific symptoms they experienced and the triggers for their symptoms. In the content analysis process, "descriptions of symptoms and triggers" was thus labeled a theme that was present in all interviews. Seven additional themes were shared consistently and judged to encapsulate the interview material. These themes were: 2) diagnosis and treatment, 3) emotional impact of ILO, 4) perception of health and prognosis, 5) ameliorating factors, 6) influence of ILO on lifestyle, 7) the physical impact of ILO, and 8), social consequences of ILO. In addition, 54 subthemes were identified.
Patients appear to place particular emphasis on the emotional and psychosocial consequences of ILO as well as factors that ameliorate the condition. As such, future efforts to treat ILO and to collect outcomes measures should account for these aspects of the patient experience.
可诱导性喉阻塞(ILO)在相当一部分寻求治疗的人群中引起或导致呼吸困难,包括那些被误诊为哮喘的人群。尽管人们对这种疾病的认识不断提高,但探索患者体验的文献有限。本研究旨在报告患者对 ILO 的看法,以及它对生活质量的影响方式。
本定性研究采用文献中详细描述的扎根理论和现象学研究方法,分析从诊断为 ILO 的参与者中收集的访谈。进行了访谈、录音和转录。使用 Burnard 的 14 步方法[15]对转录本进行内容分析,该方法包括对多个评分者的内容代码进行审查,直到对分析达成共识。
本研究纳入了 26 名参与者。大多数参与者为女性(92%)。年龄范围为 18-72 岁,女性参与者的平均年龄为 45 岁,男性参与者的平均年龄为 37 岁。在没有特别提示的情况下,所有参与者都描述了他们所经历的具体症状以及症状的触发因素。在内容分析过程中,“症状和触发因素的描述”被标记为一个主题,存在于所有访谈中。一致分享了另外七个主题,并被认为包含了访谈材料。这些主题是:2)诊断和治疗,3)ILO 的情绪影响,4)对健康和预后的感知,5)缓解因素,6)ILO 对生活方式的影响,7)ILO 的身体影响,以及 8)ILO 的社会后果。此外,确定了 54 个子主题。
患者似乎特别强调 ILO 的情绪和心理社会后果以及缓解病情的因素。因此,未来治疗 ILO 和收集结果措施的努力应考虑到患者体验的这些方面。