Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (B.W.S., M.P.M., R.C.T., A.I.M.G., T.M.B.).
University of Missouri-Kansas City (B.W.S., M.P.M., A.O.I., R.C.T., Y.J.C., P.G.J., A.I.M.G., T.M.B.).
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jul;17(7):e016577. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016577. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
Quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) on positron-emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging is a measure of the overall health of the coronary circulation. The ability to adequately augment blood flow, measured by myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR), is associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The age-specific ranges of MBFR in patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease have not been well established. We aimed to determine the effect of age and sex on MBF in a cohort of patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease.
Patients who underwent positron-emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging studies from 2012 to 2022 on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography cameras were included if the summed stress score was 0, the coronary calcium score was 0, and the left ventricular ejection fraction was ≥50%. Those with known coronary artery disease, prior history of coronary intervention, diabetes, heart/kidney/liver transplant, cirrhosis, or chronic kidney disease stage IV+ were excluded. MBF was calculated using a net retention model (ImagenQ, Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies, Kansas City), and quantile regression models were developed to predict MBF.
Among 2789 patients (age 59.9±13.0 years, 76.4% females), median rest MBF was 0.73 (0.60-0.91) mL/min·g, stress MBF was 1.72 (1.41-2.10) mL/min·g, and MBFR was 2.31 (1.96-2.74). Across all ages, males augmented MBF in response to vasodilator stress to a greater degree than females but achieved lower absolute stress MBF. Younger males in particular achieved a higher MBFR than their female counterparts, and this gap narrowed with increasing age. Predicted MBFR for a 20-year-old male was 3.18 and female was 2.50, while predicted MBFR for an 80-year-old male was 2.17 and female was 2.02.
In patients without demonstrable coronary artery disease, MBFR is higher in younger males than younger females and decreases with age in both sexes. Age- and sex-specific MBFR may be important in risk prediction and guidance for revascularization and warrant further study.
正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像的定量心肌血流(MBF)是冠状动脉循环整体健康的衡量标准。通过心肌血流储备(MBFR)充分增加血流的能力与较低的主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率相关。在没有明显冠状动脉疾病的患者中,MBFR 的年龄特异性范围尚未得到很好的确定。我们旨在确定年龄和性别对无明显冠状动脉疾病患者 MBF 的影响。
纳入 2012 年至 2022 年期间在正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描相机上接受正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像研究的患者,如果总和应激评分为 0,冠状动脉钙评分为 0,左心室射血分数≥50%。排除已知冠状动脉疾病、既往冠状动脉介入史、糖尿病、心脏/肾脏/肝脏移植、肝硬化或慢性肾脏病 4 期+患者。使用净保留模型(ImagenQ,心血管成像技术,堪萨斯城)计算 MBF,并开发分位数回归模型来预测 MBF。
在 2789 名患者(年龄 59.9±13.0 岁,76.4%为女性)中,静息 MBF 中位数为 0.73(0.60-0.91)mL/min·g,应激 MBF 为 1.72(1.41-2.10)mL/min·g,MBFR 为 2.31(1.96-2.74)。在所有年龄段,男性对血管扩张剂应激的 MBF 增加程度大于女性,但达到的绝对应激 MBF 较低。尤其是年轻男性的 MBFR 高于女性,且这种差距随着年龄的增长而缩小。预测 20 岁男性的 MBFR 为 3.18,女性为 2.50,而预测 80 岁男性的 MBFR 为 2.17,女性为 2.02。
在没有明显冠状动脉疾病的患者中,MBFR 在年轻男性中高于年轻女性,且在两性中均随年龄增长而降低。年龄和性别特异性 MBFR 可能对风险预测和血运重建指导很重要,值得进一步研究。