Laurell L
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1985;26:160p..
The main aims of this thesis were 1) to study the pattern of axially directed occlusal forces developed during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with cross-arch bridges, 2) to find out to what extent these forces are influenced by the amount of periodontal tissue supporting the bridge abutments and 3) to study the chewing ability in subjects supplied with cross-arch bridges. For the purpose of aims 1 and 2 a method was developed which permits measurement of occlusal forces in various parts of as well as over the entire dentition simultaneously. The method is based on the use of strain-gauge transducers mounted into pontics or artificial teeth. Two groups, each comprising 12 subjects, were included in the studies of occlusal forces. In one group, the periodontal support included bilateral molar end abutments. In the other group, molar/premolar end abutments were unilaterally missing and replaced with posterior two-unit cantilevers. In each subject, four transducers were used, bilaterally distributed to represent the posterior and anterior regions and mounted so as to measure forces perpendicular to the occlusal plane. The occlusal forces were measured during 3 activities: 1) chewing and swallowing, 2) biting with maximal strength in habitual occlusion, expressing the voluntary capacity of the jaw-closing muscles, and 3) clenching between two antagonistic teeth, expressing the transient periodontal force withstanding capacity in that region. The amount of periodontal tissue supporting the bridge abutments was assessed from radiographs. The chewing ability was studied using a fractional sieving technique in principle according to Helkimo el al (1978) and was compared with the chewing ability of subjects with complete healthy dentitions and complete denture wearers. The mean total chewing force amounted to about 100 Newtons (N) in dentitions with cross-arch bilateral end abutment bridges, compared to about 50 N in dentitions with cross-arch unilateral posterior two-unit cantilever bridges (P less than 0.01). The mean maximal bite force in habitual occlusion amounted to 320 N and 264 N respectively (NS). In the presence of end abutments, the chewing and biting forces were significantly larger in the posterior than in the anterior regions. The local forces on the distal cantilever unit were, however, equal to or smaller than those in the anterior regions and much smaller than have been suggested in the literature.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
1)研究使用跨牙弓桥修复牙列在咀嚼和咬合过程中产生的轴向咬合力量模式;2)确定这些力量受支持桥基牙牙周组织量影响的程度;3)研究佩戴跨牙弓桥的受试者的咀嚼能力。为实现目标1和2,开发了一种方法,该方法允许同时测量整个牙列各个部位以及整个牙列上的咬合力。该方法基于将应变片式传感器安装到桥体或人造牙中。在咬合力研究中纳入了两组,每组12名受试者。一组中,牙周支持包括双侧磨牙末端基牙。另一组中,单侧磨牙/前磨牙末端基牙缺失,由后牙双单位悬臂梁替代。在每个受试者中,使用四个传感器,双侧分布以代表前后区域,并进行安装以测量垂直于咬合平面的力。在三种活动期间测量咬合力:1)咀嚼和吞咽;2)在习惯性咬合中以最大力量咬合,以表达咬肌的自主能力;3)在两颗拮抗牙之间紧咬,以表达该区域牙周组织的瞬时承受力。从X光片评估支持桥基牙的牙周组织量。使用原则上根据Helkimo等人(1978年)的分数筛分技术研究咀嚼能力,并与拥有完整健康牙列的受试者和全口义齿佩戴者的咀嚼能力进行比较。与单侧后牙双单位悬臂梁桥修复牙列中约50牛顿(N)相比,双侧末端基牙跨牙弓桥修复牙列中的平均总咀嚼力约为100牛顿(P<0.01)。习惯性咬合中的平均最大咬合力分别为320N和264N(无显著性差异)。在存在末端基牙的情况下,后部的咀嚼和咬合力明显大于前部区域。然而,远端悬臂梁单位上的局部力等于或小于前部区域的力,且远小于文献中所建议的力。(摘要截于400字)