Suppr超能文献

将正念练习与生成符号活动——环境和符号圈中的自我-他人参照联系起来。

Connecting Mindfulness Practice to Generative Semiotic Activity-Self-Other Referent in Umwelt and Semiosphere.

机构信息

Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):855-868. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09851-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Abstract

In this comment paper on von Fircks (2023a), I would like to focus on four issues and offer some reflections on them: first, what is happening in the process of a new I arising through mindfulness meditation practice? I would like to supplement the dialogue between Buber and Rogers in 1957 on the dynamism of I and Me, which is the basis of Mead's theory of self formation, in which I and Me separate, discover and meet a new self. The second, is that meditation, which at first glance appears to be an internal meditation practice and a personal activity, leads to a semiotic mediated social process. The Tao and early Buddhist ideas that form the background to the experiential process of mindfulness meditation will be reviewed, and the significance of people experiencing the interdependence of non-human nature and the environment through the practice will be discussed. Third, connecting this to the idea of Umwelt (Uexküll) and the semiosphere (Lotman), an attempt is made to extend the otherness as a collating body of self formation to Umwelt. Fourth, mindfulness meditation focuses attention on the breath. In relation to Mead's focus on the environment under the skin, i.e. corporeality, I will supplement the psychological meaning of cultivating the body's sense of interoception through the sensing of repetitive movements of tension and relaxation. Through the above, what kind of semiotic mediating function does mindfulness meditation have in relation to the construction of the new I, and how does it lead to the creation of social meaning? We would like to discuss these points. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The article does not contain any studies with clinical trial. This, clinical Trial registration is not applicable.

摘要

在这篇关于冯·菲尔克斯(2023a)的评论文章中,我想重点讨论四个问题,并对此进行反思:第一,正念冥想实践中通过什么过程产生新的“我”?我想补充 1957 年布伯和罗杰斯之间关于“我”和“我”的动态对话,这是米德自我形成理论的基础,在该理论中,“我”和“我”分离,发现并遇到新的自我。第二,乍一看,冥想似乎是一种内在的冥想实践和个人活动,但它会导致一种符号中介的社会过程。将回顾构成正念冥想体验过程背景的道家和早期佛教思想,并讨论人们通过实践体验非人类自然和环境相互依存的意义。第三,将这一点与环境(Uexküll)和符号圈(Lotman)的概念联系起来,试图将作为自我形成的校对身体的他者扩展到环境中。第四,正念冥想将注意力集中在呼吸上。与米德关注皮肤下的环境,即身体性,我将通过感知紧张和放松的重复运动来补充培养身体内感受知的身体意义。通过以上几点,正念冥想在构建新的“我”方面具有什么样的符号中介功能,以及它如何导致社会意义的创造?我们想讨论这些问题。临床实验注册:本文不包含任何临床试验。因此,本临床实验注册不适用。

相似文献

2
Meditation and Self-transcendence: A Human Need?冥想与自我超越:人类的需求?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):878-883. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09848-6. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
4
Mindfulness in cultural context.文化背景下的正念。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;52(4):447-69. doi: 10.1177/1363461515598949.
5
The question of mindfulness' connection with ethics and compassion.正念与伦理和同情的关系问题。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Is mindfulness Buddhist? (and why it matters).正念是佛教的吗?(以及为何这很重要)。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;52(4):470-84. doi: 10.1177/1363461514557561. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Understanding The Process of Taoistic-Informed Mindfulness from a Meadian Perspective.从梅迪奇视角理解道教正念的过程。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):787-806. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09805-9. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding The Process of Taoistic-Informed Mindfulness from a Meadian Perspective.从梅迪奇视角理解道教正念的过程。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):787-806. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09805-9. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Mind-Body Correlation and its Logic: the Experience of "Invisible Body".身心关联及其逻辑:“无形之体”的体验
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Sep;56(3):560-572. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09654-4. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
3
Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body.内感受:对身体生理状况的感知。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):500-5. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验