Department of Surgery, Klinik Für MIC, Kurstr. 11, 14129, Berlin, Germany.
Statistical Consulting Unit StaBLab, Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5068-5075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11011-6. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
An increasing number of reflux patients opt for magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) instead of fundoplication. However, few studies compare the medium-term efficacy and safety of the procedures.
We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of consecutive MSA and Nissen fundoplication cases between 01/2015 and 06/2020. Patients underwent surgery, including hiatoplasty, for medical treatment-resistant reflux due to hiatal hernia. Surgical revision and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reuptake rates were the primary outcomes. We also compared adverse event rates. Patients with severe preoperative dysphagia/motility disorders were assigned different treatment pathways and excluded from the analysis. We used propensity-score matching to reduce confounding between treatments.
Out of 411 eligible patients, 141 patients who underwent MSA and 141 with fundoplication had similar propensity scores and were analyzed. On average, patients were 55 ± 12 years old and overweight (BMI: 28 ± 5). At 3.9 years of mean follow-up, MSA was associated with lower surgical revision risk as compared to fundoplication (1.2% vs 3.0% per year, respectively; HR: 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.04), and similar PPI-reuptake risk (2.6% vs 4.2% per year; HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.16; p = 0.12). Adverse event rates during primary stay were similar (MSA vs. fundoplication: 1% vs. 3%, p = 0.68). Fewer patients experienced adverse events in the MSA group after discharge (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.11), driven by higher rates of self-limiting dysphagia (1% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) and gas/bloating (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.06) after fundoplication. Differences between MSA and fundoplication in dysphagia requiring diagnostic endoscopy (11% vs. 8%, p = 0.54) or surgical revision (2% vs. 1%, p = 1.0) were non-significant. The device explantation rate was 4% (5/141).
MSA reduces the re-operation risk compared to fundoplication and may decrease adverse event rates after discharge. Randomized head-to-head studies between available surgical options are needed.
越来越多的反流病患者选择磁括约肌增强术(MSA)而非胃底折叠术。然而,很少有研究比较这两种手术的中期疗效和安全性。
我们对 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间连续进行的 MSA 和 Nissen 胃底折叠术病例进行了回顾性单中心分析。这些患者因食管裂孔疝而接受手术治疗,包括横膈成形术,以治疗药物难治性反流。手术翻修和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)再摄取率是主要结局。我们还比较了不良事件发生率。术前存在严重吞咽困难/运动障碍的患者被分配到不同的治疗路径,并排除在分析之外。我们使用倾向评分匹配来减少治疗之间的混杂。
在 411 名符合条件的患者中,141 名接受 MSA 治疗的患者和 141 名接受胃底折叠术治疗的患者具有相似的倾向评分,并进行了分析。平均而言,患者年龄为 55±12 岁,体重指数(BMI)为 28±5。在平均 3.9 年的随访中,与胃底折叠术相比,MSA 降低了手术翻修风险(每年分别为 1.2%和 3.0%;HR:0.38;95%CI:0.15-0.96;p=0.04),且 PPI 再摄取风险相似(每年分别为 2.6%和 4.2%;HR:0.59;95%CI:0.30-1.16;p=0.12)。初次住院期间的不良事件发生率相似(MSA 与胃底折叠术:1%与 3%,p=0.68)。MSA 组出院后发生不良事件的患者较少(24%与 33%,p=0.11),这主要归因于自限性吞咽困难(1%与 9%,p<0.01)和气体/腹胀(10%与 18%,p=0.06)的发生率较低。MSA 与胃底折叠术在需要诊断性内镜检查的吞咽困难(11%与 8%,p=0.54)或手术翻修(2%与 1%,p=1.0)方面的差异无统计学意义。设备取出率为 4%(5/141)。
与胃底折叠术相比,MSA 降低了手术翻修风险,并且可能降低了出院后的不良事件发生率。需要进行比较现有手术选择的随机对照研究。