Mansilla-Polo Miguel, Morgado-Carrasco Daniel
Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):1983-2038. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01203-2. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology.
A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.
Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections.
Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi.
生物药物(BD)和 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)相关感染风险在文献中已得到广泛探讨。然而,缺乏同时评估这两类药物并进行比较的研究。在此,我们综述皮肤科使用的 BD 和 JAKi 相关感染风险。
进行叙述性综述。选取 2010 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月间所有评估 BD 和 JAKi 感染风险及机会性感染的相关文章。
总体而言,BD 和 JAKi 相关的感染、严重感染及机会性感染发生率较低,但高于普通人群。已证明获批用于皮肤病的 JAKi(阿布昔替尼、巴瑞替尼、氘可来昔替尼、乌帕替尼、利特昔替尼和外用芦可替尼)是安全的,感染率较低。我们发现风险升高,尤其是抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗 TNF)药物、利妥昔单抗和 JAKi(特别是高剂量托法替布)。与感染的特定关联包括抗 TNF 药物和托珠单抗导致的结核病及结核再激活;抗白细胞介素(IL)-17 药物导致的念珠菌病;利妥昔单抗、抗 TNF 和 JAKi 导致的乙型肝炎病毒再激活;JAKi(特别是高剂量托法替布和乌帕替尼)导致的单纯疱疹和带状疱疹感染。优特克单抗和抗 IL-23 感染发生率极低。抗 IL-1、奈莫利单抗、曲洛珠单抗和奥马珠单抗与感染风险增加无关。度普利尤单抗可降低皮肤感染发生率。
抗 TNF 药物、利妥昔单抗和 JAKi(特别是托法替布)可增加感染风险。建议对接受这些治疗的患者进行密切监测。需要进行长期随访的前瞻性研究以比较评估 BD 和 JAKi 治疗所致感染风险。