Frankfurter Raphael G, Willet Victoria, Richardson Eugene T, Rutherford George W, Baller April, Kelly J Daniel
University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
WHO Health Emergencies (WHE) Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ Public Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000556. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
To review evidence pertaining to methods for preventing healthcare-associated filovirus infections (including the survivability of filoviruses in clinical environments and the chlorine concentration required for effective disinfection), and to assess protocols for determining the risk of health worker (HW) exposures to filoviruses.
Integrative review.
PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, internet-based sources of international health organisations (eg, WHO, CDC), references of the included literature and grey literature.
Laboratory science, clinical research and real-world observational studies identified through comprehensive search strings that pertained to Ebola disease and Marburg disease and the three research objectives.
Using the framework of population, intervention or exposure, outcomes, study types and report characteristics, reviewers extracted data and critically appraised the evidence using predefined data extraction forms and summary tables. The extraction forms, summary tables and critical appraisals varied based on the included literature; we used both the QUIPS Risk-of-Bias tool when possible and an internally developed instrument to systematically extract and review the evidence from observational and experimental studies. Evidence was then synthesised and summarised to create summary recommendations.
Thirty-six studies (including duplicates across research questions) were included in our reviews. All studies that related to the review questions were either (1) descriptive, real-world studies (ie, environmental audits of various surfaces in operational Ebola Treatment Units) or (2) controlled, laboratory studies (ie, experimental studies on the survivability of ebolaviruses in controlled conditions), presenting a range of concerns pertaining to bias and external validity. Our reviews of viral survivability evidence revealed significant disconnections between laboratory-based and real-world findings. However, there is greater viral persistence in liquid than dried body fluids, with the possible exception of blood, and ebolaviruses can survive for significant periods of time in dried substrate. Evidence suggests that 0.5% hypochlorite solution should be used for disinfection activity. Spills should be cleaned with covering and soaking for 15 min. Existing literature suggests that within a well-resourced clinical environment with trained, foreign HWs and established protocols, transmission of ebolaviruses as an occupational risk is a rare event. Despite the high rates of HW infections within public African healthcare settings, no evidence with low risk of bias exists to assess the risk of various occupational exposures given that all high-quality studies were conducted on foreign Ebola clinicians who had low overall rates of infection. This review underscores the critical need for better-quality evidence to inform best practices to ensure HW safety during filovirus disease epidemics.
回顾与预防医疗保健相关丝状病毒感染方法(包括丝状病毒在临床环境中的存活能力以及有效消毒所需的氯浓度)相关的证据,并评估确定卫生工作者接触丝状病毒风险的方案。
综合综述。
PubMed、Embase、谷歌学术、国际卫生组织的网络资源(如世界卫生组织、美国疾病控制与预防中心)、纳入文献的参考文献及灰色文献。
通过与埃博拉疾病和马尔堡疾病以及三个研究目标相关的综合检索词确定的实验室科学、临床研究和实际观察性研究。
使用人群、干预或暴露、结局、研究类型和报告特征框架,评审人员提取数据并使用预定义的数据提取表和汇总表对证据进行严格评估。提取表、汇总表和严格评估根据纳入文献而有所不同;我们尽可能使用QUIPS偏倚风险工具以及内部开发的工具,系统地从观察性和实验性研究中提取和审查证据。然后对证据进行综合和总结,以提出总结性建议。
我们的综述纳入了36项研究(包括跨研究问题的重复研究)。所有与综述问题相关的研究要么是(1)描述性的实际研究(即对运行中的埃博拉治疗单位各种表面的环境审计),要么是(2)对照实验室研究(即在受控条件下对埃博拉病毒存活能力的实验研究),存在一系列与偏倚和外部效度相关的问题。我们对病毒存活能力证据的综述揭示了基于实验室的研究结果与实际情况之间存在重大脱节。然而,除血液外,液体中的病毒持久性高于干燥体液,并且埃博拉病毒可以在干燥的基质中存活很长时间。有证据表明,应使用0.5%的次氯酸盐溶液进行消毒。溢出物应覆盖并浸泡15分钟后进行清理。现有文献表明,在资源充足、有经过培训的外籍卫生工作者且有既定方案的临床环境中,埃博拉病毒作为职业风险的传播是罕见事件。尽管在非洲公共医疗环境中卫生工作者感染率很高,但鉴于所有高质量研究均针对总体感染率较低的外国埃博拉临床医生进行,因此不存在低偏倚风险的证据来评估各种职业暴露的风险。本综述强调迫切需要质量更高的证据来为最佳实践提供信息,以确保在丝状病毒疾病流行期间卫生工作者的安全。