• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗机构中疑似或确诊丝状病毒病患者护理的感染预防与控制研究,重点关注埃博拉和马尔堡病毒:一项综合综述

Infection prevention and control studies for care of patients with suspected or confirmed filovirus disease in healthcare settings, with focus on Ebola and Marburg: an integrative review.

作者信息

Frankfurter Raphael G, Willet Victoria, Richardson Eugene T, Rutherford George W, Baller April, Kelly J Daniel

机构信息

University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.

WHO Health Emergencies (WHE) Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Public Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000556. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2023-000556
PMID:39015119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251729/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence pertaining to methods for preventing healthcare-associated filovirus infections (including the survivability of filoviruses in clinical environments and the chlorine concentration required for effective disinfection), and to assess protocols for determining the risk of health worker (HW) exposures to filoviruses.

DESIGN

Integrative review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, internet-based sources of international health organisations (eg, WHO, CDC), references of the included literature and grey literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Laboratory science, clinical research and real-world observational studies identified through comprehensive search strings that pertained to Ebola disease and Marburg disease and the three research objectives.

METHODS

Using the framework of population, intervention or exposure, outcomes, study types and report characteristics, reviewers extracted data and critically appraised the evidence using predefined data extraction forms and summary tables. The extraction forms, summary tables and critical appraisals varied based on the included literature; we used both the QUIPS Risk-of-Bias tool when possible and an internally developed instrument to systematically extract and review the evidence from observational and experimental studies. Evidence was then synthesised and summarised to create summary recommendations.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies (including duplicates across research questions) were included in our reviews. All studies that related to the review questions were either (1) descriptive, real-world studies (ie, environmental audits of various surfaces in operational Ebola Treatment Units) or (2) controlled, laboratory studies (ie, experimental studies on the survivability of ebolaviruses in controlled conditions), presenting a range of concerns pertaining to bias and external validity. Our reviews of viral survivability evidence revealed significant disconnections between laboratory-based and real-world findings. However, there is greater viral persistence in liquid than dried body fluids, with the possible exception of blood, and ebolaviruses can survive for significant periods of time in dried substrate. Evidence suggests that 0.5% hypochlorite solution should be used for disinfection activity. Spills should be cleaned with covering and soaking for 15 min. Existing literature suggests that within a well-resourced clinical environment with trained, foreign HWs and established protocols, transmission of ebolaviruses as an occupational risk is a rare event. Despite the high rates of HW infections within public African healthcare settings, no evidence with low risk of bias exists to assess the risk of various occupational exposures given that all high-quality studies were conducted on foreign Ebola clinicians who had low overall rates of infection. This review underscores the critical need for better-quality evidence to inform best practices to ensure HW safety during filovirus disease epidemics.

摘要

目的

回顾与预防医疗保健相关丝状病毒感染方法(包括丝状病毒在临床环境中的存活能力以及有效消毒所需的氯浓度)相关的证据,并评估确定卫生工作者接触丝状病毒风险的方案。

设计

综合综述。

数据来源

PubMed、Embase、谷歌学术、国际卫生组织的网络资源(如世界卫生组织、美国疾病控制与预防中心)、纳入文献的参考文献及灰色文献。

研究选择

通过与埃博拉疾病和马尔堡疾病以及三个研究目标相关的综合检索词确定的实验室科学、临床研究和实际观察性研究。

方法

使用人群、干预或暴露、结局、研究类型和报告特征框架,评审人员提取数据并使用预定义的数据提取表和汇总表对证据进行严格评估。提取表、汇总表和严格评估根据纳入文献而有所不同;我们尽可能使用QUIPS偏倚风险工具以及内部开发的工具,系统地从观察性和实验性研究中提取和审查证据。然后对证据进行综合和总结,以提出总结性建议。

结果

我们的综述纳入了36项研究(包括跨研究问题的重复研究)。所有与综述问题相关的研究要么是(1)描述性的实际研究(即对运行中的埃博拉治疗单位各种表面的环境审计),要么是(2)对照实验室研究(即在受控条件下对埃博拉病毒存活能力的实验研究),存在一系列与偏倚和外部效度相关的问题。我们对病毒存活能力证据的综述揭示了基于实验室的研究结果与实际情况之间存在重大脱节。然而,除血液外,液体中的病毒持久性高于干燥体液,并且埃博拉病毒可以在干燥的基质中存活很长时间。有证据表明,应使用0.5%的次氯酸盐溶液进行消毒。溢出物应覆盖并浸泡15分钟后进行清理。现有文献表明,在资源充足、有经过培训的外籍卫生工作者且有既定方案的临床环境中,埃博拉病毒作为职业风险的传播是罕见事件。尽管在非洲公共医疗环境中卫生工作者感染率很高,但鉴于所有高质量研究均针对总体感染率较低的外国埃博拉临床医生进行,因此不存在低偏倚风险的证据来评估各种职业暴露的风险。本综述强调迫切需要质量更高的证据来为最佳实践提供信息,以确保在丝状病毒疾病流行期间卫生工作者的安全。

相似文献

1
Infection prevention and control studies for care of patients with suspected or confirmed filovirus disease in healthcare settings, with focus on Ebola and Marburg: an integrative review.医疗机构中疑似或确诊丝状病毒病患者护理的感染预防与控制研究,重点关注埃博拉和马尔堡病毒:一项综合综述
BMJ Public Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000556. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standards职业安全与健康管理局血源性病原体标准
8
Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map.应对机构内儿童虐待的干预措施:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;17(1):e1139. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1139. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ebola epidemic is ongoing in West Africa and responses from China are positive.埃博拉疫情正在西非持续蔓延,中国的反应是积极的。
Mil Med Res. 2015 Apr 3;2:9. doi: 10.1186/s40779-015-0031-8. eCollection 2015.