Khan Muhammad Z, Alvarez Rene, Bhuiyan Mohammad Alfrad Nobel, Faisal Abu Saleh Mosa, O'Neill Parker, Siddiqui Muhammad, Kaki Praneet, Franklin Sona, Waqas Muhammad, Shah Hadia, Kanawati Eyad I, Murtaza Mohammed
Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Heart Failure, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 16;16(6):e62477. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62477. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Introduction Data regarding clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with sarcoidosis is lacking. This study aims to clarify the clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Methods Data was collected from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 using validated ICD-10-CM codes for sarcoidosis, TAVR, and SAVR. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who underwent TAVR and those who underwent SAVR. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-squared test to determine clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Results The prevalence of sarcoidosis was 0.23% among total study patients (n=142,420,378). After exclusions, the prevalence of TAVR was 650 (49%) and SAVR was 675 (51%) in patients with sarcoidosis. Patients who underwent TAVR were on average older (74 vs 65 years old, p=0.001), and more likely to be female (57 vs 40%, p<0.001) compared to patients who underwent SAVR. The TAVR cohort had higher rates of congestive heart failure (CHF) (77.7 vs 42.2%, p=0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (42.3 vs 24.4% p=0.001), anemia (5.4 vs 2.2%, p=0.004), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (1.5 vs 0%, p=0.004), and hypothyroidism (31.5 vs 16.3%, p=0.001) compared to the SAVR cohort. Inpatient mortality post-procedure was higher in the SAVR cohort compared to the TAVR cohort (15 vs 0, p=0.001). Regarding post-procedure complications, respiratory complications were more common in the SAVR cohort (4.4 vs 0%, p=0.001), while TAVR was associated with a higher incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion (2.15 vs 0.8%, p=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) (0.8 vs 1.5%, p=0.33), AKI requiring hemodialysis (0 vs. 0.7%, p=0.08), or stroke (0.8 vs 0.7, p=1) post-procedure between the two cohorts. Conclusion This study found that in the sarcoidosis population, TAVR was associated with reduced mortality, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower hospitalization costs in comparison to SAVR.
关于结节病患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后的临床结局的数据尚缺乏。本研究旨在阐明结节病患者TAVR与SAVR的临床结局。方法:使用经过验证的用于结节病、TAVR和SAVR的ICD-10-CM编码,从2016年至2019年的国家住院样本数据库中收集数据。患者被分为两个队列:接受TAVR的患者和接受SAVR的患者。采用Pearson卡方检验进行统计分析,以确定结节病患者中TAVR与SAVR的临床结局。结果:在全部研究患者(n = 142,420,378)中,结节病的患病率为0.23%。排除后,结节病患者中TAVR的患病率为650例(49%),SAVR为675例(51%)。与接受SAVR的患者相比,接受TAVR的患者平均年龄更大(74岁对65岁,p = 0.001),且更可能为女性(57%对40%,p < 0.001)。TAVR队列中充血性心力衰竭(CHF)发生率更高(77.7%对42.2%,p = 0.001)、慢性肾脏病(CKD)发生率更高(42.3%对24.4%,p = 0.001)、贫血发生率更高(5.4%对2.2%,p = 0.004)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)发生率更高(1.5%对0%,p = 0.004)以及甲状腺功能减退发生率更高(31.5%对16.3%,p = 0.001)。与TAVR队列相比,SAVR队列术后住院死亡率更高(15例对0例,p = 0.001)。关于术后并发症,SAVR队列中呼吸并发症更常见(4.4%对0%,p = 0.001),而TAVR与永久起搏器(PPM)植入发生率更高相关(2.15%对0.8%,p = 0.001)。两个队列术后急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率(0.8%对1.5%,p = 0.33)、需要血液透析的AKI发生率(0对0.7%,p = 0.08)或卒中发生率(0.8对0.7,p = 1)无统计学差异。结论:本研究发现,在结节病人群中,与SAVR相比,TAVR与死亡率降低、住院时间缩短及住院费用降低相关。