• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估姑息治疗学生学习成果的工具:文献综述。

Instruments for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Literature Review.

出版信息

J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2024 Oct 1;26(5):265-272. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051
PMID:39016275
Abstract

Primary palliative care is a core component of nursing practice for which all students must receive formal education. Through competency-based education, nursing students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills to deliver quality primary palliative care before they transition to practice. Nurse educators in academic and practice settings should use reliable and valid means to evaluate student learning across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Expert faculty conducted a literature review to identify published instruments that evaluate primary palliative care student learning outcomes. Selected articles were required to include instrument reliability, validity, or both. The literature search yielded 20 articles that report on the development and testing of 21 instruments. Findings are organized into 3 learning domains that encompass 5 outcomes. Four instruments assess knowledge within the cognitive domain. In the affective domain, 3 instruments assess attitudes about caring for seriously ill or dying patients, 7 assess attitudes about death, and 5 assess self-efficacy. Competence and competency are evaluated in the psychomotor domain with 4 tools. Instrument implementation considerations within each domain are discussed. Faculty are encouraged to use robust evaluation measures such as those identified in the literature review to measure primary palliative care learning outcomes within a competency-based education framework.

摘要

初级姑息治疗是护理实践的核心组成部分,所有学生都必须接受正规教育。通过基于能力的教育,护理学生在过渡到实践之前,发展出提供优质初级姑息治疗的知识、态度和技能。学术和实践环境中的护理教师应该使用可靠和有效的方法来评估学生在认知、情感和心理运动领域的学习成果。专家教师进行了文献回顾,以确定评估初级姑息治疗学生学习成果的已发表工具。选定的文章必须包括仪器的可靠性、有效性或两者兼而有之。文献检索产生了 20 篇报告 21 种工具的开发和测试的文章。研究结果分为涵盖 5 个结果的 3 个学习领域。有 4 种工具评估认知领域的知识。在情感领域,有 3 种工具评估照顾重病或临终患者的态度,7 种工具评估对死亡的态度,5 种工具评估自我效能。4 种工具在心理运动领域评估能力和能力。讨论了每个领域中工具实施的注意事项。鼓励教师使用文献综述中确定的可靠评估措施来衡量基于能力的教育框架内的初级姑息治疗学习成果。

相似文献

1
Instruments for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Literature Review.评估姑息治疗学生学习成果的工具:文献综述。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2024 Oct 1;26(5):265-272. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
A modified systematic review of research evidence about education for pre-registration nurses in palliative care.关于临终关怀领域预注册护士教育的研究证据的改良系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 10;13:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-56. eCollection 2014.
6
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.
7
The effectiveness of tools used to evaluate successful critical decision making skills for applicants to healthcare graduate educational programs: a systematic review.用于评估医疗保健研究生教育项目申请者成功关键决策技能的工具的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):231-75. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2322.
8
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
9
Nursing students' experiences with patient death and palliative and end-of-life care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.护理专业学生对患者死亡及姑息治疗和临终关怀的体验:系统评价与元综合。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103625. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-sectional survey on the relationship between metacognitive ability and completion ability among Chinese nursing students: the mediating role of perceived campus atmosphere ability and the moderation of simulation teaching method.中国护理专业学生元认知能力与完成能力关系的横断面调查:感知校园氛围能力的中介作用及模拟教学方法的调节作用
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 26;24(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03227-1.
2
A Nursing Faculty Intervention for Teaching Primary Palliative Care in Baccalaureate Nursing Competency-Based Education.一项针对本科护理能力本位教育中初级姑息治疗教学的护理教师干预措施。
Palliat Med Rep. 2025 Feb 10;6(1):61-70. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0079. eCollection 2025.