• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮经肝胆囊引流术治疗 II 级急性胆囊炎后腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度的预测因素。

Predictors of the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):479-484. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001304.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001304
PMID:39016308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The predictors of difficulty performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for grade II acute cholecystitis have not been clearly understood.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed between January 2019 and February 2023 and involved 102 eligible patients with grade II acute cholecystitis. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: difficult LC group (n=14) and nondifficult LC group (n=88). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, and a logistic regression model was used for multivariate analyses of the significant factors identified in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Logistic multivariable regression analysis revealed that C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (odds ratio [OR]: 1.028, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.013-1.044; P <0.05), and time intervals between PTGBD and LC (OR: 1.047, 95% CI: 1.003-1.092; P =0.034) were independent predictors of difficult LC. When preoperative CRP was >154 mg/L, LC difficulty, blood loss, and operative time increased ( P <0.05, P =0.01, P =0.01, respectively) compared with CRP <154 mg/L. Difficult LC, increased blood loss, and longer operative time occurred more frequently when the interval between PTGBD and LC was >35 days compared with <35 days ( P <0.05, P =0.003, P =0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP levels >154 mg/L and intervals between PTGBD and LC exceeding 35 days are associated with greater LC difficulty.

摘要

背景

经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGBD)治疗 II 级急性胆囊炎后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的难度预测因素尚不清楚。

方法

本回顾性研究于 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月进行,共纳入 102 例符合条件的 II 级急性胆囊炎患者。患者分为 2 组:困难 LC 组(n=14)和非困难 LC 组(n=88)。分析了术前特征和术后结果,并对单因素分析中确定的显著因素进行了 logistic 多变量分析。

结果

logistic 多变量回归分析显示,C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平(比值比[OR]:1.028,95%置信区间[CI]:1.013-1.044;P<0.05)和 PTGBD 与 LC 之间的时间间隔(OR:1.047,95%CI:1.003-1.092;P=0.034)是 LC 难度的独立预测因素。当术前 CRP>154mg/L 时,LC 难度、出血量和手术时间均增加(P<0.05,P=0.01,P=0.01,分别),而 CRP<154mg/L 时则不然。与 PTGBD 与 LC 间隔<35 天相比,间隔>35 天时 LC 难度增加、出血量增加和手术时间延长更为常见(P<0.05,P=0.003,P=0.002,分别)。

结论

CRP 水平>154mg/L 和 PTGBD 与 LC 之间的时间间隔超过 35 天与更大的 LC 难度相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f2/11446531/cb8b58b6a552/sle-34-479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f2/11446531/21ff0ff03fba/sle-34-479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f2/11446531/cb8b58b6a552/sle-34-479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f2/11446531/21ff0ff03fba/sle-34-479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f2/11446531/cb8b58b6a552/sle-34-479-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis.经皮经肝胆囊引流术治疗 II 级急性胆囊炎后腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度的预测因素。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):479-484. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001304.
2
Influence of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Aspiration and Drainage for Severe Acute Cholecystitis on the Surgical Outcomes of Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Post Hoc Analysis of the CSGO-HBP-017 (CSGO-HBP-017C).经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术对后续腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗重度急性胆囊炎手术结局的影响:CSGO-HBP-017(CSGO-HBP-017C)的事后分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Feb 1;34(1):62-68. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001249.
3
The Success Rate Is Lower but Completion Rate of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is higher in Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage than Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.内镜经乳头胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎的成功率较低,但腹腔镜胆囊切除术的完成率较高。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):413-418. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001294.
4
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage followed by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis.对于中重度急性胆囊炎患者,先行经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术,然后择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(44):e8533. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008533.
5
Risk factors for difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in grade II acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo guidelines 2013.根据《2013东京指南》探讨Ⅱ级急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难的危险因素。
BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0319-6.
6
Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Complicated Cholecystitis: Comparison of Curative Efficacy.经皮经肝胆管引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术与急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性复杂性胆囊炎的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Mar 1;84(3):438-442.
7
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in severe acute cholecystitis: an analysis of prognostic risk factors.腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合经皮经肝胆管引流术治疗重症急性胆囊炎的临床疗效:预后危险因素分析
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 26;12:1609327. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1609327. eCollection 2025.
8
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3.
9
Early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆囊引流术后早期计划性腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1704-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9004-6. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
10
Interval cholecystectomy following drainage procedures for acute cholecystitis: percutaneous transhepatic vs endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage.急性胆囊炎引流术后择期胆囊切除术:经皮经肝与经内镜经乳头胆囊引流术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Nov;28(11):1912-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning algorithms as early diagnostic tools for prolonged operative time in patients with fluorescent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.机器学习算法作为荧光腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者手术时间延长的早期诊断工具:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 23;12:1582425. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1582425. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
New Scoring System for Prediction of Surgical Difficulty During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage.经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术难度预测的新评分系统
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Oct 27;6(2):296-306. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12522. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
How to Predict Postoperative Complications After Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: the Chole-Risk Score.如何预测急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后并发症:Chole-Risk 评分。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov;25(11):2814-2822. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04956-9. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
3
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.
经皮经肝胆囊引流术后早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82089-4.
4
Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and preoperative predictive factors.困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术及术前预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81938-6.
5
Predicting the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and validation of a pre-operative risk score using an objective operative difficulty grading system.预测困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:使用客观手术难度分级系统开发和验证术前风险评分。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4549-4561. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07244-5. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
6
Timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: a nationwide inpatient database study.经皮经肝胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎后行胆囊切除术的时机:一项全国性住院患者数据库研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Jun;22(6):920-926. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.2438. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Is ERCP-BD or EUS-BD the preferred decompression modality for malignant distal biliary obstruction? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)-BD 与内镜超声引导下胆管引流术(EUS-BD),哪种是恶性远端胆道梗阻的首选减压方式?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019 Dec;111(12):953-960. doi: 10.17235/reed.2019.6125/2018.
8
C-reactive protein level as a predictor of difficult emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.C-反应蛋白水平作为预测困难性急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的指标。
BJS Open. 2019 Jul 2;3(5):641-645. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50189. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Early cholecystectomy (≤ 8 weeks) following percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement is associated with higher morbidity.经皮胆囊造瘘管放置后≤ 8 周内进行早期胆囊切除术与更高的发病率相关。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3057-3063. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07050-z. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
10
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary treatment of distal malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导与内镜逆行胰胆管造影引导下胆汁引流治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的初步治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan;32(1):16-26. doi: 10.1111/den.13456. Epub 2019 Jul 6.