University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J Med Econ. 2024;27(sup3):9-23. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2379055. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
To estimate the budget impact of adding a toripalimab regimen as a treatment option to the existing pembrolizumab regimen, both including gemcitabine and cisplatin, in untreated recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) using the published wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) and average sales price (ASP).
Budget impact analysis comparing a treatment mix "without" versus "with" the toripalimab regimen in the US eligible annual incident R/M NPC population, a 3-year time horizon, toripalimab/pembrolizumab market splits of 60/40 (Y1) and 80/20 (Y2/3), and medication adjustments for discontinuation or progression. Cost inputs included drugs, administration, and adverse event (AE) management. The models were replicated for a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan in which costs per-member-per-month (PMPM) and per-member-per-year (PMPY) were estimated. One-way (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) as well as scenario analyses were performed.
In the "without" scenario, the 3-year WAC-based costs for the pembrolizumab regimen total $1,449,695,333 ($1,305,632,448 for treatment and $144,062,885 for managing AEs). In the "with" scenario, total 3-year costs for pembrolizumab decline to $380,012,135 with toripalimab adding $885,505,900 ($779,206,567 for treatment and $106,299,333 for AE management). Annual net savings range from $46,526,152 in 2024 to $71,194,214 in 2026, for 3-year savings of $184,177,298. Associated net savings in a 1-million-member health plan are $543,068 over 3 years with savings of $0.045 PMPM and $0.543 PMPY. The ASP-based model shows similar patterns with 3-year net savings of $174,235,983 in the US incident population and savings of $0.043 PMPM and $0.514 PMPY in a 1-million-member health plan. The PSA support base case findings; OWSA and scenario analyses reveal how parameter variability impacts results.
Savings between $174 million and $184 million can be achieved from treating 60% of R/M NPC patients in year 1 and 80% in years 2 and 3 with the toripalimab regimen over a similar pembrolizumab regimen.
使用已公布的批发采购成本(WAC)和平均销售价格(ASP),估算在未经治疗的复发/转移性鼻咽癌(R/M NPC)患者中,将替雷利珠单抗方案添加到现有帕博利珠单抗方案(包括吉西他滨和顺铂)中作为治疗选择的预算影响。该方案包括替雷利珠单抗和帕博利珠单抗。
在符合条件的美国年度 R/M NPC 发病人口中,比较“无”与“有”替雷利珠单抗方案的治疗组合,采用 3 年时间范围、替雷利珠单抗/帕博利珠单抗市场份额 60/40(Y1)和 80/20(Y2/3)以及因停药或进展而进行的药物调整。成本投入包括药物、管理和不良反应(AE)管理。该模型在一个假设的拥有 100 万成员的健康计划中进行了复制,其中估计了每成员每月(PMPM)和每成员每年(PMPY)的成本。进行了单因素(OWSA)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)以及情景分析。
在“无”方案中,基于 WAC 的 3 年帕博利珠单抗方案总成本为 144969.533 万美元(治疗费用为 130563.2448 万美元,AE 管理费用为 14406.2885 万美元)。在“有”方案中,替雷利珠单抗方案的 3 年总成本下降至 38001.2135 万美元,替雷利珠单抗增加了 88550.59 万美元(治疗费用为 77920.6567 万美元,AE 管理费用为 10629.9333 万美元)。2024 年至 2026 年,每年的净节省额范围为 4652.6152 万美元至 7119.4214 万美元,3 年节省额为 18417.7298 万美元。在一个拥有 100 万成员的健康计划中,相关的净节省额为 3 年节省 543068 美元,节省额为 0.045 PMPM 和 0.543 PMPY。基于 ASP 的模型显示出类似的模式,在美国 R/M NPC 发病人口中,3 年的净节省额为 17423.5983 万美元,在一个拥有 100 万成员的健康计划中,节省额为 0.043 PMPM 和 0.514 PMPY。PSA 支持基础案例结果;OWSA 和情景分析揭示了参数变化如何影响结果。
在 R/M NPC 患者中,替雷利珠单抗方案第一年治疗 60%的患者,第二年和第三年治疗 80%的患者,与类似的帕博利珠单抗方案相比,可以节省 1.74235983 亿美元至 1.84235983 亿美元。