Suppr超能文献

新型 PD-1 抑制剂拓益(特瑞普利单抗)对比帕博利珠单抗治疗复发或转移性鼻咽癌的预算影响分析。

Budget impact analysis of the novel PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab versus pembrolizumab in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

机构信息

University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2024;27(sup3):9-23. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2379055. Epub 2024 Aug 18.

Abstract

AIM

To estimate the budget impact of adding a toripalimab regimen as a treatment option to the existing pembrolizumab regimen, both including gemcitabine and cisplatin, in untreated recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) using the published wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) and average sales price (ASP).

METHODS

Budget impact analysis comparing a treatment mix "without" versus "with" the toripalimab regimen in the US eligible annual incident R/M NPC population, a 3-year time horizon, toripalimab/pembrolizumab market splits of 60/40 (Y1) and 80/20 (Y2/3), and medication adjustments for discontinuation or progression. Cost inputs included drugs, administration, and adverse event (AE) management. The models were replicated for a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan in which costs per-member-per-month (PMPM) and per-member-per-year (PMPY) were estimated. One-way (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) as well as scenario analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the "without" scenario, the 3-year WAC-based costs for the pembrolizumab regimen total $1,449,695,333 ($1,305,632,448 for treatment and $144,062,885 for managing AEs). In the "with" scenario, total 3-year costs for pembrolizumab decline to $380,012,135 with toripalimab adding $885,505,900 ($779,206,567 for treatment and $106,299,333 for AE management). Annual net savings range from $46,526,152 in 2024 to $71,194,214 in 2026, for 3-year savings of $184,177,298. Associated net savings in a 1-million-member health plan are $543,068 over 3 years with savings of $0.045 PMPM and $0.543 PMPY. The ASP-based model shows similar patterns with 3-year net savings of $174,235,983 in the US incident population and savings of $0.043 PMPM and $0.514 PMPY in a 1-million-member health plan. The PSA support base case findings; OWSA and scenario analyses reveal how parameter variability impacts results.

CONCLUSION

Savings between $174 million and $184 million can be achieved from treating 60% of R/M NPC patients in year 1 and 80% in years 2 and 3 with the toripalimab regimen over a similar pembrolizumab regimen.

摘要

目的

使用已公布的批发采购成本(WAC)和平均销售价格(ASP),估算在未经治疗的复发/转移性鼻咽癌(R/M NPC)患者中,将替雷利珠单抗方案添加到现有帕博利珠单抗方案(包括吉西他滨和顺铂)中作为治疗选择的预算影响。该方案包括替雷利珠单抗和帕博利珠单抗。

方法

在符合条件的美国年度 R/M NPC 发病人口中,比较“无”与“有”替雷利珠单抗方案的治疗组合,采用 3 年时间范围、替雷利珠单抗/帕博利珠单抗市场份额 60/40(Y1)和 80/20(Y2/3)以及因停药或进展而进行的药物调整。成本投入包括药物、管理和不良反应(AE)管理。该模型在一个假设的拥有 100 万成员的健康计划中进行了复制,其中估计了每成员每月(PMPM)和每成员每年(PMPY)的成本。进行了单因素(OWSA)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)以及情景分析。

结果

在“无”方案中,基于 WAC 的 3 年帕博利珠单抗方案总成本为 144969.533 万美元(治疗费用为 130563.2448 万美元,AE 管理费用为 14406.2885 万美元)。在“有”方案中,替雷利珠单抗方案的 3 年总成本下降至 38001.2135 万美元,替雷利珠单抗增加了 88550.59 万美元(治疗费用为 77920.6567 万美元,AE 管理费用为 10629.9333 万美元)。2024 年至 2026 年,每年的净节省额范围为 4652.6152 万美元至 7119.4214 万美元,3 年节省额为 18417.7298 万美元。在一个拥有 100 万成员的健康计划中,相关的净节省额为 3 年节省 543068 美元,节省额为 0.045 PMPM 和 0.543 PMPY。基于 ASP 的模型显示出类似的模式,在美国 R/M NPC 发病人口中,3 年的净节省额为 17423.5983 万美元,在一个拥有 100 万成员的健康计划中,节省额为 0.043 PMPM 和 0.514 PMPY。PSA 支持基础案例结果;OWSA 和情景分析揭示了参数变化如何影响结果。

结论

在 R/M NPC 患者中,替雷利珠单抗方案第一年治疗 60%的患者,第二年和第三年治疗 80%的患者,与类似的帕博利珠单抗方案相比,可以节省 1.74235983 亿美元至 1.84235983 亿美元。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验