Department of Research, Matrix45, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Medical Affairs, Coherus BioSciences, Inc, Redwood City, CA, USA.
J Med Econ. 2024;27(sup3):24-33. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2380872. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
To estimate in a panel of patients with locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with a programmed death receptor-1 inhibitor in the US in 2024 (1) the cost-efficiency of toripalimab regimens compared to pembrolizumab regimens; and (2) the budget-neutral expanded access to additional toripalimab cycles and regimens from accrued savings.
Simulation modeling of toripalimab + pemetrexed + carboplatin in nonsquamous NSCLC to a similar pembrolizumab regimen in a panel of 49,647 patients; utilizing two cost inputs (wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) at market entry and an estimated toripalimab price point of 80% of pembrolizumab average sales price (ASP)) plus administration costs over one and two years of treatment with treatment rates from 1%-10%. Scenario analyses with treatment durations equivalent to toripalimab and pembrolizumab trials' median PFS were also conducted.
In the WAC-based models, toripalimab saves $2,223 per patient per cycle and $40,014 over 1 year of treatment ($77,805 over 2 years). Extrapolated to the 49,647-patient panel, estimated 1-year savings range from $19,865,840 (1% treatment rate) to $198,658,399 (10% rate). Reallocating these savings permits budget-neutral expanded access to an additional 1,753 (1% rate) to 17,533 (10% rate) toripalimab maintenance cycles or to an additional 97 (1% rate) to 972 (10%) full 1-year toripalimab regimens with all agents. Two-year savings range from $38,628,022 (1% rate) to $386,280,221 (10%). Reallocating these efficiencies provides expanded access ranging from 3,409 (1% rate) to 34,093 (10%) additional toripalimab cycles or to 97 to 973 full 2-year regimens. The ASP model showed similar results as did the scenario analyses but at a lower magnitude than the base case.
Toripalimab generates significant savings that enable budget-neutral funding for up to 17,533 [34,093] additional maintenance cycles over one year [two years] with toripalimab + pemetrexed in nonsquamous NSCLC, or 972 [973] full one-year [two-year] regimens.
在 2024 年美国一组接受程序性死亡受体-1 抑制剂治疗的局部晚期/转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,估计与 pembrolizumab 方案相比,toripalimab 方案的成本效益:(1)在非鳞状 NSCLC 中使用 toripalimab+培美曲塞+卡铂与类似的 pembrolizumab 方案相比,toripalimab 方案的成本效益;(2)从累积节省中额外获得 toripalimab 周期和方案的预算中性扩展。
在 49647 名患者的一组患者中,对 toripalimab+培美曲塞+卡铂进行非鳞状 NSCLC 的模拟模型,与类似的 pembrolizumab 方案进行比较;利用两种成本输入(市场进入时的批发采购成本(WAC)和估计的 toripalimab 价格点为 pembrolizumab 平均销售价格(ASP)的 80%),外加第一年和第二年的治疗管理成本,治疗率为 1%-10%。还对与 toripalimab 和 pembrolizumab 试验的中位 PFS 等效的治疗持续时间进行了情景分析。
在基于 WAC 的模型中,toripalimab 每个患者每个周期节省 2223 美元,1 年治疗节省 40014 美元(2 年节省 77805 美元)。扩展到 49647 名患者组,估计 1 年节省范围从 19865840 美元(1%的治疗率)到 198658399 美元(10%的治疗率)。重新分配这些节省可以使预算中性扩展获得另外 1753 个(1%的治疗率)至 17533 个(10%的治疗率)toripalimab 维持周期,或另外获得 97 个(1%的治疗率)至 972 个(10%的治疗率)完整的 1 年 toripalimab 方案。两年节省范围从 38628022 美元(1%的治疗率)到 386280221 美元(10%的治疗率)。重新分配这些效率可以提供多达 34093 个(1%的治疗率)至 34093 个(10%的治疗率)额外的 toripalimab 周期,或 97 个(1%的治疗率)至 973 个(10%的治疗率)完整的两年治疗方案。ASP 模型显示出类似的结果,但幅度低于基础案例。
toripalimab 产生了显著的节省,这使得在非鳞状 NSCLC 中使用 toripalimab+培美曲塞可以预算中性地为多达 17533[34093]个额外的维持周期提供资金,为期一年[两年],或者为 972[973]个完整的一年[两年]方案。