Qu Xingda, Yang Baozhan, Wang Weiliang, Hu Xinyao
Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Ergonomics. 2025 May;68(5):716-722. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2375749. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Occupational falls are often initiated by trips. Mechanical perturbations applied onto the tripped foot are different for different types of tripping obstacles. The present study aimed to determine how different types of tripping obstacles affect balance recovery after trips. Sixty-four healthy adults participated in an experimental study. They were instructed to perform several walking trials, during which two trips were randomly induced, one by a pole-like obstacle and the other by a board-like obstacle. Balance recovery after trips was measured and compared between the two obstacles. Results showed that the board-like obstacle led to longer step-off time, shorter recovery step duration, and smaller minimum hip height, suggesting that the risk of trip-initiated falls could be higher with the board-like obstacle the pole-like obstacle. This finding presents the need for future research to consider the influence of obstacle type when exploring mechanisms for trips and falls.
职业性跌倒通常由绊倒引发。施加在被绊倒脚上的机械扰动因绊倒障碍物的类型不同而有所差异。本研究旨在确定不同类型的绊倒障碍物如何影响绊倒后平衡的恢复。64名健康成年人参与了一项实验研究。他们被要求进行多次步行试验,在此期间随机诱发两次绊倒,一次由杆状障碍物引起,另一次由板状障碍物引起。测量并比较了两种障碍物绊倒后平衡的恢复情况。结果表明,板状障碍物导致离地时间更长、恢复步持续时间更短以及最小髋部高度更小,这表明与杆状障碍物相比,板状障碍物引发跌倒的风险可能更高。这一发现表明未来研究在探索绊倒和跌倒机制时需要考虑障碍物类型的影响。