Hochberg Chad H, Case Aaron S, Psoter Kevin J, Brodie Daniel, Dezube Rebecca H, Sahetya Sarina K, Outten Carrie, Street Lara, Eakin Michelle N, Hager David N
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jul 17;6(7):e1127. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some centers converted intermediate care units (IMCUs) to COVID-19 ICUs (IMCU/ICUs). In this study, we compared adherence to lung protective ventilation (LPV) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated in an IMCU/ICU versus preexisting medical ICUs (MICUs).
Retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data.
Two academic medical centers from March 2020 to September 2020 (period 1) and October 2020 to May 2021 (period 2), which capture the first two COVID-19 surges in this health system.
Adults with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who met ARDS oxygenation criteria (Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315).
None.
We defined LPV adherence as the percent of the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation that met a restrictive definition of LPV of, tidal volume/predicted body weight (Vt/PBW) less than or equal to 6.5 mL/kg and plateau pressure (Pplat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2o. In an expanded definition, we added that if Pplat is greater than 30 cm H2o, Vt/PBW had to be less than 6.0 mL/kg. Using the restricted definition, period 1 adherence was lower among 133 IMCU/ICU versus 199 MICU patients (92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100], p = 0.05). Period 2 adherence was similar between groups (100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100], p = 0.68). A similar pattern was observed using the expanded definition. For the full study period, the adjusted hazard of death at 90 days was lower in IMCU/ICU versus MICU patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]), whereas ventilator liberation by day 28 was similar between groups (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]).
In patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated in an IMCU/ICU, LPV adherence was similar to, and observed survival better than those treated in preexisting MICUs. With adequate resources, protocols, and staffing, IMCUs provide an effective source of additional ICU capacity for patients with acute respiratory failure.
在新冠疫情期间,一些中心将中级护理单元(IMCU)转换为新冠重症监护病房(IMCU/ICU)。在本研究中,我们比较了在IMCU/ICU与原有内科重症监护病房(MICU)接受治疗的新冠相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的肺保护性通气(LPV)依从性及预后情况。
利用电子病历数据进行的回顾性观察研究。
两家学术医疗中心,时间分别为2020年3月至2020年9月(第1阶段)和2020年10月至2021年5月(第2阶段),涵盖了该医疗系统中前两次新冠疫情高峰。
符合ARDS氧合标准(动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值≤300 mmHg或脉搏血氧饱和度/吸入氧分数值≤315)且接受有创机械通气的成年新冠患者。
无。
我们将LPV依从性定义为机械通气前48小时内符合LPV严格定义的时间百分比,即潮气量/预测体重(Vt/PBW)≤6.5 mL/kg且平台压(Pplat)≤30 cmH₂O。在扩展定义中,我们补充规定,如果Pplat>30 cmH₂O,Vt/PBW必须<6.0 mL/kg。采用严格定义时,133例IMCU/ICU患者的第1阶段依从性低于199例MICU患者(92%[95%CI,50 - 100] vs. 100%[86 - 100],p = 0.05)。第2阶段两组间依从性相似(100%[75 - 100] vs. 95%CI[65 - 100],p = 0.68)。采用扩展定义时观察到类似模式。在整个研究期间,IMCU/ICU患者90天时调整后的死亡风险低于MICU患者(风险比[HR]0.73[9(5%CI,0.55 - 0.99]),而两组间第28天时脱机情况相似(调整后的亚分布HR 1.09[95%CI,0.85 - 1.39])。
在IMCU/ICU接受治疗的新冠ARDS患者中,LPV依从性与在原有MICU接受治疗的患者相似,且观察到的生存率更高。具备充足的资源、方案和人员配备时,IMCU可为急性呼吸衰竭患者提供有效的额外重症监护病房容量来源。