• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶汽车的安全评估:高速公路汇流场景的参考驾驶员模型。

Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.

机构信息

School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.

Vehicle Safety Institute, Graz University of Technology, Graz, 8010, Austria.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107710. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710
PMID:39018627
Abstract

Driver models are crucial for the safety assessment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of their role as reference models. Specifically, an AV is expected to achieve at least the same level of safety performance as a careful and competent driver model. To make this comparison possible, quantitative modeling of careful and competent driver models is essential. Thus, the UNECE Regulation No. 157 proposes two driver models as benchmarks for AVs, enabling safety assessment of AV longitudinal behaviors. However, these two driver models are unable to be applied in non-car-following scenarios, limiting their applications in scenarios such as highway merging. To this end, we propose a careful and competent driver model for highway merging (CCDM2) scenarios using interpretable reinforcement learning-based decision-making and safety constraint control. We compare our model's safe driving capabilities with human drivers in challenging merging scenarios and demonstrate the "careful" and "competent" characteristics of our model while ensuring its interpretability. The results indicate the model's capability to handle merging scenarios with even better safety performance than human drivers. This model is of great value for AV safety assessment in merging scenarios and contributes to future reference driver models to be included in AV safety regulations.

摘要

驾驶员模型对于自动驾驶汽车(AV)的安全评估至关重要,因为它们是参考模型。具体来说,期望自动驾驶汽车至少达到与谨慎且有能力的驾驶员模型相同的安全性能水平。为了实现这种比较,对谨慎且有能力的驾驶员模型进行定量建模是必不可少的。因此,UNECE 法规 No.157 提出了两个驾驶员模型作为自动驾驶汽车的基准,从而能够对自动驾驶汽车的纵向行为进行安全评估。然而,这两个驾驶员模型无法应用于非跟车场景,限制了它们在高速公路汇流等场景中的应用。为此,我们使用基于可解释性的强化学习决策和安全约束控制,为高速公路汇流场景提出了一个谨慎且有能力的驾驶员模型(CCDM2)。我们将我们的模型在具有挑战性的汇流场景中的安全驾驶能力与人类驾驶员进行了比较,并展示了我们模型的“谨慎”和“有能力”的特点,同时确保了其可解释性。结果表明,该模型能够处理汇流场景,其安全性能甚至优于人类驾驶员。该模型对于自动驾驶汽车在汇流场景中的安全评估具有重要价值,并为未来包括在自动驾驶汽车安全法规中的参考驾驶员模型做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.自动驾驶汽车的安全评估:高速公路汇流场景的参考驾驶员模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107710. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
How would autonomous vehicles behave in real-world crash scenarios?自动驾驶汽车在现实碰撞场景中会如何表现?
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jul;202:107572. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107572. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.自动驾驶环境下高速公路合流区的安全性能评价——基于协同仿真平台。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 May;199:107530. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107530. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
4
Law compliance decision making for autonomous vehicles on highways.高速公路自动驾驶汽车的法律合规决策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;204:107620. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107620. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.高级别自动驾驶汽车的安全性:调查配备自动驾驶系统的车辆碰撞中的边缘情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107607. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107607. Epub 2024 May 8.
6
Safety analysis of freeway on-ramp merging with the presence of autonomous vehicles.高速公路匝道汇入自动驾驶车辆时的安全性分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105966. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105966. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
7
Velocity control in car-following behavior with autonomous vehicles using reinforcement learning.自动驾驶车辆的跟车行为中利用强化学习进行速度控制。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106729. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106729. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.比一般人类驾驶员更安全(而人类驾驶员不如我安全)?考察自动驾驶汽车的一项流行安全基准。
J Safety Res. 2019 Jun;69:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Operational design domain of automated vehicles at freeway entrance terminals.高速公路入口匝道端的自动驾驶车辆运行设计域。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106776. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106776. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10
How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? Risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control.驾驶员在跟车行驶时如何应对驾驶风险?风险响应驾驶员模型及其在类人纵向控制中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105783. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105783. Epub 2020 Oct 3.