Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Center for Studies of Addiction, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2024 Jul 3;50(4):536-546. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2368180. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Substance use disorders (SUDs) are heterogeneous across multiple functional domains. Various frameworks posit that domains (e.g., executive function) contribute to the persistence of SUDs; however, the domains identified in different studies vary. We used factor analysis to identify the underlying latent domains present in a large sample ( = 5,244, 55.8% male) with a variety of SUDs to yield findings more generalizable than studies with a narrower focus. Participants (1,384 controls and 3,860 participants with one or more SUDs including alcohol, cocaine, cannabis, and/or opioid use disorders) completed the Semi-Structured Assessment for Drug Dependence and Alcoholism, the NEO Personality Inventory, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and fit indices (root mean-squared error of approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)) were used to examine different latent variable models. A multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) approach-tested associations of the latent variables with sociodemographics, substance use, and a history of abuse/neglect. A six-factor model (predominant alcohol, predominant cocaine, predominant opioid, externalizing, personality, and executive function) provided the best fit [RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI 0.060, 0.066), CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.96]. All factors were moderately correlated (coefficient = 0.25-0.55, < .05) with the exception of executive function. MIMIC analysis revealed different patterns of associations (all < .0001) with sociodemographics, substance use, and a history of abuse/neglect among the factors. The domains identified, particularly executive function, were parallel to those observed previously. These factors underscore the heterogeneous nature of SUDs and may be useful in developing more targeted clinical interventions.
物质使用障碍(SUDs)在多个功能领域存在异质性。各种框架假设,不同的领域(例如,执行功能)有助于 SUDs 的持续存在;然而,不同研究中确定的领域不同。我们使用因子分析来识别大量样本(= 5244 人,55.8%为男性)中存在的潜在潜在领域,与具有更窄重点的研究相比,这些发现更具普遍性。参与者(1384 名对照者和 3860 名患有一种或多种 SUD 的参与者,包括酒精、可卡因、大麻和/或阿片类物质使用障碍)完成了半结构化药物依赖和酒精依赖评估、大五人格量表和威斯康星卡片分类测验。探索性因子分析(EFA)和拟合指数(近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI))用于检查不同的潜在变量模型。多指标、多原因(MIMIC)方法测试了潜在变量与社会人口统计学、物质使用和滥用/忽视史的关联。六因素模型(主要是酒精、主要是可卡因、主要是阿片类药物、外化、人格和执行功能)提供了最佳拟合[RMSEA=0.063(90%置信区间 0.060,0.066),CFI=0.98,TLI=0.96]。除了执行功能,所有因素都与其他因素中度相关(系数=0.25-0.55, < .05)。MIMIC 分析揭示了不同的关联模式(所有 < .0001),与社会人口统计学、物质使用和滥用/忽视史有关。确定的因素,特别是执行功能,与以前观察到的因素相似。这些因素强调了 SUDs 的异质性性质,可能有助于开发更有针对性的临床干预措施。