Suppr超能文献

真实世界环境下全新辅助治疗对临床 III 期胃癌患者病理缓解和手术安全性的评估。

Evaluation of pathologic response and surgical safety of total neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer in a real-world setting.

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct;28(10):1597-1604. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the potential benefit of extending therapy before surgery remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without immune checkpoint blockade.

METHODS

A cohort of 174 patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from October 2021 to March 2024 in the real-world setting were included in this study. Among these patients, 101 were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and 73 were treated with perioperative neoadjuvant therapy (PNT). We compared the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, ypN0 rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with pCR or ypN0.

RESULTS

Compared with the PNT group, the patients in the TNT group were more frequently treated with intensive chemotherapy with triplets + immunotherapy. Apart from this, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.8% vs 12.3%), ypN0 (49.5% vs 38.4%), RFS, OS, and postoperative complications (27.7% vs 26.0%) between the TNT and PNT groups. Older age, diffuse type, and stable disease/progressive disease based on clinical efficacy evaluation were independently associated with non-pCR. Stable disease/progressive disease, linitis plastica, and poor differentiation were independently associated with ypN+. Neither the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles nor the specific regimens were associated with pCR or ypN0. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving total gastrectomy, there were still no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.7% vs 2.6%), ypN0 (43.8% vs 39.5%), and postoperative complications (45.8% vs 36.8%) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Although TNT did not increase the postoperative complication rate, it also did not provide any additional short-term benefits compared with PNT for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

摘要

背景

围手术期化疗是局部晚期胃癌的标准治疗方法。然而,手术前延长治疗的潜在益处在很大程度上仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估总新辅助化疗联合或不联合免疫检查点阻断的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了 2021 年 10 月至 2024 年 3 月在真实世界环境中接受 D2 胃切除术的 174 例临床 III 期胃癌患者。其中 101 例接受总新辅助治疗(TNT),73 例接受围手术期新辅助治疗(PNT)。我们比较了两组的病理完全缓解(pCR)率、ypN0 率、无复发生存率(RFS)、总生存率(OS)和术后并发症。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定与 pCR 或 ypN0 相关的因素。

结果

与 PNT 组相比,TNT 组患者更常接受三联化疗加免疫治疗。除此之外,两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。TNT 组和 PNT 组的 pCR(16.8%比 12.3%)、ypN0(49.5%比 38.4%)、RFS、OS 和术后并发症(27.7%比 26.0%)无统计学差异。年龄较大、弥漫型和基于临床疗效评估的稳定/进展疾病与非 pCR 独立相关。稳定/进展疾病、皮革胃和低分化与 ypN+独立相关。新辅助治疗周期的数量和具体方案均与 pCR 或 ypN0 无关。在接受全胃切除术的患者亚组分析中,两组的 pCR(16.7%比 2.6%)、ypN0(43.8%比 39.5%)和术后并发症(45.8%比 36.8%)仍无统计学差异。

结论

尽管 TNT 并未增加术后并发症发生率,但与 PNT 相比,对临床 III 期胃癌也未提供任何额外的短期益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验