National Heart Foundation Hospital and Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Heart. 2024 Aug 14;110(17):1090-1098. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324253.
The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the HEARTS technical package for improving hypertension control worldwide, but its effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated.
To compare hypertension outcomes in clinics implementing HEARTS versus clinics continuing usual hypertension care in rural Bangladesh.
A matched-pair cluster quasi-experimental trial in Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs; primary healthcare facilities) was conducted in rural Bangladesh. A total of 3935 patients (mean age 52.3 years, 70.5% female) with uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg regardless of treatment history) were enrolled: 1950 patients from 7 HEARTS UHCs and 1985 patients from 7 matched usual care UHCs. The primary outcome was systolic BP at 6 months measured at the patient's home; secondary outcomes were diastolic BP, hypertension control rate (<140/90 mm Hg) and loss to follow-up. Multivariable mixed-effects linear and Poisson models were conducted.
Baseline mean systolic BP was 158.4 mm Hg in the intervention group and 158.8 mm Hg in the usual care group. At 6 months, 95.5% of participants completed follow-up. Compared with usual care, the intervention significantly lowered systolic BP (-23.7 mm Hg vs -20.0 mm Hg; net difference -3.7 mm Hg (95% CI -5.1 to -2.2)) and diastolic BP (-10.2 mm Hg vs -8.3 mm Hg; net difference -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI -2.7 to -1.1)) and improved hypertension control (62.0% vs 49.7%, net difference 12.3% (95% CI 9.0 to 16.8)). Rate of missed clinic visits was lower in the intervention group (8.8% vs 39.3%, p<0.001).
After WHO-HEARTS package implementation in rural Bangladesh, BP was lowered and hypertension control improved significantly compared with usual care.
NCT04992039.
世界卫生组织(WHO)提倡使用 HEARTS 技术包来改善全球高血压控制,但尚未对其有效性进行严格评估。
比较在孟加拉国农村实施 HEARTS 与继续常规高血压护理的诊所之间的高血压结局。
在孟加拉国农村的 Upazila Health Complexes(UHC;初级保健设施)中进行了配对的对子准实验性试验。共有 3935 名未控制的高血压患者(平均年龄 52.3 岁,70.5%为女性)入组:7 个 HEARTS UHC 中有 1950 名患者,7 个匹配的常规护理 UHC 中有 1985 名患者。主要结局是患者家中测量的 6 个月时的收缩压;次要结局是舒张压、高血压控制率(<140/90mmHg)和失访率。采用多变量混合效应线性和泊松模型进行分析。
干预组和常规护理组的基线平均收缩压分别为 158.4mmHg 和 158.8mmHg。在 6 个月时,95.5%的参与者完成了随访。与常规护理相比,干预显著降低了收缩压(-23.7mmHg 与-20.0mmHg;净差值-3.7mmHg(95%CI-5.1 至-2.2))和舒张压(-10.2mmHg 与-8.3mmHg;净差值-1.9mmHg(95%CI-2.7 至-1.1)),并改善了高血压控制率(62.0%与 49.7%,净差值 12.3%(95%CI9.0 至 16.8))。干预组错过就诊的比例较低(8.8%与 39.3%,p<0.001)。
在孟加拉国农村实施 WHO-HEARTS 方案后,与常规护理相比,血压明显降低,高血压控制显著改善。
NCT04992039。