社区卫生工作者主导的多组分干预对阿根廷低收入患者血压控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
作者信息
He Jiang, Irazola Vilma, Mills Katherine T, Poggio Rosana, Beratarrechea Andrea, Dolan Jacquelyn, Chen Chung-Shiuan, Gibbons Luz, Krousel-Wood Marie, Bazzano Lydia A, Nejamis Analia, Gulayin Pablo, Santero Marilina, Augustovski Federico, Chen Jing, Rubinstein Adolfo
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Tulane University Translational Science Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana.
出版信息
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1016-1025. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11358.
IMPORTANCE
Despite extensive knowledge of hypertension treatment, the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension is high and increasing in low- and middle-income countries.
OBJECTIVE
To test whether a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention would improve blood pressure (BP) control among low-income patients with hypertension.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster randomized trial was conducted in 18 centers for primary health care within a national public system providing free medications and health care to uninsured patients in Argentina. A total of 1432 low-income adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited between June 2013 and April 2015 and followed up to October 2016.
INTERVENTIONS
Nine centers (743 patients) were randomized to the multicomponent intervention, which included a community health worker-led home intervention (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback), a physician intervention, and a text-messaging intervention over 18 months. Nine centers (689 patients) were randomized to usual care.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The coprimary outcomes were the differences in systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to the end of follow-up of patients with hypertension. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension (BP <140/90 mm Hg). Three BP measurements were obtained at each of 2 baseline and 2 termination visits using a standard protocol, the means of which were used for analyses.
RESULTS
Of 1432 participants (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 13.3]; 772 women [53.0%]), 1357 (94.8%) completed the trial. Baseline mean systolic BP was 151.7 mm Hg for the intervention group and 149.8 mm Hg for the usual care group; the mean diastolic BP was 92.2 mm Hg for the intervention group and 90.1 mm Hg for the usual care group. Systolic BP reduction from baseline to month 18 was 19.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 17.9-20.8 mm Hg) for the intervention group and 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.3-14.2 mm Hg) for the usual care group; the difference in the reduction was 6.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.6-8.6; P < .001). Diastolic BP decreased by 12.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.2-13.2 mm Hg) in the intervention group and 6.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 5.9-7.8 mm Hg) in the control group; the difference in the reduction was 5.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.0-6.8 mm Hg; P < .001). The proportion of patients with controlled hypertension increased from 17.0% at baseline to 72.9% at 18 months in the intervention group and from 17.6% to 52.2% in the usual care group; the difference in the increase was 20.6% (95% CI, 15.4%-25.9%; P < .001). No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Low-income patients in Argentina with uncontrolled hypertension who participated in a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention experienced a greater decrease in systolic and diastolic BP than did patients who received usual care over 18 months. Further research is needed to assess generalizability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention and to understand which components may have contributed most to the outcome.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01834131.
重要性
尽管对高血压治疗有广泛了解,但在低收入和中等收入国家,未控制的高血压患病率仍然很高且呈上升趋势。
目的
测试由社区卫生工作者主导的多组分干预措施是否能改善低收入高血压患者的血压控制情况。
设计、地点和参与者:在阿根廷一个为未参保患者提供免费药物和医疗服务的国家公共系统内的18个初级卫生保健中心进行了一项整群随机试验。2013年6月至2015年4月期间共招募了1432名未控制高血压的低收入成年患者,并随访至2016年10月。
干预措施
9个中心(743名患者)被随机分配到多组分干预组,该干预包括由社区卫生工作者主导的家庭干预(健康指导、家庭血压监测以及血压审核与反馈)、医生干预以及为期18个月的短信干预。9个中心(689名患者)被随机分配到常规护理组。
主要结局和测量指标
共同主要结局是高血压患者从基线到随访结束时收缩压和舒张压变化的差异。次要结局包括血压得到控制(血压<140/90 mmHg)的患者比例。使用标准方案在2次基线访视和2次终止访视时分别进行3次血压测量,取其平均值用于分析。
结果
在1432名参与者中(平均年龄55.8岁[标准差13.3];772名女性[53.0%]),1357名(94.8%)完成了试验。干预组基线平均收缩压为151.7 mmHg,常规护理组为149.8 mmHg;干预组平均舒张压为92.2 mmHg,常规护理组为90.1 mmHg。干预组从基线到第18个月收缩压降低了19.3 mmHg(95%置信区间,17.9 - 20.8 mmHg),常规护理组降低了12.7 mmHg(95%置信区间,11.3 - 14.2 mmHg);降低幅度的差异为6.6 mmHg(95%置信区间,4.6 - 8.6;P <.001)。干预组舒张压降低了12.2 mmHg(95%置信区间,11.2 - 13.2 mmHg),对照组降低了6.9 mmHg(95%置信区间,5.9 - 7.8 mmHg);降低幅度的差异为5.4 mmHg(95%置信区间,4.0 - 6.8 mmHg;P <.001)。干预组血压得到控制的患者比例从基线时的17.0%增至18个月时的72.9%,常规护理组从17.6%增至52.2%;增加幅度的差异为20.6%(95%置信区间,15.4% - 25.9%;P <.001)。未报告不良事件。
结论和相关性
在阿根廷,参与由社区卫生工作者主导的多组分干预的未控制高血压低收入患者,在18个月内收缩压和舒张压的降低幅度大于接受常规护理的患者。需要进一步研究以评估该干预措施的可推广性和成本效益,并了解哪些组分可能对结果贡献最大。
试验注册
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01834131
相似文献
引用本文的文献
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-5-27
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2024-12-11
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025-5-12