Suppr超能文献

2002-2023 年 EMTALA 违规涉及未成年人的民事货币罚款

Civil Monetary Penalties for EMTALA Violations Involving Minors, 2002-2023.

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):674-681. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-007732.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) is intended to prevent inadequate, delayed, or denied treatment of emergent conditions by emergency departments (EDs). EMTALA requirements pertain to patients of all ages presenting to dedicated EDs regardless of whether facilities have dedicated pediatric specialty services. This study aims to describe EMTALA-related civil monetary penalty (CMP) settlements involving minors.

METHODS

Descriptions of all EMTALA-related CMPs occurring between 2002 and 2023 were obtained from the Office of the Inspector General web site and reviewed for involvement of minors (<18 years of age) using keywords in settlement summaries. Characteristics of settlements involving minors were described and compared with settlements not involving minors.

RESULTS

Of 260 EMTALA-related CMPs, 38 (14.6%) involved minors. Most involved failure to provide a medical screening exam (MSE) (86.8%) and/or stabilizing treatment (52.6%). Seven (18.4%) involved pregnant minors. Eleven (28.9%) involved ED staff directing a patient (or guardian) to another facility, typically by private vehicle, and another involved 2 patients referred to on-campus outpatient clinics without an MSE.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 7 CMPs related to EMTALA violations involved minors, and 1 in 5 of these minors was pregnant. One-third of CMPs involving minors included ED staff directing patients to proceed to another facility or on-campus clinic without MSE or stabilization. Findings suggest a need for providers to understand EMTALA-specific requirements for appropriate MSE, stabilization, and transfer, and for EDs at hospitals with limited pediatric services to implement policies for the evaluation of minors and protocols for transfer when indicated.

摘要

背景与目的

《紧急医疗与劳动法》(EMTALA)旨在防止急诊部门(ED)对紧急情况进行不充分、延迟或拒绝治疗。EMTALA 的要求适用于所有年龄段的患者,无论其设施是否设有专门的儿科专科服务,都需要到专门的 ED 就诊。本研究旨在描述涉及未成年人的 EMTALA 相关民事罚款(CMP)和解。

方法

从监察长办公室网站获取 2002 年至 2023 年间发生的所有 EMTALA 相关 CMP 的描述,并使用和解摘要中的关键词审查是否涉及未成年人(<18 岁)。描述涉及未成年人的和解的特征,并与不涉及未成年人的和解进行比较。

结果

在 260 项 EMTALA 相关 CMP 中,有 38 项(14.6%)涉及未成年人。大多数涉及未能提供医疗筛查检查(MSE)(86.8%)和/或稳定治疗(52.6%)。有 7 项(18.4%)涉及未成年孕妇。有 11 项(28.9%)涉及 ED 工作人员指示患者(或监护人)到另一家医疗机构,通常是通过私人车辆,另一起涉及 2 名患者未经 MSE 转至校内门诊诊所。

结论

在与 EMTALA 违规相关的 CMP 中,有 1/7 涉及未成年人,其中 1/5 的未成年人是孕妇。涉及未成年人的 CMP 中有三分之一包括 ED 工作人员指示患者在未经 MSE 或稳定治疗的情况下前往另一家医疗机构或校内诊所。这些发现表明,医疗机构需要了解 EMTALA 对适当 MSE、稳定和转移的具体要求,对于儿科服务有限的医院的 ED,需要制定针对未成年人的评估政策和转院协议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验