Graduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Sep;24(9):827-840. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14931. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
The effectiveness of interdisciplinary home healthcare service consisting of at least two or more healthcare providers, such as a nurse, physician and physiotherapist, for community-dwelling older adults remains unclear. This systematic review assesses the effects of interdisciplinary home care on quality of life (QOL) and health outcomes in older adults with chronic conditions using validated tools. Databases were searched using CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and OpenGrey from inception to January 25, 2021. Eligibility criteria included (i) an interdisciplinary home care approach, (ii) participants aged 65 years and older with chronic conditions, (iii) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and (iv) original literature in English. The study reviewer's dyad independently screened the literature and assessed the study quality using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The analysis employed qualitative and quantitative integration and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study included 13 RCTs with 4709 participants. Four RCTs indicated that interdisciplinary home healthcare services reduced hospital admissions during the initial 6 months after the start of home care interventions (risk ratio [RR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61-0.88; p < 0.001; I = 0%). However, evidence certainty was moderate; QOL and mortality showed low certainty; and institutionalization and adherence showed moderate certainty of evidence. This study suggests that the interdisciplinary home care approach reduces hospital admissions but lacks effects on other outcomes. More robust studies are required to evaluate this evidence. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 827-840.
由至少两名或更多医疗保健提供者(如护士、医生和物理治疗师)组成的跨学科家庭保健服务对居住在社区的老年患者的生活质量(QOL)和健康结果的有效性尚不清楚。本系统评价使用经过验证的工具评估了跨学科家庭护理对患有慢性病的老年患者的生活质量和健康结果的影响。从建库到 2021 年 1 月 25 日,使用 CINAHL Plus with Full Text、PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、PsycINFO 和 OpenGrey 数据库进行了检索。纳入标准包括:(i)跨学科家庭护理方法;(ii)年龄在 65 岁及以上患有慢性病的患者;(iii)随机对照试验(RCT);(iv)原始文献为英文。研究审查员二人组独立筛选文献,并使用 Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 工具评估研究质量。分析采用定性和定量综合以及推荐评估、制定和评估分级。本研究纳入了 13 项 RCT,共 4709 名参与者。4 项 RCT 表明,跨学科家庭医疗保健服务可减少家庭护理干预开始后最初 6 个月内的住院人数(风险比 [RR] = 0.73;95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.61-0.88;p < 0.001;I = 0%)。然而,证据确定性为中等;QOL 和死亡率显示低确定性;而机构化和依从性显示证据确定性为中等。本研究表明,跨学科家庭护理方法可减少住院人数,但对其他结果没有影响。需要更有力的研究来评估这一证据。老年医学与老年病学国际 2024 年;24:827-840.