• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

菲律宾用于耐药结核病治疗的BPaL方案的成本及成本效益

Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines.

作者信息

Evans D, Hirasen K, Casalme D J, Gler M T, Gupta A, Juneja S

机构信息

Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Health Economics Division, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

IJTLD Open. 2024 Jun 1;1(6):242-249. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0094. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0094
PMID:39021448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11249654/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2022, the WHO announced that the 6-month BPaL/M regimen should be used for drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We estimate the patient and provider costs of BPaL compared to current standard-of-care treatment in the Philippines.

METHODS

Patients on BPaL under operational research, or 9-11-month standard short oral regimen (SSOR) and 18-21-month standard long oral regimen (SLOR) under programmatic conditions were interviewed using the WHO cross-sectional TB patient cost tool. Provider costs were assessed through a bottom-up and top-down costing analysis.

RESULTS

Total patient costs per treatment episode were lowest with BPaL (USD518.0) and increased with use of SSOR (USD825.8) and SLOR (USD1,023.0). Total provider costs per successful treatment were lowest with BPaL (USD1,994.5) and increased with SSOR (USD3,121.5) and SLOR (USD10,032.4). Compared to SSOR, BPaL treatment was cost-effective at even the lowest willingness to pay threshold. As expected, SLOR was the costliest and least effective regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs incurred by patients on BPaL were 37% (95% CI 22-56) less than SSOR and 50% (95% CI 32-68) less than SLOR, while providers could save 36% (95% CI 21-56) to 80% (95% CI 64-93) per successful treatment, respectively. The study shows that treatment of DR-TB with BPaL was cost-saving for patients and cost-effective for the health system.

摘要

背景

2022年,世界卫生组织宣布,6个月的BPaL/M方案应用于耐多药结核病(DR-TB)治疗。我们评估了在菲律宾,相较于当前的标准治疗方案,BPaL方案治疗耐多药结核病的患者成本和医疗服务提供者成本。

方法

采用世界卫生组织横断面结核病患者成本工具,对参与运营研究的接受BPaL方案治疗的患者,以及在项目条件下接受9 - 11个月标准短程口服方案(SSOR)和18 - 21个月标准长程口服方案(SLOR)治疗的患者进行访谈。通过自下而上和自上而下的成本分析评估医疗服务提供者成本。

结果

每个治疗疗程的患者总成本以BPaL方案最低(518.0美元),使用SSOR方案(825.8美元)和SLOR方案(1023.0美元)时成本增加。每例成功治疗的医疗服务提供者总成本以BPaL方案最低(1994.5美元),使用SSOR方案(3121.5美元)和SLOR方案(10032.4美元)时成本增加。与SSOR方案相比,即使在最低支付意愿阈值下,BPaL方案治疗仍具有成本效益。正如预期的那样,SLOR方案是成本最高且效果最差的治疗方案。

结论

接受BPaL方案治疗的患者成本比接受SSOR方案治疗的患者低37%(95%置信区间22 - 56),比接受SLOR方案治疗的患者低50%(95%置信区间32 - 68),而医疗服务提供者每例成功治疗可分别节省36%(95%置信区间21 - 56)至80%(95%置信区间64 - 93)。该研究表明,使用BPaL方案治疗耐多药结核病对患者而言可节省成本,对卫生系统而言具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines.菲律宾用于耐药结核病治疗的BPaL方案的成本及成本效益
IJTLD Open. 2024 Jun 1;1(6):242-249. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0094. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.
3
Budgetary impact of using BPaL for treating extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.使用 BPaL 治疗广泛耐药结核病的预算影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007182.
4
Savings from the introduction of BPaL and BPaLM regimens at the country level.在国家层面引入BPaL和BPaLM治疗方案所带来的节省。
IJTLD Open. 2024 Jul 1;1(7):314-319. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0213. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Cost-effectiveness of short, oral treatment regimens for rifampicin resistant tuberculosis.利福平耐药结核病短程口服治疗方案的成本效益
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;2(12):e0001337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001337. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-effectiveness of pretomanid-based regimen for highly drugresistant TB in a low-burden setting.基于pretomanid 的方案治疗低负担环境下高度耐药结核病的成本效益分析。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2024 Feb 1;28(2):81-85. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.23.0163.
7
A Modified BPaL Regimen for Tuberculosis Treatment replaces Linezolid with Inhaled Spectinamides.一种用于结核病治疗的改良BPaL方案用吸入性氨甲环酸酰胺替代了利奈唑胺。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 11:2023.11.16.567434. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.16.567434.
8
Acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of stakeholders implementing the novel BPaL regimen to treat extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.接受度、可行性和利益相关者实施新型 BPaL 方案治疗广泛耐药结核病患者的可能性。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11427-y.
9
Impact and cost-effectiveness of the 6-month BPaLM regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Moldova: A mathematical modeling analysis.摩尔多瓦利福平耐药结核病 6 个月 BPaLM 方案的影响和成本效益:一项数学建模分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 3;21(5):e1004401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004401. eCollection 2024 May.
10
The Safety and Tolerability of Linezolid in Novel Short-Course Regimens Containing Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid to Treat Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.贝达喹啉、普托马尼和利奈唑胺新短程方案治疗利福平耐药结核病的安全性和耐受性:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 20;78(3):730-741. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad653.

引用本文的文献

1
Pakistan's path forward in DR-TB management: insights from global implementation of BPaL/BPaLM regimen.巴基斯坦耐多药结核病管理的前进道路:BPaL/BPaLM方案全球实施的见解
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 10;87(8):4713-4717. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003548. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparing cost-effectiveness of short-course regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in India.印度耐多药结核病短程治疗方案的成本效益比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 21;41(1):e48. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100329.
3
The catastrophic cost of TB care: Understanding costs incurred by individuals undergoing TB care in low-, middle-, and high-income settings - A systematic review.结核病治疗的灾难性成本:了解低收入、中等收入和高收入环境中接受结核病治疗的个人所产生的费用——一项系统综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;5(4):e0004283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004283. eCollection 2025.
4
Urgent request for pretomanid label expansion to align with WHO guidelines and improve treatment accessibility and efficacy.紧急请求扩大 Pretomanid 的标签范围,以符合世界卫生组织的指南,并提高治疗的可及性和疗效。
IJTLD Open. 2025 Mar 12;2(3):117-119. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0152. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Impact of financial support on treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A population-based, retrospective cohort study in Shanghai, China.财政支持对耐多药结核病治疗结果的影响:一项基于人群的中国上海回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2024 Nov 29;37:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100500. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
A 24-Week, All-Oral Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis.24 周全口服方案治疗利福平耐药结核病。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2331-2343. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2117166.
2
Economic evaluation: a reader's guide to studies of cost-effectiveness.经济评估:成本效益研究读者指南
Arch Physiother. 2022 Dec 15;12(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00154-1.
3
Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.贝达喹啉-普托马尼德-利奈唑胺方案治疗耐药结核病。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 1;387(9):810-823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119430.
4
Updated WHO definitions for tuberculosis outcomes: Simplified, unified and future-proofed.世界卫生组织结核病转归的更新定义:简化、统一且面向未来。
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 15;28(2). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2022.v28i2.224. eCollection 2022.
5
Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: A systematic review.基于支付意愿和人均 GDP 估算医疗保健增量成本效益阈值范围:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266934. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.
7
Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis.耐多药肺结核的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893-902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901814.
8
Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.肺耐多药结核病成功治疗结果的相关因素:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):821-834. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31644-1.
9
Measuring income for catastrophic cost estimates: Limitations and policy implications of current approaches.衡量灾难性医疗支出的收入:现行方法的局限性及政策影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct;215:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.041. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
10
A systematic review of the cost and cost effectiveness of treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.抗多药耐药结核病治疗的成本和成本效益的系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jan;30(1):63-80. doi: 10.2165/11595340-000000000-00000.