• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者冠状动脉分叉支架置入术结局的性别差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Gender-based disparities in outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Khanal Resha, Hamza Mohammad, Najam Maria, Basit Salman Abdul, Wajid Zarghoona, Rashdi Amna, Patel Neel, Razzaq Saman, Shah Rajendra, Harmouch Khaled M, Alyami Bandar, Bahar Yasemin, Aamir Muhammad, Abu-Mahfouz Mohammed, Sattar Yasar, Alraies M Chadi

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne Health University/Detroit Medical Center Detroit, MI, USA.

Guthrie Medical Group Cortland, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jun 15;14(3):136-143. doi: 10.62347/YBJN2231. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.62347/YBJN2231
PMID:39021520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11249663/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Around 15-20% of lesions necessitating percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are attributed to coronary bifurcation lesions. We aim to study gender-based differences in PCI outcomes among bifurcation stents.

METHODS

3 studies were included after thorough systematic search using MEDLINE (EMBASE and PubMed). CRAN-R software using the Metabin module was used for statistical analysis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the random effect model and the Mantel-Haenszel method, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) used to determine statistical significance. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I.

RESULT

Women exhibited a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.76, I = 0%, P < 0.0001), post-procedural bleeding (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.47-0.6, I = 0%, P < 0.0001) and post-procedure stroke (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.0, I = 0%, P < 0.06) as compared to men. However, there were no significant differences in terms of myocardial infarction (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.22-3.27, I = 49.4%, P < 0.80) and cardiac tamponade (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.06; 5.72, I = 0%, P < 0.6821) in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals a noteworthy increase in in-hospital mortality in women, which could be attributed to a higher rate of major bleeding, advanced age, increased co-morbidities, and complex pathophysiology of the lesion in comparison to men. Further studies are required to gain a better understanding of the precise mechanisms thus enhancing procedural outcomes.

摘要

引言

约15%-20%需要进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的病变归因于冠状动脉分叉病变。我们旨在研究分叉支架PCI结果中的性别差异。

方法

通过使用MEDLINE(EMBASE和PubMed)进行全面系统检索后纳入3项研究。使用CRAN-R软件的Metabin模块进行统计分析。采用随机效应模型和Mantel-Haenszel方法计算合并比值比(OR),并使用95%置信区间(CI)确定统计学显著性。使用Higgins I评估异质性。

结果

与男性相比,女性住院死亡率(OR 0.67,95% CI 0.58-0.76,I = 0%,P < 0.0001)、术后出血(OR 0.53,95% CI 0.47-0.6,I = 0%,P < 0.0001)和术后中风(OR 0.72,95% CI 0.52-1.0,I = 0%,P < 0.06)的风险更高。然而,两组在心肌梗死(OR 0.84,95% CI 0.22-3.27,I = 49.4%,P < 0.80)和心脏压塞(OR 0.63,95% CI 0.06;5.72,I = 0%,P < 0.6821)方面无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究显示女性住院死亡率显著增加,这可能归因于与男性相比更高的大出血发生率、高龄、合并症增加以及病变复杂的病理生理学。需要进一步研究以更好地理解确切机制,从而改善手术结果。

相似文献

1
Gender-based disparities in outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者冠状动脉分叉支架置入术结局的性别差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jun 15;14(3):136-143. doi: 10.62347/YBJN2231. eCollection 2024.
2
Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分叉病变中挤压与临时支架技术相关的心血管结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1070-y.
3
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention involving coronary bifurcation is associated with higher mortality and complications.涉及冠状动脉分叉的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与更高的死亡率和并发症相关。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jun 15;14(3):180-187. doi: 10.62347/XDDB4510. eCollection 2024.
5
Dedicated Bifurcation Stents for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.用于冠状动脉分叉病变的专用分叉支架:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Dec;31(12):E344-E355.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术的临床结局:包含 5711 例患者的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.054.
8
True coronary bifurcation lesions: meta-analysis and review of literature.真性冠状动脉分叉病变:荟萃分析及文献复习。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Feb;11(2):103-10. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832ffc85.
9
Predictors and outcomes of side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the COBIS II Registry (COronary BIfurcation Stenting).冠状动脉分叉病变中主血管支架置入后分支闭塞的预测因素及转归:COBIS II 注册研究(冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 29;62(18):1654-1659. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Sex difference in clinical and procedural outcomes in patients undergoing coronary atherectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉旋磨术治疗患者的临床和操作结局的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2022 Dec 1;33(8):634-642. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001187. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Is Not Predictor for Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation.性别并非冠状动脉分叉处经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床结局的预测因素。
Korean Circ J. 2025 Jan;55(1):17-19. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0333. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender-related differences in clinical outcomes after either single or double left main bifurcation stenting.左主干分叉病变行单支架或双支架治疗后临床结局的性别差异。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Aug;37(8):1326-1336. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02038-7. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Gender-based outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting: A report from the National Readmission Database.基于性别的冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术结果:来自全国再入院数据库的报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):433-439. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29704. Epub 2021 May 15.
3
Impact of sex on outcomes of bifurcation lesion percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a single-centre prospective registry.性别对分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的影响:单中心前瞻性注册研究结果。
Coron Artery Dis. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):31-36. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001039.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
A sex paradox in clinical outcomes following complex percutaneous coronary intervention.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的性别悖论。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;329:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.067. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
7
40 Years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: History and Future Directions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗40年:历史与未来方向
J Pers Med. 2018 Oct 1;8(4):33. doi: 10.3390/jpm8040033.
8
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
9
Gender-Related Differences in Iliofemoral Arterial Anatomy among Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.腹主动脉瘤患者髂股动脉解剖结构的性别差异
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings.冠状动脉分叉病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:欧洲分叉俱乐部会议头10年的共识
EuroIntervention. 2014 Sep;10(5):545-60. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A97.